Poon Darren M C, Cheung William S K, Chiu Peter K F, Chung Daniel H S, Kung John B T, Lam Daisy C M, Leung Angus K C, Ng Anthony C F, O'Sullivan Joe M, Teoh Jeremy Y C, Wu Philip Y, Wu Sam K K, Kwong Philip W K
Department of Clinical Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Translational Oncology, Sir YK Pao Centre for Cancer, Hong Kong Cancer Institute, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Comprehensive Oncology Centre, Hong Kong Sanatorium and Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Front Oncol. 2025 Feb 25;15:1530580. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1530580. eCollection 2025.
Despite the boom in the development of cancer management in the last decade, most patients with metastatic prostate cancer (PCa) eventually progress to metastatic castration-resistant PCa (mCRPC) and often require multiple lines of treatment. The treatment landscape of mCRPC has evolved rapidly in recent years, introducing various types of systemic therapies, including taxane-based chemotherapy, androgen receptor pathway inhibitors, bone-targeted radionuclides (e.g., radium-223), immune checkpoint inhibitors, poly(adenosine diphosphate [ADP]-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, and radioligand therapies (RLTs) [e.g., a prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) ligand labelled with Lu].
To help clinicians navigate the increasingly complex treatment landscape of mCRPC, this article reviews the evidence on different therapeutic regimens from pivotal trials. In addition, it reports on the results of a questionnaire developed and distributed by the Hong Kong Society of Uro-Oncology (HKSUO), with the aim of collecting the perspectives of specialists experienced in the treatment of advanced PCa in Hong Kong with regard to the clinical application of RLT, primarily [Lu]Lu-PSMA-617/analogue therapy.
A total of 43 questionnaire respondents (including clinical oncologists, urologists, nuclear medicine specialists, and medical oncologists) voted on 27 consensus questions divided into eight sections. Consensus or strong consensus (correspondingly ≥75% or ≥90% acceptance for an answer option) was reached for 10 questions. Subsequently, a panel of 13 local and overseas experts coordinated by the HKSUO discussed the voting results and provided further insights into certain questions.
The literature review, the voting results of the questionnaire, and the expert opinions are expected to facilitate better understanding of recent therapeutic advancements and the role of novel RLTs in the treatment of mCRPC among clinicians.
尽管在过去十年中癌症治疗的发展蓬勃,但大多数转移性前列腺癌(PCa)患者最终会进展为转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌(mCRPC),且常常需要多线治疗。近年来,mCRPC的治疗格局迅速演变,引入了各种类型的全身治疗方法,包括紫杉烷类化疗、雄激素受体通路抑制剂、骨靶向放射性核素(如镭-223)、免疫检查点抑制剂、聚(腺苷二磷酸[ADP]-核糖)聚合酶(PARP)抑制剂以及放射性配体疗法(RLTs)[例如,用镥标记的前列腺特异性膜抗原(PSMA)配体]。
为帮助临床医生应对日益复杂的mCRPC治疗格局,本文回顾了关键试验中不同治疗方案的证据。此外,还报告了香港泌尿肿瘤学会(HKSUO)制定并分发的一份调查问卷的结果,目的是收集香港在晚期PCa治疗方面经验丰富的专家对RLT临床应用的看法,主要是[镥]镥-PSMA-617/类似物疗法。
共有43名问卷受访者(包括临床肿瘤学家、泌尿科医生、核医学专家和医学肿瘤学家)对分为八个部分的27个共识问题进行了投票。10个问题达成了共识或强烈共识(相应地,一个答案选项的接受率≥75%或≥90%)。随后,由HKSUO协调的一个由13名本地和海外专家组成的小组讨论了投票结果,并对某些问题提供了进一步的见解。
文献综述、问卷投票结果和专家意见有望促进临床医生更好地理解近期的治疗进展以及新型RLT在mCRPC治疗中的作用。