Hawkins Summer Sherburne, Coley Rebekah Levine, Lanteri Lindsay, Baum Christopher F
School of Social Work, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA, USA.
Lynch School of Education and Human Development, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA, USA.
Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2025;51(3):360-371. doi: 10.1080/00952990.2024.2444567. Epub 2025 Mar 12.
Tobacco 21 (T21) laws (prohibiting tobacco sales under age 21) and flavor restrictions have recently been enacted, yet little is known about the extent to which these policies shifted adolescent tobacco use. To examine the associations between state-level T21 laws and flavor restrictions with adolescent tobacco use overall and by age. We linked state-level T21 laws and flavor restrictions with individual-level data on self-reported levels of cigarette, cigar, and electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) use among 979,477 (500,205 female/479,272 male) 14-18+-year-olds from the 2011-2021 Youth Risk Behavior Surveys. We estimated adjusted zero-inflated negative binomial regression models to predict the likelihood of zero use and frequency of use among users and calculated total predicted use, with year and state fixed effects. There were no associations between flavor restrictions and cigarette, cigar, or ENDS use. There also were no associations between T21 laws and cigarette use; however, when categorized based on the laws' policy components, strong T21 laws were associated with lower cigarette use (total marginal effect estimate: -0.34; -0.59, -0.09; = .009, showing a 0.34 day/month decline). T21 laws were associated with higher ENDS use (total marginal effect estimate: 0.36; 0.11, 0.60; = .004, showing a 0.36 day/month increase). Policy effects did not vary by age. Current state policies aimed at reducing access to tobacco products have not curbed adolescent tobacco use. Our findings suggest that more comprehensive state laws, including T21 laws with strong policy components, are needed to fill gaps in federal age and flavor restrictions.
“烟草21岁”(T21)法案(禁止向21岁以下人群销售烟草)和口味限制措施最近已颁布实施,但对于这些政策在多大程度上改变了青少年烟草使用情况,人们却知之甚少。为了研究州级T21法案和口味限制措施与青少年总体烟草使用情况以及按年龄划分的烟草使用情况之间的关联。我们将州级T21法案和口味限制措施与来自2011 - 2021年青少年风险行为调查的979,477名(500,205名女性/479,272名男性)14至18岁及以上青少年自我报告的香烟、雪茄和电子尼古丁传送系统(ENDS)使用水平的个体层面数据进行了关联。我们估计了调整后的零膨胀负二项回归模型,以预测不使用的可能性以及使用者的使用频率,并计算了总预测使用量,同时纳入了年份和州固定效应。口味限制措施与香烟、雪茄或ENDS使用之间没有关联。T21法案与香烟使用之间也没有关联;然而,根据法案的政策组成部分进行分类时,强有力的T21法案与较低的香烟使用量相关(总边际效应估计值:-0.34;-0.59,-0.09;P = 0.009,显示每月减少0.34天)。T21法案与较高的ENDS使用量相关(总边际效应估计值:0.36;0.11,0.60;P = 0.004,显示每月增加0.36天)。政策效果在不同年龄组中没有差异。当前旨在减少烟草产品获取途径的州级政策并未抑制青少年烟草使用。我们的研究结果表明,需要更全面的州级法律,包括具有强有力政策组成部分的T21法案,来填补联邦年龄和口味限制方面的空白。