Suppr超能文献

在“青年外科医生机器人课程”(RoCS)中使用O评分法预测机器人内脏手术的基本机器人操作能力

Prediction of Basic Robotic Competence for Robotic Visceral Operations Using the O-Score within the "Robotic Curriculum for Young Surgeons" (RoCS).

作者信息

Stockheim Jessica, Andric Mihailo, Dölling Maximilian, Perrakis Aristotelis, Croner Roland S

机构信息

Department of General, Visceral, Vascular, and Transplant Surgery, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.

Department of General, Visceral, Vascular, and Transplant Surgery, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.

出版信息

J Surg Educ. 2025 May;82(5):103500. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2025.103500. Epub 2025 Mar 11.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Surgical residency programs lack structured assessments of robotic surgery. The validated O-Score is an assessment tool for tracking robotic operative proficiency consisting of 9 items on a 5 point Likert scale. Surgical autonomy is one comprehensive binary item. This study aimed to establish a benchmark for the number of procedures and the O-Score sum score to achieve surgical autonomy in robotic visceral procedures.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This single-center prospective pilot cohort study assessed robotic procedures between 2020 and 2023. Bedside and console assistance performances were analyzed separately based on the O-Score and the calculated total numerical sum of the individual item values of the O-Score. Bedside assistance was conducted for upper gastrointestinal, hepatopancreatobiliary, and colorectal procedures, whereas console assistance referred to either one of the three areas. The study participants included inexperienced robotic surgeons who were evaluated by 2 robotic experts.

RESULTS

In total, 273 procedures were included in this study. For 13 bedside assistants, 273 O-Score assessments were identified, and 62 O-Score assessments for six console assistants. Surgical autonomy was achieved in 50.9% for bedside assistance and in 11.3 % for assistance at the robotic console. Surgical autonomy was positively correlated with the O-Score sum for bedside (p = < 0.001) and console assistance (p = 0.004). The positive prediction of surgical autonomy for bedside (console) assistance ranged from 74% (60%) to 93% (100%), correlated with a range of the O-Score sum between 37 (37) and 40 (40) and a robotic caseload between 19 (17) and 33 (24) procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

A significant improvement in the basic robotic performance was observed. Benchmarks regarding number of cases and O-Score sum were established for bedside assistance regardless of the type of visceral robotic operation. Currently, data on console assistance are limited. Monitoring robotic operative skills and skill progression is feasible in daily routine using the O-Score and O-Score sum.

摘要

引言

外科住院医师培训项目缺乏对机器人手术的结构化评估。经过验证的O评分是一种用于跟踪机器人手术操作熟练度的评估工具,由9个项目组成,采用5级李克特量表。手术自主性是一个综合二元项目。本研究旨在确定在机器人内脏手术中实现手术自主性所需的手术例数和O评分总分的基准。

材料与方法

这项单中心前瞻性试点队列研究评估了2020年至2023年期间的机器人手术。根据O评分以及O评分各项目数值的计算总和,分别分析床边和控制台辅助操作的表现。床边辅助用于上消化道、肝胆胰和结直肠手术,而控制台辅助涉及这三个领域中的任何一个。研究参与者包括经验不足的机器人外科医生,由2名机器人专家进行评估。

结果

本研究共纳入273例手术。对于13名床边助手,共进行了273次O评分评估,对6名控制台助手进行了62次O评分评估。床边辅助实现手术自主性的比例为50.9%,控制台辅助为11.3%。手术自主性与床边(p = <0.001)和控制台辅助(p = 0.004)的O评分总和呈正相关。床边(控制台)辅助手术自主性的阳性预测范围为74%(60%)至93%(100%),与O评分总和在37(37)至40(40)之间以及机器人手术量在19(17)至33(24)例之间相关。

结论

观察到机器人基本操作性能有显著改善。无论内脏机器人手术的类型如何,都为床边辅助建立了病例数和O评分总和的基准。目前,关于控制台辅助的数据有限。使用O评分和O评分总和在日常工作中监测机器人手术技能及其进展是可行的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验