Ishak Siti Afida, Aris Ahmad Zaharin, Law Mei Ching, Looi Ley Juen, Abd Karim Murni Marlina
Malaysian Palm Oil Board, 6, Persiaran Institusi, Bandar Baru Bangi, 43000, Kajang, Selangor, Malaysia.
International Institute of Aquaculture and Aquatic Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 71050, Port Dickson, Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia.
Ecotoxicology. 2025 May;34(4):654-665. doi: 10.1007/s10646-025-02866-z. Epub 2025 Mar 12.
Plasticisers are prevalent chemical contaminants that leach from plastics into aquatic ecosystems, posing potential risks to marine life. This study investigated the effects of alternative plasticisers [epoxidised methyl oleate (EMO), di-(2-ethylhexyl) adipate (DEHA), and diisononyl phthalate (DINP)] at 100 µg/L in oysters Crassostrea (Magallana) saidii over 21 days under controlled laboratory conditions. This study focused on changes in body weight, antioxidant enzyme activities such as superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase (CAT), non-enzymatic antioxidant reduced glutathione (GSH), lipid peroxidation (malondialdehyde (MDA) levels) after plasticisers exposure for 7, 14 and 21 days. The results indicated a decline in body weight in DINP-exposed oysters, indicating metabolic alterations. DEHA and DINP showed a pronounced increase in SOD activity at the end of the experiment, indicating elevated oxidative stress. CAT activity increased with EMO exposure, but decreased in oysters treated with DEHA and DINP. GSH levels were inversely proportional to CAT activity. Oysters exposed to DEHA and DINP exhibited higher MDA levels, indicating oxidative lipid damage associated with these plasticisers. Multi-biomarker data were integrated using the Integrated Biomarker Response (IBR) index, which ranked the plasticisers' oxidative stress potential as DEHA > DINP > EMO. The IBR analysis also suggested distinct modes of action among the plasticisers and provided insights into their toxicity mechanisms. Notably, EMO exhibited lower toxicity compared to DEHA and DINP, supporting its potential as a more friendly alternative to conventional plasticisers, albeit not exempt from toxic effects. These insights underscore the importance of environmental risk assessments in the future development of safer chemical alternatives.
增塑剂是普遍存在的化学污染物,会从塑料中渗出进入水生生态系统,对海洋生物构成潜在风险。本研究在可控的实验室条件下,调查了100μg/L的替代增塑剂[环氧油酸甲酯(EMO)、己二酸二(2-乙基己基)酯(DEHA)和邻苯二甲酸二异壬酯(DINP)]对长牡蛎(Crassostrea (Magallana) saidii)21天的影响。本研究重点关注了增塑剂暴露7天、14天和21天后,牡蛎体重的变化、超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)和过氧化氢酶(CAT)等抗氧化酶活性、非酶抗氧化剂还原型谷胱甘肽(GSH)以及脂质过氧化(丙二醛(MDA)水平)。结果表明,暴露于DINP的牡蛎体重下降,表明代谢发生改变。DEHA和DINP在实验结束时SOD活性显著增加,表明氧化应激升高。EMO暴露使CAT活性增加,但DEHA和DINP处理的牡蛎中CAT活性降低。GSH水平与CAT活性成反比。暴露于DEHA和DINP的牡蛎MDA水平较高,表明与这些增塑剂相关的脂质氧化损伤。使用综合生物标志物响应(IBR)指数整合多生物标志物数据,该指数将增塑剂的氧化应激潜力排序为DEHA>DINP>EMO。IBR分析还表明增塑剂之间存在不同的作用模式,并深入了解了它们的毒性机制。值得注意的是,与DEHA和DINP相比,EMO的毒性较低,这支持了它作为传统增塑剂更友好替代品的潜力,尽管它也并非没有毒性作用。这些见解强调了环境风险评估在更安全化学替代品未来发展中的重要性。