Yang Xuan, Li Lynn Ling, Jiang Jingjing, Ying Jianfen
Research Studio of Digital Intelligence and Humanities in College of Foreign Languages, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua, China.
BMC Psychol. 2025 Mar 12;13(1):234. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-02569-4.
With blended learning boosting explosively, learning satisfaction is confronted with challenges. Aiming at its enhancement, teacher support, an essential element of instruction, was investigated.
To pinpoint the dynamics between teacher support and learning satisfaction, 376 university students who participated in blended English learning were involved in self-report questionnaires. A variable-centered approach for data analysis was employed to examine the chain mediation model, and a person-centered one was utilized for exploring more personalized learning patterns of the samples.
The variable-centered investigation validated the hypothesized chain mediation model. SDT motivation and learning engagement were two successful mediators, and they also formed an effective chain mediator between teacher support and learning satisfaction. The person-centered study analyzed teacher support and learning satisfaction reported, and identified three latent profiles: below-average-both, average-both, and high-both profile. Learners in different profiles were spotted with disparate traits, with those in high-both profile presenting the most favorable results.
This study addresses the gap in research on the four variables from a blended learning perspective, and innovatively combines variable-centered and person-centered analytical approaches, providing customized enlightenments into fostering students' progress. Pedagogical implications are part of discussion.
随着混合式学习的迅猛发展,学习满意度面临挑战。为提高学习满意度,对教学的关键要素——教师支持进行了研究。
为明确教师支持与学习满意度之间的动态关系,376名参与混合式英语学习的大学生填写了自我报告问卷。采用以变量为中心的数据分析方法检验链式中介模型,并采用以个体为中心的方法探索样本更具个性化的学习模式。
以变量为中心的调查验证了假设的链式中介模型。自我决定理论动机和学习投入是两个成功的中介变量,它们还在教师支持和学习满意度之间形成了有效的链式中介。以个体为中心的研究分析了报告的教师支持和学习满意度,并识别出三种潜在类型:双低型、双平均型和双高型。不同类型的学习者具有不同的特征,双高型学习者的表现最为理想。
本研究从混合式学习的角度填补了这四个变量研究的空白,并创新性地结合了以变量为中心和以个体为中心的分析方法,为促进学生进步提供了定制化的启示。教学启示是讨论的一部分。