Tsolakidis Dimitrios, Kyziridis Dimitrios, Panoskaltsis Theodoros, Kalakonas Apostolos, Theodoulidis Vasileios, Chatzistamatiou Kimon, Zouzoulas Dimitrios, Tentes Antonios-Apostolos
1st Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 56429 Thessaloniki, Greece.
Surgical Department of Peritoneal Surface Malignancy Program, EUROMEDICA Kyanous Stavros, 54636 Thessaloniki, Greece.
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Mar 6;17(5):904. doi: 10.3390/cancers17050904.
Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) was revealed as a promising adjunct to cytoreductive surgery (CRS) in the treatment of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). This review evaluated the impact HIPEC had on survival outcomes, recurrence patterns and safety in patients that underwent HIPEC in conjunction with interval and secondary CRS for advanced and recurrent ovarian cancer. A thorough search was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar to identify relevant studies published until 1 January 2025. The studies were assessed for survival outcomes, recurrence patterns, safety, and quality of life. The risk of bias was evaluated using the ROB 2 tool for randomized and ROBINS-I for non-randomized articles. The results are presented narratively, highlighting key findings, comparing results and assessing inconsistencies and limitations. HIPEC demonstrated significant improvements in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), particularly in cases with optimal cytoreduction (CC-0/CC-1). The recurrence patterns showed a reduction in peritoneal dissemination with HIPEC, although extraperitoneal recurrences were reported in some cases. Most studies reported comparable morbidity rates between HIPEC and non-HIPEC groups, with acceptable safety profiles. The variability in the HIPEC protocols and the limited quality-of-life and cost-effectiveness data were noteworthy limitations. HIPEC, when performed during interval or secondary CRS, offers survival benefits and can modify recurrence patterns in advanced EOC, although challenges related to protocol standardization, patient selection, and long-term outcomes persist. Future research should focus on multicenter trials with uniform protocols, long follow-up periods and patient-centered outcomes to further validate the role of HIPEC in clinical practice.
热灌注腹腔化疗(HIPEC)被证明是晚期上皮性卵巢癌(EOC)细胞减灭术(CRS)的一种有前景的辅助治疗方法。本综述评估了HIPEC对接受HIPEC联合间歇性和二次CRS治疗晚期和复发性卵巢癌患者的生存结局、复发模式和安全性的影响。通过使用PubMed、Scopus、Cochrane图书馆和谷歌学术进行全面检索,以识别截至2025年1月1日发表的相关研究。对这些研究的生存结局、复发模式、安全性和生活质量进行了评估。使用ROB 2工具评估随机对照文章的偏倚风险,使用ROBINS - I工具评估非随机文章的偏倚风险。结果采用叙述性方式呈现,突出关键发现,比较结果并评估不一致性和局限性。HIPEC在无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)方面显示出显著改善,尤其是在细胞减灭效果最佳(CC - 0/CC - 1)的病例中。复发模式显示HIPEC可减少腹膜播散,尽管在某些病例中报告了腹膜外复发。大多数研究报告HIPEC组和非HIPEC组的发病率相当,安全性良好。HIPEC方案的变异性以及有限的生活质量和成本效益数据是值得注意的局限性。在间歇性或二次CRS期间进行HIPEC,可为晚期EOC患者带来生存益处并可改变复发模式,尽管与方案标准化、患者选择和长期结局相关的挑战仍然存在。未来的研究应侧重于采用统一方案、长期随访期和以患者为中心结局的多中心试验,以进一步验证HIPEC在临床实践中的作用。