Anastasiou Vasileios, Papazoglou Andreas S, Daios Stylianos, Moysidis Dimitrios V, Tsiartas Eirinaios, Didagelos Matthaios, Dimitriadis Kyriakos, Karamitsos Theodoros, Giannakoulas George, Tsioufis Konstantinos, Ziakas Antonios, Kamperidis Vasileios
1st Department of Cardiology, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54636 Thessaloniki, Greece.
Athens Naval Hospital, 11521 Athens, Greece.
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Mar 1;15(5):598. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15050598.
Randomized evidence on the role of heart failure guideline-directed medical therapy for patients with functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) is lacking. The present meta-analysis sought to investigate the prognostic impact of different pharmacotherapy categories recommended in heart failure on subjects with FMR. A systematic literature review was conducted to identify studies reporting the association of renin angiotensin system inhibitors (RASi), beta-blockers (BB), and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA) with outcomes in FMR. A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted to quantify the unadjusted and adjusted hazard ratios [(a)HRs] for all-cause death and the composite outcome in each medical category. Twelve studies with 6,715 FMR patients were included. The use of RASi and BB was associated with a significantly lower risk of all-cause mortality (HR 0.52 [0.39-0.68]; < 0.00001, I = 62% and HR 0.62 [0.49-0.77]; < 0.0001, I = 44%, respectively) and the composite outcome (HR 0.54 [0.44-0.67]; < 0.00001, I = 33% and HR 0.62 [0.52-0.75], < 0.00001, I = 35%, respectively) in unadjusted models. Both RASi (aHR 0.73 [0.56-0.95], = 0.02, I = 52%) and BB (aHR 0.60 [0.41-0.88], = 0.009, I = 55%) retained their association with the composite outcome in pooled adjusted models. The prognostic benefit of using RASi or BB was retained in subgroup analyses including only (1) patients with moderate or severe FMR and (2) patients with reduced or mildly reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. MRA did not demonstrate a significant association with improved outcomes. RASi and BB administration appear to have a favorable prognostic impact on patients with FMR, regardless of the severity of regurgitation.
关于心力衰竭指南指导的药物治疗对功能性二尖瓣反流(FMR)患者作用的随机证据尚缺。本荟萃分析旨在研究心力衰竭中推荐的不同药物治疗类别对FMR患者的预后影响。进行了一项系统的文献综述,以确定报告肾素 - 血管紧张素系统抑制剂(RASi)、β受体阻滞剂(BB)和盐皮质激素受体拮抗剂(MRA)与FMR患者预后相关性的研究。进行随机效应荟萃分析,以量化各药物类别中全因死亡和复合结局的未调整及调整后风险比[(a)HRs]。纳入了12项涉及6715例FMR患者的研究。在未调整模型中,使用RASi和BB与全因死亡率显著降低相关(HR 0.52 [0.39 - 0.68];P < 0.00001,I² = 62%和HR 0.62 [0.49 - 0.77];P < 0.0001,I² = 44%,分别)以及与复合结局相关(HR 0.54 [0.44 - 0.67];P < 0.00001,I² = 33%和HR 0.62 [0.52 - 0.75],P < 0.00001,I² = 35%,分别)。在汇总调整模型中,RASi(aHR 0.73 [0.56 - 0.95],P = 0.02,I² = 52%)和BB(aHR 0.60 [0.41 - 0.88],P = 0.009,I² = 55%)均与复合结局保持相关性。在仅包括(1)中度或重度FMR患者和(2)左心室射血分数降低或轻度降低患者的亚组分析中,使用RASi或BB的预后益处得以保留。MRA未显示与改善结局存在显著相关性。无论反流严重程度如何,给予RASi和BB似乎对FMR患者具有良好的预后影响。