Nelson Chase T, Shaffrey Isabel, Satalich James, Hopper Haleigh, O'Neill Conor, Edge Carl, Ernst Brady, Vanderbeck Jennifer L
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, VA, USA.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University Hospital, Durham, NC, USA.
Clin Shoulder Elb. 2025 Mar;28(1):77-84. doi: 10.5397/cise.2024.00766. Epub 2025 Feb 10.
Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) has become increasingly popular in recent years, and this trend is expected to continue. However, differences in outcomes of RTSA for fractures compared with other indications are poorly understood. This study aimed to identify the compare the incidences of adverse events during RTSA to treat cuff tear arthropathy (CTA) versus RTSA to treat fractures, as well as identify risk factors for any adverse event.
Patients who underwent RTSA from 2010 to 2020 in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database were included. Matched cohorts were created using nearest-neighbor matching. Independent sample t-tests and chi-square tests were used to determine differences between groups, and binary logistic regression was performed to determine odds ratios and 95% CIs.
In total, 27,607 CTA patients (94.5%) and 1,537 fracture patients (5.3%) underwent RTSA. Adverse events occurred in 1,088 CTA patients (3.9%) and 192 fracture patients (12.4%). Incidences of adverse events, postoperative transfusions, and returns to an operating room were all significantly higher in the fracture cohort compared with CTA patients.
Following surgery, higher rates of adverse events were observed in the CTA patients compared with those in the fracture cohort. These findings improve our understanding of the effectiveness of an increasingly popular surgical intervention due to the use of a large database analysis to identify short-term complications and risk factors. Level of evidence: III.
近年来,反式全肩关节置换术(RTSA)越来越受欢迎,且这一趋势预计将持续下去。然而,与其他适应症相比,RTSA治疗骨折的疗效差异尚不清楚。本研究旨在确定并比较RTSA治疗肩袖撕裂性关节病(CTA)与治疗骨折时不良事件的发生率,并确定任何不良事件的风险因素。
纳入2010年至2020年在国家外科质量改进计划数据库中接受RTSA手术的患者。使用最近邻匹配法创建匹配队列。采用独立样本t检验和卡方检验确定组间差异,并进行二元逻辑回归以确定比值比和95%置信区间。
共有27607例CTA患者(94.5%)和1537例骨折患者(5.3%)接受了RTSA手术。1088例CTA患者(3.9%)和192例骨折患者(12.4%)发生了不良事件。与CTA患者相比,骨折队列中不良事件、术后输血和返回手术室的发生率均显著更高。
与骨折队列相比,CTA患者术后不良事件发生率更高。这些发现通过使用大型数据库分析来识别短期并发症和风险因素,提高了我们对这种日益流行的手术干预有效性的理解。证据级别:III级。