Rowland Samantha N, Da Boit Mariasole, Tan Rachel, Heaney Liam M, Bailey Stephen J
Women in Sport Research and Innovation Hub, School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK.
Health and Life Sciences, School of Allied Health Sciences, De Montfort University, Leicester, UK.
Exp Physiol. 2025 Mar 12;110(8):1032-7. doi: 10.1113/EP092415.
Serum measurements of 17β-estradiol and progesterone are widely used to verify menstrual cycle status and confirm contraceptive use, often through commercially available immunoassay kits. However, no studies have investigated whether blood collection tube chemistries influence hormone concentrations in young females, despite assays permitting the use of different biofluids with similar reference ranges. In this study, venous blood was sampled from physically active females (n = 25) using Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and serum vacutainers, and 17β-estradiol and progesterone concentrations were measured using competitive immunoenzymatic assays. Median plasma concentrations of 17β-estradiol and progesterone were 44.2% (plasma 40.75 vs. serum 28.25 pg/ml) and 78.9% (plasma 1.70 vs. serum 0.95 ng/ml) higher than serum concentrations, respectively (P < 0.001 for both). Strong positive correlations were observed between plasma and serum concentrations for 17β-estradiol (r = 0.72; P < 0.001) and progesterone (r = 0.89; P < 0.001). The mean bias and limits of agreement for plasma versus serum were 12.5 pg/ml (-20.6 to 45.5 pg/ml) for 17β-estradiol and 1.01 ng/ml (-5.6 to 7.6 ng/ml) for progesterone. Ovarian hormone levels were consistently higher in EDTA plasma compared with serum, with these matrices not yielding statistically equivalent results. Despite these differences, the strong correlations and good agreement suggest that both matrices are suitable for biomarker analysis. Researchers using EDTA plasma should account for the higher hormone concentrations when applying inclusion or exclusion criteria, because adjustments might be necessary to ensure appropriate participant classification.
血清17β-雌二醇和孕酮的检测广泛用于验证月经周期状态及确认是否使用避孕药,通常是通过市售免疫分析试剂盒来进行。然而,尽管检测允许使用具有相似参考范围的不同生物流体,但尚无研究调查采血试管成分是否会影响年轻女性的激素浓度。在本研究中,使用乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)采血管和血清真空采血管从身体活跃的女性(n = 25)中采集静脉血,并采用竞争性免疫酶法检测17β-雌二醇和孕酮浓度。17β-雌二醇和孕酮的血浆中位数浓度分别比血清浓度高44.2%(血浆40.75 vs. 血清28.25 pg/ml)和78.9%(血浆1.70 vs. 血清0.95 ng/ml)(两者P均<0.001)。17β-雌二醇(r = 0.72;P < 0.001)和孕酮(r = 0.89;P < 0.001)的血浆浓度与血清浓度之间均观察到强正相关。17β-雌二醇血浆与血清的平均偏差和一致性界限为12.5 pg/ml(-20.6至45.5 pg/ml),孕酮为1.01 ng/ml(-5.6至7.6 ng/ml)。与血清相比,EDTA血浆中的卵巢激素水平始终较高,这些基质未产生统计学上等效的结果。尽管存在这些差异,但强相关性和良好的一致性表明这两种基质均适用于生物标志物分析。使用EDTA血浆的研究人员在应用纳入或排除标准时应考虑较高的激素浓度,因为可能需要进行调整以确保对参与者进行适当分类。