Kldiashvili Ekaterina, Abiatari Ivane, Zarnadze Maia
Petre Shotadze Tbilisi Medical Academy Tbilisi Georgia.
School of Medicine Ilia State University Tbilisi Georgia.
Health Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 11;8(3):e70562. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.70562. eCollection 2025 Mar.
Traditional teaching methods in medical education often fail to engage students or foster critical research skills required for evidence-based medicine. Project-based learning (PBL) is widely recognized for promoting active learning and improving academic performance, although its application in research-focused medical courses remains underexplored, especially in low-resource settings. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of PBL in enhancing academic performance and originality compared to traditional literature review-based assessments.
A quasi-experimental study was conducted between March 11, 2024 and May 31, 2024, with 179 twelfth-semester medical students divided into two groups: the experimental group (PBL approach, = 108) and the control group (literature review-based approach, = 71). Students in the PBL group completed the full research cycle, including topic selection, data collection, analysis, research paper formulation, while the control group focused on synthesizing existing literature. Academic performance (course grades) and originality (Turnitin similarity percentage) were measured. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and independent samples -tests, with a significance threshold of < 0.01.
The PBL group demonstrated significantly higher academic performance (mean: 82.5, median: 85) compared to the control group (mean: 66.5, median: 63.75; (177) = -20.53, < 0.01). Similarly, originality improved significantly in the PBL group, with lower similarity scores (mean: 4.17%, median: 4.5%) than the control group (mean: 12.62%, median: 13%, (177) = 13.74, < 0.01). Variability in academic performance was slightly higher in the PBL group (standard deviation: 5.80 vs 4.81), reflecting the individualized nature of PBL.
This study confirms that PBL significantly enhances academic performance and fosters originality among medical students, particularly in research-focused courses. The findings underscore the potential of PBL as a transformative approach to medical education, addressing gaps in traditional methods while aligning with global trends in evidence-based practice and academic integrity. PBL is recommended as an adaptable and effective strategy, especially in resource-limited educational settings.
医学教育中的传统教学方法常常无法吸引学生参与,也难以培养循证医学所需的批判性研究技能。基于项目的学习(PBL)因能促进主动学习并提高学业成绩而广受认可,尽管其在以研究为重点的医学课程中的应用仍未得到充分探索,尤其是在资源匮乏的环境中。本研究旨在评估与传统的基于文献综述的评估相比,PBL在提高学业成绩和原创性方面的有效性。
于2024年3月11日至2024年5月31日进行了一项准实验研究,179名十二年级医学生被分为两组:实验组(PBL方法,n = 108)和对照组(基于文献综述的方法,n = 71)。PBL组的学生完成了完整的研究周期,包括主题选择、数据收集、分析、研究论文撰写,而对照组则专注于综合现有文献。测量了学业成绩(课程成绩)和原创性(Turnitin相似度百分比)。使用描述性统计和独立样本t检验对数据进行分析,显著性阈值为p < 0.01。
与对照组(均值:66.5,中位数:63.75;t(177) = -20.53,p < 0.01)相比,PBL组的学业成绩显著更高(均值:82.5,中位数:85)。同样,PBL组的原创性也显著提高,相似度得分(均值:4.17%,中位数:4.5%)低于对照组(均值:12.62%,中位数:13%,t(177) = 13.74,p < 0.01)。PBL组学业成绩的变异性略高(标准差:5.80对4.81),反映了PBL的个性化性质。
本研究证实,PBL能显著提高医学生的学业成绩并培养其原创性,尤其是在以研究为重点的课程中。研究结果强调了PBL作为医学教育变革性方法的潜力,弥补了传统方法的不足,同时符合循证实践和学术诚信的全球趋势。建议将PBL作为一种适应性强且有效的策略,尤其是在资源有限的教育环境中。