Lim William K
Department of Paraclinical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, Kota Samarahan, Sarawak, 94300, Malaysia.
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2023 Dec 28;14:1453-1460. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S444566. eCollection 2023.
The introduction of problem-based learning (PBL) in 1969 is considered the greatest innovation in medical education of the past 50 years. Since then, PBL has been implemented in different educational settings across virtually all health professions. However, some PBL schools gradually faced resistance from academic staff who were more familiar with traditional teacher-centred curricula. At times this has resulted in reversion to tradition or compromise whereby PBL is implemented within a lecture-based curriculum. Resistance can also emerge in a traditional school when a PBL curriculum is being considered for implementation. One of the first signs of this erosion is doubts about PBL raised in the form of objections or criticisms. This perspective review describes eight objections raised to assert why PBL is inferior or untenable. The background to each objection is provided together with evidence-informed rebuttals derived from professional practice and the published literature. Best practices are discussed for sustainable management of a PBL-based curriculum. A well-implemented PBL curriculum with appropriate and cost-effective infrastructure, training, teaching-learning activities, and assessment will position schools to harness the full benefit of PBL in training medical and health professionals.
1969年问题式学习(PBL)的引入被认为是过去50年医学教育中最伟大的创新。从那时起,PBL已在几乎所有卫生专业的不同教育环境中实施。然而,一些采用PBL的学校逐渐面临来自更熟悉传统以教师为中心课程的学术人员的抵制。有时这导致回归传统或采取折衷办法,即在基于讲座的课程中实施PBL。当传统学校考虑实施PBL课程时,也可能出现抵制。这种侵蚀的最初迹象之一是以反对或批评的形式对PBL提出的质疑。这篇观点综述描述了提出的八个反对意见,以断言为什么PBL较差或不可行。为每个反对意见提供了背景,并给出了基于专业实践和已发表文献的有循证依据的反驳。讨论了基于PBL的课程可持续管理的最佳实践。一个实施良好的PBL课程,具备适当且具有成本效益的基础设施、培训、教学活动和评估,将使学校能够充分利用PBL在培养医学和卫生专业人员方面的优势。