Xing Mingliang, Tong Liping, Duan Hongtao, Aliev Dennis, Dong Xiaoping, Zhang Yong, Liu Huifeng, Yan Xiaolong
Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Section of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Visceral-, Transplant-, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
J Thorac Dis. 2025 Feb 28;17(2):1042-1053. doi: 10.21037/jtd-2025-45. Epub 2025 Feb 27.
With increasing early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) diagnoses, sublobar resections including segmentectomy and wedge resection have become commonly used in clinical settings. The success of lung segment surgery hinges on the accurate identification of intersegmental planes (ISPs), which is typically achieved by the modified inflation-deflation method; however, this technique is associated with a prolonged duration for identifying ISP. The "partial pressure of oxygen control method" represents an optimization of the inflation-deflation technique, designed to facilitate rapid identification of ISP during surgical procedures. The present study was designed to assess the safety and effectiveness of the partial pressure of oxygen (PaO) control method for ISP identification in thoracoscopic anatomical sublobectomy, in comparison to the modified inflation-deflation method.
A total of 60 patients scheduled for thoracoscopic anatomical sublobectomy were randomly allocated into two groups: the intervention group (using the PaO control method; n=30) and the control group (using the modified inflation-deflation method; n=30). The time to ISP appearance (T) was compared between these two groups. Arterial blood gas (ABG) levels were recorded at the following time points: prior to entry to operating room, during one-lung ventilation (OLV), upon completion of lung inflation, 3 minutes post-lung inflation, and 6 minutes post-lung inflation. Statistical analyses were conducted to evaluate the differences in operative time, intraoperative blood loss, incidence of postoperative complications, and average postoperative hospital stay.
The T was significantly shorter in the intervention group than in the control group (307.0±108.3 496.7±154.0 seconds; P<0.001). Furthermore, the PaO in the intervention group was significantly lower compared to the control group at 3 minutes following 100% oxygen administration (156.6±76.5 114.1±47.5 mmHg; P=0.01).
The PaO control method facilitates more rapid acquisition of ISP compared to the modified inflation-deflation method, and it is deemed a safe and effective technique in thoracoscopic anatomical sublobectomy.
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06644066.
随着早期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)诊断数量的增加,包括肺段切除术和楔形切除术在内的肺叶下切除已在临床中普遍应用。肺段手术的成功取决于节段间平面(ISP)的准确识别,这通常通过改良的膨胀-萎陷法实现;然而,该技术识别ISP的时间较长。“氧分压控制法”是对膨胀-萎陷技术的优化,旨在便于在手术过程中快速识别ISP。本研究旨在评估与改良的膨胀-萎陷法相比,氧分压(PaO)控制法在胸腔镜解剖性肺叶下切除术中识别ISP的安全性和有效性。
总共60例计划进行胸腔镜解剖性肺叶下切除术的患者被随机分为两组:干预组(采用PaO控制法;n = 30)和对照组(采用改良的膨胀-萎陷法;n = 30)。比较两组出现ISP的时间(T)。在以下时间点记录动脉血气(ABG)水平:进入手术室前、单肺通气(OLV)期间、肺膨胀完成时、肺膨胀后3分钟和肺膨胀后6分钟。进行统计分析以评估手术时间、术中出血量、术后并发症发生率和术后平均住院时间的差异。
干预组的T明显短于对照组(307.0±108.3对496.7±154.0秒;P < 0.001)。此外,在给予100%氧气后3分钟,干预组的PaO明显低于对照组(156.6±76.5对114.1±47.5 mmHg;P = 0.01)。
与改良的膨胀-萎陷法相比,PaO控制法能更快速地识别ISP,并且在胸腔镜解剖性肺叶下切除术中被认为是一种安全有效的技术。
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06644066。