• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经动脉化疗栓塞术与肝动脉灌注化疗作为伴有大血管侵犯的肝细胞癌的一线治疗方法比较

Transarterial chemoembolization versus hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy as first treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma with macrovascular invasion.

作者信息

He Benyi, Deng Min, Li Shaohua, Mei Jie, Lu Lianghe, Zuo Zhijun, Guo Rongping, Wei Wei

机构信息

Department of Liver Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, China.

State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, China.

出版信息

Int J Med Sci. 2025 Feb 24;22(6):1415-1424. doi: 10.7150/ijms.108144. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.7150/ijms.108144
PMID:40084258
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11898842/
Abstract

Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is an optional treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with macrovascular invasion (MVI) and without extrahepatic metastasis (EHM). As a recently emerging approach, the efficacy of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) compared with TACE in this group of patients is unclear. Between December 2016 and June 2020, patients diagnosed with HCC with MVI and without EHM who underwent TACE (n=91) or HAIC (n=190) as their initial treatment were included. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to reduce selection bias and other imbalances. The objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), rate of subsequent resection, and safety were compared between groups. Seventy-seven pairs of patients were matched after PSM. The ORR was higher in the HAIC group than that in the TACE group (29.9% vs. 9.1%, = 0.013). The median PFS of patients in the HAIC group was longer than that of the patients in the TACE group (4.7 vs. 1.4 months, = 0.002), but there was no significant difference in the median OS between the groups (19.6 vs. 18.1 months, = 0.122). HAIC also showed a better safety profile than TACE. HAIC is an effective and safe option for treating HCC patients with MVI and without EHM compared to TACE.

摘要

经动脉化疗栓塞术(TACE)是伴有大血管侵犯(MVI)且无肝外转移(EHM)的肝细胞癌(HCC)患者的一种可选治疗方法。作为一种新兴的治疗方法,在这组患者中,肝动脉灌注化疗(HAIC)与TACE相比的疗效尚不清楚。2016年12月至2020年6月,纳入了初始治疗接受TACE(n = 91)或HAIC(n = 190)的诊断为伴有MVI且无EHM的HCC患者。采用倾向评分匹配(PSM)来减少选择偏倚和其他不均衡性。比较两组之间的客观缓解率(ORR)、总生存期(OS)、无进展生存期(PFS)、后续切除率和安全性。PSM后匹配了77对患者。HAIC组的ORR高于TACE组(29.9%对9.1%,P = 0.013)。HAIC组患者的中位PFS长于TACE组患者(4.7对1.4个月,P = 0.002),但两组之间的中位OS无显著差异(19.6对18.1个月,P = 0.122)。HAIC也显示出比TACE更好的安全性。与TACE相比,HAIC是治疗伴有MVI且无EHM的HCC患者的一种有效且安全的选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4210/11898842/e55230e64cf1/ijmsv22p1415g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4210/11898842/ae00428f7bfb/ijmsv22p1415g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4210/11898842/e55230e64cf1/ijmsv22p1415g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4210/11898842/ae00428f7bfb/ijmsv22p1415g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4210/11898842/e55230e64cf1/ijmsv22p1415g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Transarterial chemoembolization versus hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy as first treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma with macrovascular invasion.经动脉化疗栓塞术与肝动脉灌注化疗作为伴有大血管侵犯的肝细胞癌的一线治疗方法比较
Int J Med Sci. 2025 Feb 24;22(6):1415-1424. doi: 10.7150/ijms.108144. eCollection 2025.
2
Lenvatinib plus drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization with/without hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma larger than 7 cm with major portal vein tumor thrombosis: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.乐伐替尼联合载药微球经动脉化疗栓塞术联合或不联合肝动脉灌注化疗治疗直径大于7cm且伴有主要门静脉肿瘤血栓形成的肝细胞癌:一项多中心回顾性队列研究
Int J Surg. 2024 Dec 1;110(12):7860-7870. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001819.
3
Efficacy and safety of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy followed by transarterial embolization for hepatocellular carcinoma.肝动脉灌注化疗后行经动脉栓塞术治疗肝细胞癌的疗效与安全性
Tumori. 2025 Apr;111(2):158-163. doi: 10.1177/03008916251327830. Epub 2025 Mar 18.
4
[Efficacy and safety of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization followed by hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy combined with TKI and PD-1 inhibitors as first-line treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma].经动脉化疗栓塞术序贯肝动脉灌注化疗联合TKI和PD-1抑制剂作为晚期肝细胞癌一线治疗的疗效与安全性
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2024 Sep 20;44(9):1831-1838. doi: 10.12122/j.issn.1673-4254.2024.09.24.
5
Comparison of clinical outcome of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy and sorafenib for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma according to macrovascular invasion and transcatheter arterial chemoembolization refractory status.比较有大血管侵犯和经导管动脉化疗栓塞耐药状态的晚期肝细胞癌患者行肝动脉灌注化疗和索拉非尼治疗的临床结局。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Oct;33(10):1780-1786. doi: 10.1111/jgh.14152. Epub 2018 May 10.
6
Hepatic Arterial Infusion of Oxaliplatin, Fluorouracil, and Leucovorin Versus Transarterial Chemoembolization for Large Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Randomized Phase III Trial.奥沙利铂、氟尿嘧啶和亚叶酸钙肝动脉灌注与经动脉化疗栓塞治疗大肝细胞癌的随机III期试验
J Clin Oncol. 2022 Jan 10;40(2):150-160. doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.00608. Epub 2021 Oct 14.
7
Hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy using mFOLFOX versus transarterial chemoembolization for massive unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a prospective non-randomized study.使用改良FOLFOX方案的肝动脉灌注化疗与经动脉化疗栓塞术治疗巨大不可切除肝细胞癌的前瞻性非随机研究。
Chin J Cancer. 2017 Oct 23;36(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s40880-017-0251-2.
8
Combination Therapy of Chemoembolization and Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy in Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Portal Vein Tumor Thrombosis Compared with Chemoembolization Alone: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.经动脉化疗栓塞联合肝动脉灌注化疗与单纯经动脉化疗栓塞治疗合并门静脉癌栓肝细胞癌的疗效比较:倾向评分匹配分析。
Biomed Res Int. 2021 Jul 14;2021:6670367. doi: 10.1155/2021/6670367. eCollection 2021.
9
Efficiency and safety of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) combined with anti-PD1 therapy versus HAIC monotherapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A multicenter propensity score matching analysis.肝动脉灌注化疗(HAIC)联合抗 PD-1 治疗与 HAIC 单药治疗晚期肝细胞癌的疗效和安全性:一项多中心倾向评分匹配分析。
Cancer Med. 2024 Jan;13(1):e6836. doi: 10.1002/cam4.6836. Epub 2024 Jan 9.
10
The safety and efficacy of tyrosine kinase inhibitors and programmed cell death protein- 1 inhibitors combined with HAIC/TACE in the treatment of recurrent unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.酪氨酸激酶抑制剂和程序性细胞死亡蛋白1抑制剂联合肝动脉灌注化疗/经动脉化疗栓塞术治疗复发性不可切除肝细胞癌的安全性和疗效
BMC Cancer. 2025 Apr 25;25(1):779. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-14185-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Oxaliplatin induces pyroptosis in hepatoma cells and enhances antitumor immunity against hepatocellular carcinoma.奥沙利铂诱导肝癌细胞发生焦亡并增强对肝细胞癌的抗肿瘤免疫力。
Br J Cancer. 2025 Mar;132(4):371-383. doi: 10.1038/s41416-024-02908-z. Epub 2025 Jan 2.
2
Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy-based conversion hepatectomy in responders versus nonresponders with hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicenter cohort study.基于肝动脉灌注化疗的转化性肝切除术治疗肝细胞癌反应者与无反应者:一项多中心队列研究
Int J Surg. 2025 Jan 1;111(1):135-145. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000002043.
3
Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy versus transarterial chemoembolization, potential conversion therapies for single huge hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective comparison study.
肝动脉灌注化疗与经肝动脉化疗栓塞治疗单个巨大肝癌的潜在转化治疗:一项回顾性比较研究。
Int J Surg. 2023 Nov 1;109(11):3303-3311. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000654.
4
Nomograms for predicting the recurrence probability and recurrence-free survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after conversion hepatectomy based on hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy: a multicenter, retrospective study.基于肝动脉灌注化疗的肝癌转化切除术后复发概率和无复发生存率预测的列线图:一项多中心回顾性研究。
Int J Surg. 2023 May 1;109(5):1299-1310. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000376.
5
Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy versus transarterial chemoembolization for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review with meta-analysis.肝动脉灌注化疗与经动脉化疗栓塞术治疗不可切除肝细胞癌的比较:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022 Sep 27;10:1010824. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.1010824. eCollection 2022.
6
[Standardization for diagnosis and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (2022 edition)].《肝细胞癌诊疗规范(2022年版)》
Zhonghua Gan Zang Bing Za Zhi. 2022 Apr 20;30(4):367-388. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501113-20220413-00193.
7
Transarterial infusion chemotherapy with FOLFOX for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a multi-center propensity score matched analysis of real-world practice.采用FOLFOX方案经动脉灌注化疗治疗晚期肝细胞癌:一项多中心倾向评分匹配的真实世界实践分析
Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2021 Oct;10(5):631-645. doi: 10.21037/hbsn.2020.03.14.
8
Hepatic Arterial Infusion of Oxaliplatin, Fluorouracil, and Leucovorin Versus Transarterial Chemoembolization for Large Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Randomized Phase III Trial.奥沙利铂、氟尿嘧啶和亚叶酸钙肝动脉灌注与经动脉化疗栓塞治疗大肝细胞癌的随机III期试验
J Clin Oncol. 2022 Jan 10;40(2):150-160. doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.00608. Epub 2021 Oct 14.
9
Hepatic Artery Infusion Chemotherapy Using Fluorouracil, Leucovorin, and Oxaliplatin versus Transarterial Chemoembolization as Initial Treatment for Locally Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Propensity Score-Matching Analysis.氟尿嘧啶、亚叶酸钙和奥沙利铂肝动脉灌注化疗与经动脉化疗栓塞作为局部进展期肝细胞癌初始治疗的比较:倾向评分匹配分析。
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2021 Sep;32(9):1267-1276.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2021.06.008. Epub 2021 Jun 22.
10
Hepatobiliary Cancers, Version 2.2021, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.肝胆肿瘤,2.2021 年版,NCCN 肿瘤学临床实践指南。
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2021 May 1;19(5):541-565. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2021.0022.