Zhao Pengcheng, Jiang Qiaoqi, Xue Kang, Liu Xiaofeng, Tian Bole
Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children (Sichuan University), Ministry of Education, West China Second Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Department of Pediatric Surgery, West China Second Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Front Surg. 2025 Feb 27;12:1535212. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1535212. eCollection 2025.
Because of the high rate of recurrence, the prognosis of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is still very poor despite underwent pancreatectomy and adjuvant chemotherapy. A few reports have suggested the feasibility and efficacy of surgical resection for pulmonary metastases of PDAC. However, the role of metastasectomy of recurrent PDAC remains controversial. The aim of this study is to evaluate the benefits of pulmonary metastasectomy in PDAC patients with lung metastases.
We searched the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases and extracted the hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) from eligible studies. Pooled HR with 95% CI were used to reveal the association between pulmonary metastasectomy and survival.
The meta-analysis encompassed data from nine studies, comprising 467 patients suffered PDAC with lung metastasis. The results (the pooled HR: 0.637, 95% CI: 0.531-0.764, = 61.5%, value = 0.008) indicated that patients with lung metastasis who underwent pulmonary metastasectomy seemed to have better survival when compared with patients who underwent only chemotherapy. The robustness of these pooled results was verified by our subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis. Moreover, the varying sample sizes among studies contribute to the heterogeneity in the pooled hazard ratio (HR) for survival, as indicated by the meta-regression analysis ( value = 0.045).
Pulmonary metastasectomy could prolong the survival in patients with lung metastases from PDAC. However, the present study is based on a relatively small number of patients and may include a selection bias. More multi-institutional prospective study is needed to evaluated the clinical value of pulmonary metastasectomy.
由于复发率高,尽管接受了胰腺切除术和辅助化疗,胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)患者的预后仍然很差。一些报告表明,手术切除PDAC肺转移灶具有可行性和有效性。然而,复发性PDAC肺转移灶切除术的作用仍存在争议。本研究的目的是评估肺转移灶切除术对PDAC肺转移患者的益处。
我们检索了PubMed、Embase和Cochrane图书馆数据库,并从符合条件的研究中提取了具有95%置信区间(CI)的风险比(HR)。采用合并的HR及95%CI来揭示肺转移灶切除术与生存率之间的关联。
荟萃分析纳入了9项研究的数据,包括467例发生肺转移的PDAC患者。结果(合并HR:0.637,95%CI:0.531-0.764, = 61.5%, 值 = 0.008)表明,与仅接受化疗的患者相比,接受肺转移灶切除术的肺转移患者似乎具有更好的生存率。我们的亚组分析和敏感性分析验证了这些合并结果的稳健性。此外,荟萃回归分析表明( 值 = 0.045),研究间不同的样本量导致了生存合并风险比(HR)的异质性。
肺转移灶切除术可延长PDAC肺转移患者的生存期。然而,本研究基于相对较少的患者,可能存在选择偏倚。需要更多的多机构前瞻性研究来评估肺转移灶切除术的临床价值。