• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

消化性溃疡病手术后复发性溃疡诊断中的陷阱

Pitfalls in the diagnosis of recurrent ulceration after surgery for peptic ulcer disease.

作者信息

Mosiman F, Donovan I A, Alexander-Williams J

出版信息

J Clin Gastroenterol. 1985 Apr;7(2):133-6. doi: 10.1097/00004836-198504000-00006.

DOI:10.1097/00004836-198504000-00006
PMID:4008908
Abstract

We have studied the accuracy of diagnostic methods in achieving a diagnosis in 75 patients with 81 proven episodes of recurrent ulceration. When the endoscopic findings did not permit an accurate diagnosis, radiology usually provided no additional information. The sensitivity of a combined diagnostic approach was not different from that of endoscopy alone, and so the routine use of upper GI radiographs in addition to endoscopy should, therefore, be abandoned. We also assessed observer variation among endoscopists prospectively in 38 patients investigated for dyspepsia after operation for peptic ulcer. Major observer variation in diagnosing suspected recurrent ulceration occurred in 11% of patients, with a sensitivity and specificity higher than 77 and 94%, respectively. As not all the postoperative gastroduodenojejunal mucosal breaches are peptic, we suggest that acid output and enterogastric reflux assessments are useful diagnostic adjuncts to endoscopy.

摘要

我们研究了诊断方法对75例患者81次确诊复发性溃疡发作进行诊断的准确性。当内镜检查结果无法做出准确诊断时,放射学检查通常也无法提供更多信息。联合诊断方法的敏感性与单纯内镜检查并无差异,因此,除内镜检查外常规使用上消化道造影应予以摒弃。我们还对38例因消化性溃疡手术后消化不良接受检查的患者进行了内镜医师之间观察差异的前瞻性评估。11%的患者在诊断疑似复发性溃疡时存在主要观察差异,其敏感性和特异性分别高于77%和94%。由于并非所有术后胃十二指肠空肠黏膜破损都是消化性的,我们建议胃酸分泌和肠胃反流评估是内镜检查有用的辅助诊断方法。

相似文献

1
Pitfalls in the diagnosis of recurrent ulceration after surgery for peptic ulcer disease.消化性溃疡病手术后复发性溃疡诊断中的陷阱
J Clin Gastroenterol. 1985 Apr;7(2):133-6. doi: 10.1097/00004836-198504000-00006.
2
Endoscopic and radiological assessment of recurrent ulceration after peptic ulcer surgery.消化性溃疡手术后复发性溃疡的内镜及放射学评估
Br J Radiol. 1978 Apr;51(604):257-9. doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-51-604-257.
3
The accuracy of methods of diagnosis in patients with suspected recurrent ulcer after vagotomy.迷走神经切断术后疑似复发性溃疡患者诊断方法的准确性
Aust N Z J Surg. 1975 Aug;45(3):252-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.1975.tb05201.x.
4
Assessment and treatment of recurrent peptic ulceration.复发性消化性溃疡的评估与治疗
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1975 Mar;56(3):135-40.
5
Recurrent ulcers after gastric surgery: endoscopic localization to the gastric mucosa.
Am J Gastroenterol. 1983 May;78(5):269-71.
6
Endoscopic and radiological assessment of recurrent ulceration after peptic ulcer surgery.消化性溃疡手术后复发性溃疡的内镜及放射学评估
Br J Radiol. 1980 Mar;53(627):263-4. doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-53-627-263-b.
7
Symposium on peptic ulcer disease: 3. Practical management of recurrent peptic ulcer.消化性溃疡病研讨会:3. 复发性消化性溃疡的实际管理
Can J Surg. 1978 Jan;21(1):21-4.
8
Observer variation in assessment of results of surgery for peptic ulceration.消化性溃疡手术结果评估中的观察者差异。
Br Med J. 1976 Apr 3;1(6013):814-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.6013.814.
9
Duodenogastric reflux: a cause of gastric mucosal hyperaemia and symptoms after operations for peptic ulceration.十二指肠胃反流:消化性溃疡手术后胃黏膜充血及症状的一个原因。
Gut. 1975 Jan;16(1):28-32. doi: 10.1136/gut.16.1.28.
10
The value of endoscopy and secretion studies in the management of recurrent symptoms after surgery for peptic ulceration.内镜检查和分泌物研究在消化性溃疡手术后复发症状管理中的价值。
J R Coll Surg Edinb. 1973 Sep;18(5):297-302.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation and management of patients with recurrent peptic ulcer disease after acid-reducing operations: a systematic review.抑酸手术后复发性消化性溃疡病患者的评估与管理:一项系统评价
J Gastrointest Surg. 2003 Jul-Aug;7(5):606-26. doi: 10.1016/s1091-255x(02)00034-3.
2
Medical treatment of stomal ulcers.造口溃疡的医学治疗。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1988 Nov;70(6):343-4.