Chawanpaiboon Saifon, Nuanjeen Sunisa, Wayuphak Thitiya, Oncharoen Geeranda, Phuengphaeng Arunee, Pooliam Julaporn
Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, THA.
Cureus. 2025 Feb 12;17(2):e78922. doi: 10.7759/cureus.78922. eCollection 2025 Feb.
Introduction Optimal umbilical cord management at birth plays a crucial role in neonatal outcomes. While delayed cord clamping (DCC) has been associated with improved neonatal haematologic and hemodynamic status, early cord clamping (ECC) remains widely practised. Umbilical cord milking (UCM) has emerged as an alternative to DCC, potentially offering similar benefits while reducing the delay in neonatal resuscitation. This study aims to compare the effects of UCM, ECC, and DCC on neonatal outcomes in term infants born between 37 and 42 weeks of gestation. Methods A total of 225 pregnant women at 37-42 weeks' gestation were randomised into three groups: ECC, UCM, and DCC. Participants delivered by spontaneous vaginal delivery or caesarean section. Newborn haemoglobin, haematocrit, and micro-bilirubin levels were measured within 48 to 72 hours of birth. Maternal demographic data, blood loss volume, newborn Apgar scores at 1 and 5 minutes, neonatal complications, phototherapy requirements, and hospital stay durations were recorded. Baseline maternal characteristics, including antenatal visit counts and haematocrit levels at 32-34 weeks, were similar across groups. Results All three groups of pregnant women had no difference in baseline characteristics, number of antenatal visits and baseline haematocrit in the first visit and during 32-34 weeks of gestation. Haemoglobin and haematocrit between the DCC group (17.35 g/dl (2.18), 48.38% (5.76)), the UCM group (17.34 g/dl (2.09), 48.09% (5.70)) and in the ECC group (16.27 g/dl (1.95), 44.92% (5.080)) were different with statistically significant. Other results, including estimated blood loss, neonatal bilirubin, the requirement of phototherapy, blood exchange and neonatal complications, were not different among the three groups. Conclusion UCM and DCC improve neonatal haematologic parameters compared to ECC, with DCC showing the greatest benefits. However, DCC is associated with a higher risk of neonatal jaundice requiring phototherapy. UCM may serve as a viable alternative when immediate resuscitation is needed. Further research is required to refine optimal cord management strategies.
引言 出生时最佳的脐带处理对新生儿结局起着至关重要的作用。虽然延迟脐带结扎(DCC)与改善新生儿血液学和血流动力学状态有关,但早期脐带结扎(ECC)仍被广泛应用。脐带挤奶(UCM)已成为DCC的一种替代方法,可能提供类似的益处,同时减少新生儿复苏的延迟。本研究旨在比较UCM、ECC和DCC对妊娠37至42周足月出生婴儿的新生儿结局的影响。
方法 总共225名妊娠37 - 42周的孕妇被随机分为三组:ECC组、UCM组和DCC组。参与者通过自然阴道分娩或剖宫产分娩。在出生后48至72小时内测量新生儿血红蛋白、血细胞比容和微量胆红素水平。记录产妇人口统计学数据、失血量、新生儿1分钟和5分钟阿氏评分、新生儿并发症、光疗需求和住院时间。各组产妇的基线特征相似,包括产前检查次数和32 - 34周时的血细胞比容水平。
结果 三组孕妇在基线特征、产前检查次数以及首次就诊和妊娠32 - 34周期间的基线血细胞比容方面均无差异。DCC组(血红蛋白17.35 g/dl(2.18),血细胞比容48.38%(5.76))、UCM组(血红蛋白17.34 g/dl(2.09),血细胞比容48.09%(5.70))和ECC组(血红蛋白16.27 g/dl(1.95),血细胞比容44.92%(5.080))之间的血红蛋白和血细胞比容存在统计学显著差异。其他结果,包括估计失血量、新生儿胆红素、光疗需求、换血需求和新生儿并发症,三组之间无差异。
结论 与ECC相比,UCM和DCC可改善新生儿血液学参数,DCC显示出最大益处。然而,DCC与需要光疗的新生儿黄疸风险较高有关。当需要立即复苏时UCM可能是一种可行的替代方法。需要进一步研究以完善最佳脐带处理策略。