Ahmed Raheel, Behary Paray Nitish, Sawatari Hiroyuki, Wafa Syed Emir Irfan, Ramphul Kamleshun, Ahmed Mushood, Jain Hritvik, Deshpande Saurabh, Khanji Mohammed, Wells Athol Umfrey, Collins Peter, Mohammed Selma, Abou-Ezzeddine Omar, Kouranos Vasilis, Sharma Rakesh, Chahal Anwar
Cardiac Sarcoidosis Services, Royal Brompton Hospital, Part of Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.
National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2025 Feb 24;57:101636. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2025.101636. eCollection 2025 Apr.
To identify any differences in the characteristics and outcomes of patients with Isolated cardiac sarcoidosis (iCS) vs systemic cardiac sarcoidosis (sCS).
All inpatient encounters in the Nationwide Readmission Database from 2016 to 2021 were analyzed for the rates, predictors, costs and mortality during index and unplanned 90-days readmissions for iCS and sCS patients. Patients with ischemic heart disease were excluded.
1,667 patients were identified (57.8 % male), of which, 1,013 (60.8 %) had iCS and 654 (39.2 %) had sCS. The median (IQR) age of iCS patients was slightly older [57.0 (49.0-66.0) vs 56.0 (48.0-64.0), p = 0.04]. On index admission, iCS patients had higher prevalence of ventricular tachycardia (36.9 % vs 28.8 %, p = 0.001) and catheter ablation (5.6 % vs 2.8 %, p = 0.006). The predictors for all-cause readmissions were Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) (HR 1.19, 95 % CI 1.01-1.40, p = 0.04), age (HR 0.98 (0.97-1.00), p = 0.01) and the use of anticoagulant therapy (HR 1.92, 95 % CI 1.35-2.72, p < 0.001). Patients with sCS were more likely to be readmitted with heart failure compared to iCS patients (SHR 3.78, 95 % CI 1.11-12.94, p = 0.03). During subsequent readmission, iCS and sCS patients had comparable rates of in-hospital mortality, median length of stay and healthcare-associated costs. No independent predictors of in-hospital mortality at readmission were ascertained.
Isolated CS patients, when compared to systemic CS, had a greater prevalence of ventricular tachycardia and catheter ablation. They were less likely to be re-hospitalized with heart failure within 90-days. Age, higher CCI, and use of anticoagulant therapy were predictors for all-cause readmissions.
确定孤立性心脏结节病(iCS)与系统性心脏结节病(sCS)患者在特征和预后方面的差异。
分析2016年至2021年全国再入院数据库中所有住院病例,以了解iCS和sCS患者在首次入院及计划外90天再入院期间的发生率、预测因素、费用和死亡率。排除缺血性心脏病患者。
共识别出1667例患者(57.8%为男性),其中1013例(60.8%)患有iCS,654例(39.2%)患有sCS。iCS患者的中位(四分位间距)年龄稍大[57.0(49.0 - 66.0)岁 vs 56.0(48.0 - 64.0)岁,p = 0.04]。在首次入院时,iCS患者室性心动过速的患病率更高(36.9% vs 28.8%,p = 0.001),导管消融的比例也更高(5.6% vs 2.8%,p = 0.006)。全因再入院的预测因素为查尔森合并症指数(CCI)(风险比[HR] 1.19,95%置信区间[CI] 1.01 - 1.40,p = 0.04)、年龄(HR 0.98[0.97 - 1.00],p = 0.01)以及抗凝治疗的使用(HR 1.92,95% CI 1.35 - 2.72,p < 0.001)。与iCS患者相比,sCS患者因心力衰竭再次入院的可能性更大(标准化风险比[SHR] 3.78,95% CI 1.11 - 12.9