Suppr超能文献

孕期特定心理创伤评估的系统评价:行动呼吁。

A systematic review on the assessment of pregnancy-specific psychological trauma during pregnancy: A call to action.

作者信息

Givrad Soudabeh, Wall Kathryn M, Goldman Lindsey Wallace, Shin Jin Young, Novak Eloise H, Lowell Amanda, Penner Francesca, Day Michèle J, Papa Lea, Wright Drew, Rutherford Helena J V

机构信息

Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY (Givrad, Goldman, and Wright).

Yale Child Study Center, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT (Wall, Shin, Lowell, Novak, Penner, Day, Papa, and Rutherford).

出版信息

AJOG Glob Rep. 2025 Feb 3;5(1):100451. doi: 10.1016/j.xagr.2025.100451. eCollection 2025 Feb.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Psychological trauma negatively impacts maternal and infant health during the perinatal period. A history of traumatic experiences related to previous pregnancies and births (termed pregnancy-specific psychological trauma or PSPT) increases the risk of a host of psychological disorders. It can impede women's/the pregnant individual's relationship with the healthcare system and their developing child. There are, however, no guidelines or agreed-upon validated screening measures to assess PSPT during the perinatal period. To build a knowledge base to develop future measure(s) of PSPT, we conducted a systematic review to understand how and when PSPT has been measured during pregnancy.

DATA SOURCES

Searches were run in July 2021 on the following databases: Ovid MEDLINE (In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations and Ovid MEDLINE 1946 to Present), Ovid EMBASE (1974 to present), Scopus, Web of Science, PsycInfo, and Cochrane. Updated searches and reference searching/snow-balling were conducted in September 2023.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

The search strategy included all appropriate controlled vocabulary and keywords for psychological trauma and pregnancy.

METHODS

This systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Two independent researchers screened abstracts and, subsequently, full-texts of abstracts for appropriateness, with conflicts resolved via a third independent reviewer. A secondary analysis was performed on studies measuring PSPT during pregnancy.

RESULTS

Of the 576 studies examining psychological trauma in pregnancy, only 15.8% (n=91) had a measure of PSPT. Of these 91 studies, 53 used a measure designed by the research team to assess PSPT. Critically, none of the measurements used screened for PSPT comprehensively.

CONCLUSION

It is time to screen for and study PSPT in all perinatal individuals. Recognition of PSPT should promote trauma-informed care delivery by obstetrics and neonatology/pediatric teams during the perinatal period.

摘要

目的

心理创伤会对围产期母婴健康产生负面影响。既往妊娠和分娩相关的创伤经历史(称为特定妊娠心理创伤或PSPT)会增加一系列心理障碍的风险。它会妨碍女性/孕妇与医疗保健系统以及其发育中的胎儿之间的关系。然而,在围产期评估PSPT尚无指南或公认的有效筛查措施。为建立知识基础以开发未来的PSPT测量方法,我们进行了一项系统综述,以了解在孕期如何以及何时对PSPT进行测量。

数据来源

2021年7月在以下数据库进行检索:Ovid MEDLINE(正在处理及其他未索引引文和1946年至今的Ovid MEDLINE)、Ovid EMBASE(1974年至今)、Scopus、科学引文索引、PsycInfo和考科蓝图书馆。2023年9月进行了更新检索和参考文献检索/滚雪球检索。

研究纳入标准

检索策略包括心理创伤和妊娠的所有适当控制词汇和关键词。

方法

本系统综述按照系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南进行。两名独立研究人员筛选摘要,随后筛选摘要全文的适用性,冲突由第三位独立评审员解决。对孕期测量PSPT的研究进行了二次分析。

结果

在576项研究孕期心理创伤的研究中,只有15.8%(n = 91)对PSPT进行了测量。在这91项研究中,53项使用了研究团队设计的测量方法来评估PSPT。至关重要的是,所使用的测量方法均未全面筛查PSPT。

结论

现在是时候对所有围产期个体进行PSPT筛查和研究了。认识到PSPT应促进产科和新生儿科/儿科团队在围产期提供以创伤为导向的护理。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1e4/11909425/7d8ad68d2e92/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验