Iyer Shivani Madhuchandra, Singh Sanjeet, Srivastav Alok
Department of Urology, Dr RML Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, UP, India.
Int Urogynecol J. 2025 Mar 17. doi: 10.1007/s00192-025-06104-2.
Vesicovaginal fistula (VVF) is a devastating obstetric complication. Transvaginal, transabdominal, laparoscopic and robotic repairs have been proposed. This study was carried out to compare peri-operative and post-operative parameters of supratrigonal VVF repair to find out the best surgical approach among vaginal, abdominal and laparoscopic approaches.
A quasi-experimental study was carried out from January 2015 to January 2021. A total of 175 women suffering from VVF were screened and 150 women with supratrigonal VVF were recruited. VVF repair was performed using transvaginal, transabdominal and laparoscopic approaches (50 repairs using each approach). Parameters such as success rate, operative time, blood loss, post-operative complications and hospital stay were recorded. Statistical analysis was carried out using SPSS Version 21. Written informed consent was taken before the recruitment of subjects.
Lower (uterine) segment Caesarean section, open or laparoscopic hysterectomy and obstructed labour were the common causes. Statistical analysis showed that mean operative time was significantly lower in vaginal repair, whereas analgesic requirement, hospital stay and blood loss were significantly lower in vaginal and laparoscopic repair. Urinary tract infection was seen in all three approaches, and was resolved by administration of antibiotics post-operatively. Minor wound infection was seen only in the transabdominal repair group, which resolved with the regular application of dressings. None of the patients developed recurrence during follow-up.
Transvaginal and laparoscopic repairs are safe and effective approaches for VVF repair. However, laparoscopic repair requires a steep learning curve. Transvaginal repair has a significantly shorter operative time. Hence, in simple supratrigonal VVF, a transvaginal repair can be a preferred option.
膀胱阴道瘘(VVF)是一种严重的产科并发症。已提出经阴道、经腹、腹腔镜及机器人修复术。本研究旨在比较膀胱三角区上方VVF修复术的围手术期和术后参数,以找出阴道、腹部和腹腔镜手术方法中最佳的手术方式。
2015年1月至2021年1月进行了一项准实验研究。共筛查了175例患有VVF的女性,招募了150例膀胱三角区上方VVF的女性。采用经阴道、经腹和腹腔镜手术方法进行VVF修复(每种方法各进行50例修复)。记录成功率、手术时间、失血量、术后并发症和住院时间等参数。使用SPSS 21版进行统计分析。在招募受试者前获得书面知情同意。
下段(子宫)剖宫产、开腹或腹腔镜子宫切除术以及产程梗阻是常见原因。统计分析表明,阴道修复的平均手术时间显著更短,而阴道和腹腔镜修复的镇痛需求、住院时间和失血量显著更低。三种手术方法均出现了尿路感染,术后通过使用抗生素得以解决。仅在经腹修复组出现了轻微伤口感染,通过定期换药得以解决。随访期间所有患者均未出现复发。
经阴道和腹腔镜修复是VVF修复的安全有效方法。然而,腹腔镜修复需要陡峭的学习曲线。经阴道修复的手术时间显著更短。因此,对于单纯的膀胱三角区上方VVF,经阴道修复可能是首选方案。