Zedde Marialuisa, Piazza Fabrizio, Pascarella Rosario
Neurology Unit, Stroke Unit, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Viale Risorgimento 80, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy.
CAA and AD Translational Research and Biomarkers Laboratory, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Via Cadore 48, 20900 Monza, Italy.
J Clin Med. 2025 Mar 3;14(5):1697. doi: 10.3390/jcm14051697.
Cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) is one of the most prevalent small vessel diseases (SVDs). Its neuroradiological hallmarks are both hemorrhagic and non-hemorrhagic ones. Among the clinical manifestations, transient focal neurological episodes (TFNEs) are associated with an increased risk of bleeding in a short time period and with convexal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). The natural history of CAA is incompletely characterized in the literature, because the focus has been mostly on hemorrhagic events, while both clinical and non-hemorrhagic presentations are possible and sometimes underestimated. Furthermore, new diagnostic criteria have incorporated non-hemorrhagic Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) markers and non-hemorrhagic clinical presentations. Disease trajectories are often individual and help provide food for thought and discussion on some issues, thus allowing for a greater and deeper evaluation. We, therefore, present a case that exemplifies how the natural history of CAA can be atypical compared to its expected course, which is long and not only hemorrhagic. Several episodes of CAA-related inflammation, with prevalent, but not exclusive, leptomeningeal involvement, were evaluated and treated in the presented case, in which the intraparenchymal cerebral hemorrhagic manifestation was the last in the patient's history. CAA may have a very long natural history. During the disease's course, inflammatory features might be prominent in neuroimaging but not strongly symptomatic, and intraparenchymal cerebral hemorrhage (ICH) may be a late event. The awareness of this subtype of the disease allows us to better explore the pathophysiology of CAA and to increase the level of clinical suspicion for the diagnosis. Furthermore, the distinction between different disease phenotypes can provide useful information for patient management in clinical practice.
脑淀粉样血管病(CAA)是最常见的小血管疾病(SVD)之一。其神经放射学特征包括出血性和非出血性特征。在临床表现中,短暂性局灶性神经发作(TFNE)与短期内出血风险增加以及脑凸面蛛网膜下腔出血(SAH)相关。CAA的自然病程在文献中尚未完全明确,因为研究重点大多集中在出血事件上,而临床和非出血性表现均有可能且有时被低估。此外,新的诊断标准纳入了非出血性磁共振成像(MRI)标志物和非出血性临床表现。疾病轨迹往往因人而异,有助于引发对一些问题的思考和讨论,从而进行更深入的评估。因此,我们报告一例病例,该病例体现了CAA的自然病程与预期病程相比可能具有非典型性,预期病程较长且不仅有出血表现。在该病例中,评估并治疗了几次与CAA相关的炎症发作,主要累及软脑膜,但并非仅累及软脑膜,该病例中脑实质内脑出血表现是患者病程中的最后阶段。CAA的自然病程可能非常漫长。在疾病过程中,炎症特征在神经影像学上可能较为突出,但症状并不强烈,脑实质内脑出血(ICH)可能是晚期事件。认识到这种疾病亚型有助于我们更好地探索CAA的病理生理学,并提高临床诊断的怀疑程度。此外,区分不同的疾病表型可为临床实践中的患者管理提供有用信息。