• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两种白蜡树属植物对干旱及恢复的比较表型、生理和转录组反应

Comparative phenotypic, physiological, and transcriptomic responses to drought and recovery in two Fraxinus species.

作者信息

Kim Tae-Lim, Lim Hyemin, Lee Kyungmi, Denison Michael Immanuel Jesse, Natarajan Sathishkumar, Oh Changyoung

机构信息

Department of Forest Bioresources, National Institute of Forest Science, Suwon, 16631, Korea.

3BIGS CO. Ltd, Hwaseong, 18469, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

BMC Plant Biol. 2025 Mar 18;25(1):348. doi: 10.1186/s12870-025-06372-6.

DOI:10.1186/s12870-025-06372-6
PMID:40098103
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11916329/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study focused on the drought tolerance and resilience of two ash species: Fraxinus chiisanensis and F. rhynchophylla. These two species are distributed in different habitats, suggesting that they have different levels of drought tolerance. Understanding their response to drought stress, particularly during the seedling stage, is crucial for selecting and developing drought-resistant varieties. This study aimed to compare the phenotypic, physiological, and transcriptomic characteristics of drought-stressed and recovered rewatered plants in a time-course experiment.

RESULTS

In F. rhynchophylla, drought stress resulted in more severe growth retardation, temperature increase, and a faster decline in the fluorescence response, accompanied by a significant rise in stress indices. However, these reactions recovered quickly after rehydration. In contrast, F. chiisanensis exhibited less growth retardation, a slower decline in fluorescence, and milder increases in stress indices, although many individuals did not fully recover after rehydration. The activity of antioxidant enzymes (SOD, CAT, APX) was more responsive and recovered more efficiently in F. rhynchophylla, while F. chiisanensis had a weaker and delayed response. Transcriptome analysis revealed that photosynthesis and enzyme activity were the most responsive to drought and recovery, as shown by Gene Ontology term analysis. Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathway analysis identified common pathways involved in starch and sucrose metabolism and phenylpropanoid biosynthesis in both species. F. rhynchophylla had more differentially expressed genes (DEGs) than F. chiisanensis, particularly on the drought and recovery day 6. Most drought-induced DEGs were restored after rehydration. Commonly associated genes included BGLU and TPS in sugar metabolism; CAT, GSTF, TT7, and HCT in antioxidant enzymes; PYL4 and RR17 in hormone signaling; and ADC1 and ASP3 in proline synthesis.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights the species-specific characteristics of drought and recovery responses of two Fraxinus species and provides targets for assessing and improving drought tolerance. Moreover, the results of this study provide insights into the physiological and genetic responses of Fraxinus and may guide future research on ash tree stress tolerance.

摘要

背景

本研究聚焦于两种白蜡树(千山野白蜡树和水曲柳)的耐旱性和恢复力。这两个物种分布于不同的栖息地,表明它们具有不同程度的耐旱性。了解它们对干旱胁迫的响应,尤其是在幼苗期的响应,对于选择和培育抗旱品种至关重要。本研究旨在通过一项时间进程实验,比较干旱胁迫及复水恢复后的植株的表型、生理和转录组特征。

结果

在水曲柳中,干旱胁迫导致更严重的生长迟缓、温度升高以及荧光响应更快下降,同时胁迫指标显著上升。然而,复水后这些反应迅速恢复。相比之下,千山野白蜡树生长迟缓较轻,荧光下降较慢,胁迫指标上升较温和,尽管许多个体在复水后未完全恢复。抗氧化酶(超氧化物歧化酶、过氧化氢酶、抗坏血酸过氧化物酶)的活性在水曲柳中响应更迅速且恢复更有效,而千山野白蜡树的响应较弱且延迟。转录组分析表明,如基因本体论术语分析所示,光合作用和酶活性对干旱及恢复最为敏感。京都基因与基因组百科全书通路分析确定了两个物种中参与淀粉和蔗糖代谢以及苯丙烷生物合成的共同通路。水曲柳比千山野白蜡树有更多的差异表达基因,特别是在干旱和恢复的第6天。大多数干旱诱导的差异表达基因在复水后恢复。常见的相关基因包括糖代谢中的β-葡萄糖苷酶和海藻糖磷酸合酶;抗氧化酶中的过氧化氢酶、谷胱甘肽转移酶F、TT7和羟基肉桂酰转移酶;激素信号传导中的PYL4和RR17;以及脯氨酸合成中的精氨酸脱羧酶1和天冬氨酸酶3。

结论

本研究突出了两种白蜡树物种在干旱和恢复响应方面的物种特异性特征,并为评估和提高耐旱性提供了靶点。此外,本研究结果为白蜡树的生理和遗传响应提供了见解,并可能指导未来关于白蜡树胁迫耐受性的研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ea6/11916329/75ae246167fa/12870_2025_6372_Fig14_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ea6/11916329/b7f929d67078/12870_2025_6372_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ea6/11916329/d3a980eac72a/12870_2025_6372_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ea6/11916329/6e53eee96305/12870_2025_6372_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ea6/11916329/79be10da92a2/12870_2025_6372_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ea6/11916329/fb9022e93e4b/12870_2025_6372_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ea6/11916329/f771b6477dc3/12870_2025_6372_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ea6/11916329/62dedfa40f3d/12870_2025_6372_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ea6/11916329/4b04deda9624/12870_2025_6372_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ea6/11916329/0bdcabf44801/12870_2025_6372_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ea6/11916329/0b34d1b27812/12870_2025_6372_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ea6/11916329/115386ee3697/12870_2025_6372_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ea6/11916329/3c012cd694e0/12870_2025_6372_Fig12_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ea6/11916329/4614a4d33d83/12870_2025_6372_Fig13_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ea6/11916329/75ae246167fa/12870_2025_6372_Fig14_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ea6/11916329/b7f929d67078/12870_2025_6372_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ea6/11916329/d3a980eac72a/12870_2025_6372_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ea6/11916329/6e53eee96305/12870_2025_6372_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ea6/11916329/79be10da92a2/12870_2025_6372_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ea6/11916329/fb9022e93e4b/12870_2025_6372_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ea6/11916329/f771b6477dc3/12870_2025_6372_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ea6/11916329/62dedfa40f3d/12870_2025_6372_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ea6/11916329/4b04deda9624/12870_2025_6372_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ea6/11916329/0bdcabf44801/12870_2025_6372_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ea6/11916329/0b34d1b27812/12870_2025_6372_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ea6/11916329/115386ee3697/12870_2025_6372_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ea6/11916329/3c012cd694e0/12870_2025_6372_Fig12_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ea6/11916329/4614a4d33d83/12870_2025_6372_Fig13_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ea6/11916329/75ae246167fa/12870_2025_6372_Fig14_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparative phenotypic, physiological, and transcriptomic responses to drought and recovery in two Fraxinus species.两种白蜡树属植物对干旱及恢复的比较表型、生理和转录组反应
BMC Plant Biol. 2025 Mar 18;25(1):348. doi: 10.1186/s12870-025-06372-6.
2
Identification of key genes and signaling pathways in coconut (Cocos nucifera L.) under drought stress via comparative transcriptome analysis.通过比较转录组分析鉴定干旱胁迫下椰子(Cocos nucifera L.)中的关键基因和信号通路。
BMC Plant Biol. 2025 Apr 22;25(1):510. doi: 10.1186/s12870-025-06554-2.
3
Comparative transcriptome analysis of Saposhnikovia divaricata to reveal drought and rehydration adaption strategies.防风的比较转录组分析以揭示干旱和复水适应策略。
Mol Biol Rep. 2023 Apr;50(4):3493-3502. doi: 10.1007/s11033-023-08305-8. Epub 2023 Feb 13.
4
Comparative transcriptomic analysis of contrasting hybrid cultivars reveal key drought-responsive genes and metabolic pathways regulating drought stress tolerance in maize at various stages.对比分析不同杂交品种的转录组学研究揭示了调控玉米在不同阶段对干旱胁迫耐受性的关键抗旱响应基因和代谢途径。
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 15;15(10):e0240468. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240468. eCollection 2020.
5
Iris lactea var. chinensis plant drought tolerance depends on the response of proline metabolism, transcription factors, transporters and the ROS-scavenging system.中华乳黄鸢尾植株的耐旱性取决于脯氨酸代谢、转录因子、转运蛋白和 ROS 清除系统的响应。
BMC Plant Biol. 2023 Jan 9;23(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s12870-022-04019-4.
6
Genome-Wide Gene Expression Profiles Analysis Reveal Novel Insights into Drought Stress in Foxtail Millet ( L.).全基因组基因表达谱分析揭示了谷子(Setaria italica)干旱胁迫的新见解。
Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Nov 12;21(22):8520. doi: 10.3390/ijms21228520.
7
Comprehensive Analysis of Rice Seedling Transcriptome during Dehydration and Rehydration.水稻幼苗脱水和复水过程中的转录组综合分析
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 May 8;24(9):8439. doi: 10.3390/ijms24098439.
8
Integrative physiological and transcriptomic analysis provides insights on the molecular basis of ABA-enhanced drought tolerance in pear (Pyrus betulaefolia).综合生理和转录组分析为梨(杜梨)中脱落酸增强的耐旱性的分子基础提供了见解。
BMC Plant Biol. 2025 Apr 21;25(1):496. doi: 10.1186/s12870-025-06543-5.
9
Transcriptome profiling reveals the effects of drought tolerance in Giant Juncao.转录组谱分析揭示了巨型蒲公英耐旱性的影响。
BMC Plant Biol. 2021 Jan 4;21(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s12870-020-02785-7.
10
Transcriptome analysis reveals regulatory mechanisms of different drought-tolerant Gleditsia sinensis seedlings under drought stress.转录组分析揭示了不同耐旱性皂荚幼苗在干旱胁迫下的调控机制。
BMC Genom Data. 2024 Mar 13;25(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12863-024-01216-y.

引用本文的文献

1
Drought tolerance evaluation of Fraxinus mandshurica in a semi-arid area.半干旱地区水曲柳耐旱性评价
BMC Plant Biol. 2025 Aug 29;25(1):1157. doi: 10.1186/s12870-025-07146-w.
2
Integrated analysis of 16 S endophytic bacteria and non-targeted metabolomics reveals the drought response mechanisms of Portulaca Oleracea L.16S内生细菌与非靶向代谢组学的综合分析揭示了马齿苋的干旱响应机制
BMC Plant Biol. 2025 Aug 27;25(1):1139. doi: 10.1186/s12870-025-07181-7.

本文引用的文献

1
Genome-wide analysis of the TIFY family and function of and under cold stress in pepper ( L.).辣椒(L.)中TIFY家族的全基因组分析以及低温胁迫下 和 的功能
Front Plant Sci. 2023 Nov 22;14:1308721. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1308721. eCollection 2023.
2
Antioxidants of Non-Enzymatic Nature: Their Function in Higher Plant Cells and the Ways of Boosting Their Biosynthesis.非酶性质的抗氧化剂:它们在高等植物细胞中的功能以及促进其生物合成的方法
Antioxidants (Basel). 2023 Nov 17;12(11):2014. doi: 10.3390/antiox12112014.
3
A Cinnamate 4-HYDROXYLASE1 from Safflower Promotes Flavonoids Accumulation and Stimulates Antioxidant Defense System in Arabidopsis.
红花 4-香豆酸羟化酶 1 促进类黄酮积累并刺激拟南芥的抗氧化防御系统。
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Mar 11;24(6):5393. doi: 10.3390/ijms24065393.
4
Starch and Sucrose Metabolism and Plant Hormone Signaling Pathways Play Crucial Roles in Salt Stress Adaption.淀粉和蔗糖代谢与植物激素信号通路在盐胁迫适应中发挥着关键作用。
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Feb 16;24(4):3948. doi: 10.3390/ijms24043948.
5
Transcriptome and anatomical studies reveal alterations in leaf thickness under long-term drought stress in tobacco.转录组和解剖学研究揭示了长期干旱胁迫下烟草叶片厚度的变化。
J Plant Physiol. 2023 Feb;281:153920. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2023.153920. Epub 2023 Jan 13.
6
Arabidopsis immune responses triggered by cellulose- and mixed-linked glucan-derived oligosaccharides require a group of leucine-rich repeat malectin receptor kinases.拟南芥对纤维素和混合连接的葡聚糖衍生寡糖引发的免疫反应需要一组富含亮氨酸重复的甘露糖受体激酶。
Plant J. 2023 Feb;113(4):833-850. doi: 10.1111/tpj.16088. Epub 2023 Jan 31.
7
Plant Glutathione Peroxidases: Non-Heme Peroxidases with Large Functional Flexibility as a Core Component of ROS-Processing Mechanisms and Signalling.植物谷胱甘肽过氧化物酶:具有高度功能灵活性的非血红素过氧化物酶,作为活性氧处理机制和信号传导的核心组成部分
Antioxidants (Basel). 2022 Aug 21;11(8):1624. doi: 10.3390/antiox11081624.
8
PYR/PYL/RCAR Receptors Play a Vital Role in the Abscisic-Acid-Dependent Responses of Plants to External or Internal Stimuli.PYR/PYL/RCAR 受体在植物对外界或内部刺激的脱落酸依赖反应中起着至关重要的作用。
Cells. 2022 Apr 15;11(8):1352. doi: 10.3390/cells11081352.
9
Comparative Transcriptome Analysis Unravels Defense Pathways of Torr Against Salt Stress.比较转录组分析揭示了托尔对盐胁迫的防御途径。
Front Plant Sci. 2022 Mar 4;13:842726. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.842726. eCollection 2022.
10
Effective Use of Water in Crop Plants in Dryland Agriculture: Implications of Reactive Oxygen Species and Antioxidative System.旱地农业中作物对水分的有效利用:活性氧和抗氧化系统的影响
Front Plant Sci. 2022 Jan 10;12:778270. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.778270. eCollection 2021.