Celik Tarik, Menek Burak
Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Institute of Health Sciences, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey.
J Hand Ther. 2025 Mar 17. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2024.12.018.
Rotator cuff disease treatment typically involves manual therapy and exercise as part of physical therapy.
This study aims to investigate the effects of Mulligan and Maitland mobilization methods on pain, functionality, quality of life, and proprioception in individuals with rotator cuff lesions. STUDY DESIGN: This was a single-blinded randomized clinical trial.
The study included 45 individuals with rotator cuff lesions. Participants were randomly divided into three groups: conventional exercise, Maitland mobilization, and Mulligan mobilization. All participants were assessed pretreatment and post treatment using the Visual Analog Scale, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand, Rotator Cuff Quality of Life, range of motion (ROM), and proprioception.
All parameters, except proprioception, improved significantly in all three groups post treatment (p < 0.05). Mulligan group (MG) and Maitland mobilization group (MMG) had higher improvements to the conventional exercise group (CG) in terms of flexion ROM (p = 0.05, effect size = 0.22), abduction ROM (p = 0.02, effect size = 0.26), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (p < 0.001, effect size = 0.56). Also, the MG group had greater improvements to the MMG and CG groups in terms of Rotator Cuff Quality of Life/symptoms (p < 0.001, effect size = 0.43), job (p < 0.001, effect size = 0.61), lifestyle (p < 0.001, effect size = 0.42), emotional parameters (p < 0.001, effect size = 0.29). MG was more effective than the MMG in Visual Analog Scale activity (p < 0.001, effect size = 0.32), external rotation (p = 0.012, effect size = 0.19), and abduction ROM (p = 0.002, effect size = 0.26). However, no improvement in proprioception was observed across all groups (p > 0.05).
This study concluded that, in addition to conventional treatment, both Mulligan and Maitland mobilization therapy effectively improve range of motion, functionality, and quality of life.
肩袖疾病的治疗通常包括手法治疗和运动,作为物理治疗的一部分。
本研究旨在探讨 Mulligan 和 Maitland 松动术对肩袖损伤患者疼痛、功能、生活质量和本体感觉的影响。
这是一项单盲随机临床试验。
该研究纳入了 45 例肩袖损伤患者。参与者被随机分为三组:传统运动组、Maitland 松动术组和 Mulligan 松动术组。所有参与者在治疗前和治疗后均使用视觉模拟量表、手臂、肩部和手部功能障碍量表、肩袖生活质量量表、活动范围(ROM)和本体感觉进行评估。
治疗后,除本体感觉外,所有三组的所有参数均有显著改善(p < 0.05)。在屈曲 ROM(p = 0.05,效应量 = 0.22)、外展 ROM(p = 0.02,效应量 = 0.26)、手臂、肩部和手部功能障碍(p < 0.001,效应量 = 0.56)方面,Mulligan 组(MG)和 Maitland 松动术组(MMG)比传统运动组(CG)有更大改善。此外,在肩袖生活质量/症状(p < 0.001,效应量 = 0.43)、工作(p < 0.001,效应量 = 0.61)、生活方式(p < 0.001,效应量 = 0.42)、情绪参数(p < 0.001,效应量 = 0.29)方面,MG 组比 MMG 组和 CG 组有更大改善。在视觉模拟量表活动(p < 0.001,效应量 = 0.32)、外旋(p = 0.012,效应量 = 0.19)和外展 ROM(p = 0.002,效应量 = 0.26)方面,MG 比 MMG 更有效。然而,所有组的本体感觉均未改善(p > 0.05)。
本研究得出结论,除传统治疗外,Mulligan 和 Maitland 松动术均能有效改善活动范围、功能和生活质量。