Westlund Gotby Lovisa E L, Stella Martina, Van Speybroeck Camille D E, Lobeek Daphne, van Velden Floris H P, Stam Mette K, Dibbets-Schneider Petra, de Vries-Huizing Daphne M V, Rijkhorst Erik-Jan, de Wit-van de Veen Berlinda J, Wierts Roel, van Rooij Rob
Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
EJNMMI Phys. 2025 Mar 19;12(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s40658-025-00733-8.
BACKGROUND: Reliable dosimetry based on SPECT/CT imaging is essential to achieve personalized Ho-radioembolization treatment planning and evaluation. This study quantitatively evaluates multiple acquisition and reconstruction protocols for Ho-SPECT imaging based on data from five Dutch hospitals. We aim to recommend an imaging protocol which harmonizes Ho-SPECT images for reproducible and accurate dosimetry in a multi-scanner and multi-center setting. METHODS: Cylindrical and NEMA IEC phantoms, filled with Ho-chloride, were imaged using seven SPECT/CT scanners from two vendors (GE HealthCare and Siemens Healthineers). Data were acquired with a photopeak window centered at 81 keV. Two adjacent scatter windows, and one upper scatter window at 118 keV were used for triple-energy window (TEW) and dual-energy window (DEW) scatter correction, respectively. The TEW and DEW reconstructions used vendor-specific software. Additionally, a vendor-neutral software package with Monte Carlo (MC) scatter correction (Hermes Medical Solutions) was used to study the influence of scanner hardware on the image quality. System sensitivity was measured in projection data of the cylindrical phantom. The axial uniformity in the cylindrical phantom was used to characterize the impact of the scatter correction method. The image quality was evaluated by the coefficient of variation (COV; noise), the contrast recovery coefficients (CRCs) and contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs). RESULTS: TEW scatter correction resulted in superior uniformity and higher CRCs compared to the DEW (CRC for the largest sphere over all scanners, mean ± SD (range): TEW 0.54 ± 0.07 (0.36-0.65), DEW 0.44 ± 0.04 (0.34-0.51)). DEW resulted in lower noise levels compared to TEW (16% lower on average). The DEW and TEW images resulted in comparable CNRs. The system sensitivities and the vendor-neutral image reconstructions demonstrated differences in hardware between the two vendors, most likely due to the characteristics of the vendor-specific medium energy collimator. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that TEW scatter correction increases the accuracy of Ho-SPECT images compared to DEW, and we henceforth recommend adopting this method in the clinical Ho-dosimetry workflow. Scanner hardware has a substantial impact on the characteristics of the acquired data, and identical reconstruction settings will therefore not automatically lead to harmonized image quality.
背景:基于SPECT/CT成像的可靠剂量测定对于实现个性化钬放射性栓塞治疗计划和评估至关重要。本研究基于来自五家荷兰医院的数据,对钬SPECT成像的多种采集和重建协议进行了定量评估。我们旨在推荐一种成像协议,该协议能使钬SPECT图像协调一致,以便在多扫描仪和多中心环境中进行可重复且准确的剂量测定。 方法:使用来自两家供应商(通用电气医疗集团和西门子医疗系统公司)的七台SPECT/CT扫描仪,对填充有氯化钬的圆柱形和NEMA IEC体模进行成像。数据采集的光电峰窗口以81 keV为中心。两个相邻的散射窗口以及一个位于118 keV的上部散射窗口分别用于三能量窗口(TEW)和双能量窗口(DEW)散射校正。TEW和DEW重建使用供应商特定的软件。此外,使用带有蒙特卡罗(MC)散射校正的通用软件包(赫耳墨斯医疗解决方案公司)来研究扫描仪硬件对图像质量的影响。在圆柱形体模的投影数据中测量系统灵敏度。圆柱形体模中的轴向均匀性用于表征散射校正方法的影响。通过变异系数(COV;噪声)、对比度恢复系数(CRC)和对比度噪声比(CNR)来评估图像质量。 结果:与DEW相比,TEW散射校正产生了更好的均匀性和更高的CRC(所有扫描仪上最大球体的CRC,平均值±标准差(范围):TEW为0.54±0.07(0.36 - 0.65),DEW为0.44±0.04(0.34 - 0.51))。与TEW相比,DEW产生的噪声水平更低(平均低16%)。DEW和TEW图像产生的CNR相当。系统灵敏度和通用图像重建显示了两家供应商之间硬件的差异,这很可能是由于供应商特定的中能准直器的特性所致。 结论:本研究表明,与DEW相比,TEW散射校正提高了钬SPECT图像的准确性,因此我们建议在临床钬剂量测定工作流程中采用这种方法。扫描仪硬件对采集数据的特性有重大影响,因此相同的重建设置不会自动导致图像质量的协调一致。
Phys Med Biol. 2006-10-7
Phys Med Biol. 2016-7-21
Med Phys. 2013-8
EJNMMI Rep. 2025-7-8
EJNMMI Phys. 2024-9-26
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2023-3
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2020-7