Holm-Jensen Aske, Vlachos Evgenios, Storm Louise Kamuk, Myburgh Corrie
Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, Odense M, Denmark.
University of Southern Denmark, University Library of Southern Denmark, Odense M, Denmark.
Sports Med Open. 2025 Mar 18;11(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s40798-025-00823-y.
Formal statements articulating the meaning of primary, secondary and tertiary prevention concepts are commonly used in the musculoskeletal sports injuries literature, but appear to be employed inconsistently and incorrectly. Standard definitions, appropriate to athletic health and performance practice, are required to systematically develop the state-of-the-art. To accomplish this, we summarized prevention definitions with the aim of improving conceptual clarity across the musculoskeletal sports injuries literature.
We used a rapid literature review method, searching Scopus, PubMed/Medline, Cochrane Library reviews/trials, Web of Science, Sports Medicine and Education Index, SPORTDiscus and CINAHL databases for titles/abstracts for available literature, published in English from database-inception to November 2023. Our search terms were: sport/athlete, injury, primary prevention, secondary prevention, and/or tertiary prevention. Definitions were extracted to create categories illustrating overlap and variation. We extracted definitions from 144 included studies (n). Primary prevention appears focused on mitigating injury risk (n = 52) and preventing initial injuries (n = 42). Secondary prevention appears to address five distinct concepts: preventing recurrences (n = 42), preventing sequelae (n = 41), preventing index injury worsening (n = 27), mitigating injury risk (n = 15), and restoring function (n = 12). Tertiary prevention appears focused on preventing sequelae (n = 17) and restoring function (n = 9).
From a definition viewpoint, the aim of primary prevention is narrowly conceptualized and consistent in the musculoskeletal sports injury research literature. However, secondary prevention definitions vary substantially, with at least three distinct conceptual aims observable. Tertiary prevention definitions appear infrequently in the literature and when observed tend to overlap with secondary prevention. Currently, researchers are likely to struggle with the formulation of clearly-defined and transferrable research questions relating to the aims of secondary prevention.
阐明一级、二级和三级预防概念含义的正式声明在肌肉骨骼运动损伤文献中普遍使用,但使用方式似乎不一致且不正确。需要适用于运动健康和表现实践的标准定义,以系统地发展最新技术。为实现这一目标,我们总结了预防定义,旨在提高肌肉骨骼运动损伤文献中的概念清晰度。
我们采用快速文献综述方法,在Scopus、PubMed/Medline、Cochrane图书馆综述/试验、科学网、运动医学与教育索引、SPORTDiscus和CINAHL数据库中搜索从数据库建立到2023年11月以英文发表的可用文献的标题/摘要。我们的搜索词为:运动/运动员、损伤、一级预防、二级预防和/或三级预防。提取定义以创建说明重叠和差异的类别。我们从144项纳入研究中提取了定义。一级预防似乎侧重于降低损伤风险(n = 52)和预防初次损伤(n = 42)。二级预防似乎涉及五个不同概念:预防复发(n = 42)、预防后遗症(n = 41)、预防索引损伤恶化(n = 27)、降低损伤风险(n = 15)和恢复功能(n = 12)。三级预防似乎侧重于预防后遗症(n = 17)和恢复功能(n = 9)。
从定义角度来看,一级预防的目标在肌肉骨骼运动损伤研究文献中的概念界定狭窄且一致。然而,二级预防定义差异很大,可观察到至少三个不同的概念目标。三级预防定义在文献中很少出现,且出现时往往与二级预防重叠。目前,研究人员在制定与二级预防目标相关的明确且可转移的研究问题时可能会遇到困难。