Böbel Simone, Verhoeven Jeske, Scholz Mirjam, Penders Bart, Frisina Doetter Lorraine, Collatz Christensen Helle, Krafft Thomas
Department of Health, Ethics and Society, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Fraunhofer Institute for Manufacturing Engineering and Automation IPA, Stuttgart, Germany.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Mar 18;25(1):401. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12465-7.
The World Health Organization Emergency Care Systems Framework (WHO ECSF) was designed to offer guidance in establishing and developing effective Emergency Medical Services (EMS) systems. However, evolving disease patterns, changing community needs, and a rising demand for emergency care services, highlight the need for more integrated and patient-centered EMS systems. This evolution should be mirrored in the WHO ECSF. Hence, this study explores system components of the Copenhagen (CPH) EMS that may enhance the WHO ECSF´s emphasis on integrated and patient-centered care.
A qualitative case study was conducted from April through June 2021, including (i) semi-structured interviews with researchers and professionals at the CPH EMS and (ii) a scoping literature review using PubMed, Google Scholar, expert recommendations and snowballing.
Thirteen expert interviews and 35 records were analyzed, revealing key integrated care components within the CPH EMS. These include education and citizen participation programs, early triaging, differentiated care pathways coordinated with primary care and out-of-hours services, and specialized mobile care units complementing "traditional" ambulance services. Technology supports integrated and patient-centered care by facilitating early differentiation of care, efficient dispatching, and communication. Data-driven approaches were fostered through technology-aided data collection, supporting research, quality improvement, and patient safety. The identified components were mapped within the WHO ECSF´s four domains: scene, transport, facility, and cross-cutting elements. Due to the prehospital focus of the CPH EMS, limited data was available for the "facility" site.
The CPH EMS demonstrates an integrated, patient-centered systems approach that emphasizes seamless coordination along the patient care pathway, bridging EMS with broader health and social systems. Research-informed initiatives and intelligent technology solutions underscore the potential for enhancing the WHO ECSF. These findings highlight the importance of continued system integration and a holistic health perspective, including in emergency settings. Further research is needed to assess the transferability of these components across diverse global contexts.
Not applicable.
世界卫生组织紧急护理系统框架(WHO ECSF)旨在为建立和发展有效的紧急医疗服务(EMS)系统提供指导。然而,不断演变的疾病模式、不断变化的社区需求以及对紧急护理服务的需求不断增加,凸显了建立更综合、以患者为中心的EMS系统的必要性。这种演变应反映在WHO ECSF中。因此,本研究探讨了哥本哈根(CPH)EMS的系统组成部分,这些组成部分可能会加强WHO ECSF对综合和以患者为中心的护理的重视。
2021年4月至6月进行了一项定性案例研究,包括(i)对CPH EMS的研究人员和专业人员进行半结构化访谈,以及(ii)使用PubMed、谷歌学术、专家推荐和滚雪球法进行范围界定文献综述。
分析了13次专家访谈和35份记录,揭示了CPH EMS内关键的综合护理组成部分。这些包括教育和公民参与计划、早期分诊、与初级护理和非工作时间服务相协调的差异化护理途径,以及补充“传统”救护车服务的专门移动护理单元。技术通过促进护理的早期区分、高效调度和通信来支持综合和以患者为中心的护理。通过技术辅助数据收集促进了数据驱动方法,支持研究、质量改进和患者安全。确定的组成部分被映射到WHO ECSF的四个领域:现场、运输、设施和交叉要素。由于CPH EMS侧重于院前护理,“设施”站点的可用数据有限。
CPH EMS展示了一种综合的、以患者为中心的系统方法,强调在患者护理路径上的无缝协调,将EMS与更广泛的健康和社会系统联系起来。基于研究的举措和智能技术解决方案凸显了加强WHO ECSF的潜力。这些发现强调了持续系统整合和整体健康观的重要性,包括在紧急情况下。需要进一步研究以评估这些组成部分在不同全球背景下的可转移性。
不适用。