Suppr超能文献

基于模糊层次分析法的风险优先数方法在磁共振成像引导的妇科癌症高剂量率近距离放射治疗失效模式与效应分析中的应用

Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process-based Risk Priority Number Approach in Failure Modes and Effects Analysis for Magnetic Resonance Imaging-guided High-dose-rate Brachytherapy for Gynecologic Cancer.

作者信息

Chang Jina, Kim Hayeon, Lalonde Ron, Doraisamy Elangovan, Vargo John

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Shadyside Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Magee-Women's Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

出版信息

Adv Radiat Oncol. 2025 Feb 3;10(4):101731. doi: 10.1016/j.adro.2025.101731. eCollection 2025 Apr.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA) is commonly used to identify, prioritize, and mitigate potential failure modes (FMs) by assigning a risk priority number (RPN). However, traditional RPN-based FMEA has limitations, particularly when handling the degree of interdependency within processes. To address this, we propose a fuzzy analytical hierarchy process (AHP)-based RPN method, designed to prioritize FMs by accurately weighing risk factors in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided high-dose-rate brachytherapy (BT) for gynecologic (GYN) cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A process map covering all steps was developed for MRI-based GYN BT, and potential FMs were identified. Evaluators were given 2 questionnaires, one for conventional FMEA and another for AHP evaluation. For the AHP method, substeps were grouped by job specialty, with identical weights applied to FMs within each specialty group. Fuzzy linguistic terms helped evaluators handle uncertainties, and final fuzzy AHP-based RPN values were calculated by applying weighted risk factor scores.

RESULTS

The process map included 6 primary steps, 33 substeps, and 82 FMs. In the fuzzy AHP RPN analysis, the top 5 FMs were identified as incorrect/suboptimal applicator insertion, incorrect applicator reconstruction, dose-volume histogram not meeting the physician's intent, incorrect/missing contours, and applicator/patient movement. By comparison, the conventional FMEA ranked the top 5 as incorrect/missing contours, incorrect/suboptimal applicator insertion, dose-volume histogram not meeting the physician's intent, applicator/patient movement, and incorrect applicator reconstruction. FMs with rank differences of 10 or more between methods were mostly related to applicator insertion and MRI.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates the feasibility and effectiveness of a fuzzy AHP-based RPN method for comprehensive FM prioritization, tailored to the clinical workflow of MRI-based GYN BT. Our findings provide a valuable reference for implementing fuzzy AHP-based risk assessment in MRI-guided BT.

摘要

目的

失效模式与效应分析(FMEA)通常用于通过分配风险优先数(RPN)来识别、排序和减轻潜在失效模式(FM)。然而,传统的基于RPN的FMEA存在局限性,特别是在处理流程中的相互依赖程度时。为了解决这一问题,我们提出了一种基于模糊层次分析法(AHP)的RPN方法,旨在通过准确权衡磁共振成像(MRI)引导下的高剂量率近距离放射治疗(BT)用于妇科(GYN)癌症时的风险因素,对FM进行排序。

方法和材料

为基于MRI的GYN BT制定了涵盖所有步骤的流程图,并识别了潜在的FM。评估人员收到两份问卷,一份用于传统FMEA,另一份用于AHP评估。对于AHP方法,子步骤按工作专业分组,每个专业组内的FM应用相同的权重。模糊语言术语帮助评估人员处理不确定性,并通过应用加权风险因素得分计算最终基于模糊AHP的RPN值。

结果

流程图包括6个主要步骤、33个子步骤和82个FM。在模糊AHP RPN分析中,排名前5的FM被确定为施源器插入不正确/次优、施源器重建不正确、剂量体积直方图不符合医生意图、轮廓不正确/缺失以及施源器/患者移动。相比之下,传统FMEA将排名前5的FM列为轮廓不正确/缺失、施源器插入不正确/次优、剂量体积直方图不符合医生意图、施源器/患者移动以及施源器重建不正确。两种方法之间排名差异在10或以上的FM大多与施源器插入和MRI有关。

结论

本研究证明了基于模糊AHP的RPN方法用于全面FM排序的可行性和有效性,该方法针对基于MRI的GYN BT的临床工作流程进行了定制。我们的研究结果为在MRI引导的BT中实施基于模糊AHP的风险评估提供了有价值的参考。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c4f/11914780/52bb922f3739/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验