Kyle Michael, Burns Dustin, Murray Catherine Rogers, Watson Heather, Swaney Jeff, Spevack Samuel, Leonhard Megan, Simon Michael, Moynihan Emma, Lapane Kate L, Wang Shirley V, Longo Craig L, Ritchey Mary E, Dore David D
Currax Pharmaceuticals, LLC, Brentwood, TN, USA.
Exponent, Inc., Irvine, CA, USA.
Obes Pillars. 2025 Feb 17;13:100169. doi: 10.1016/j.obpill.2025.100169. eCollection 2025 Mar.
The fixed-dose extended-release combination of naltrexone/bupropion (NB-ER) is indicated to treat overweight and obesity in adults as an adjunct to a reduced-calorie diet and increased physical activity. This study compared the rate of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and its components (nonfatal acute myocardial infarction [AMI], nonfatal stroke, and cardiovascular death) between patients initiating NB-ER and those initiating lorcaserin (removed from US market in 2020; included as active comparator to minimize possible confounding by indication) in routine clinical practice.
This was a retrospective cohort study with a new-user, active-comparator design. Patients initiating NB-ER or lorcaserin were identified using Arcadia Data Research electronic health records, including insurance claims (June 2012-February 2020). Incidence rate ratios were estimated, and adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using a propensity score (PS)-weighted Cox proportional hazard model in an intention-to-treat analysis.
Patients initiating NB-ER (n = 12 475) or lorcaserin (n = 12 171) were followed for a mean observation period of 4.7 years. After PS weighting, baseline comorbidities, concomitant medications, lifestyle factors, and clinical measures were balanced between cohorts. MACE incidence was 0.77/1000 person-years for NB-ER and 1.03/1000 person-years for lorcaserin. Compared to lorcaserin, patients initiating NB-ER had statistically similar rates of MACE (aHR, 0.76; 95 % CI, 0.48-1.22), nonfatal AMI (aHR, 0.74; 95 % CI, 0.45-1.23), and nonfatal stroke (aHR, 1.05; 95 % CI, 0.34-3.22). No deaths were observed within 30 days of an AMI or stroke.
Patients initiating NB-ER compared with lorcaserin were not at an increased risk of MACE or its components. Conclusions from this study must be interpreted in the context of certain assumptions related to PS methodology and use of lorcaserin as an active comparator. Causal interpretations for the cardiovascular safety of NB-ER should be evaluated further in a prospective, randomized, blinded, controlled clinical trial.
纳曲酮/安非他酮固定剂量缓释复方制剂(NB-ER)被批准用于治疗成人超重和肥胖,作为低热量饮食和增加体力活动的辅助手段。本研究比较了在常规临床实践中,开始使用NB-ER的患者与开始使用洛卡塞林(2020年从美国市场撤市;作为活性对照纳入以尽量减少指征可能造成的混杂)的患者之间的主要不良心血管事件(MACE)发生率及其组成部分(非致命性急性心肌梗死[AMI]、非致命性卒中及心血管死亡)。
这是一项采用新用户、活性对照设计的回顾性队列研究。使用阿卡迪亚数据研究电子健康记录(包括保险理赔记录,时间为2012年6月至2020年2月)识别开始使用NB-ER或洛卡塞林的患者。在意向性分析中,采用倾向评分(PS)加权Cox比例风险模型估计发病率比,并估计95%置信区间(CI)的调整风险比(aHR)。
开始使用NB-ER(n = 12475)或洛卡塞林(n = 12171)的患者平均观察期为4.7年。PS加权后,各队列间基线合并症、伴随用药、生活方式因素及临床指标达到平衡。NB-ER的MACE发生率为0.77/1000人年,洛卡塞林为1.03/1000人年。与洛卡塞林相比,开始使用NB-ER的患者MACE发生率(aHR,0.76;95%CI,0.48 - 1.22)、非致命性AMI发生率(aHR,0.74;95%CI,0.45 - 1.23)及非致命性卒中发生率(aHR,1.05;95%CI,0.34 - 3.22)在统计学上相似。在AMI或卒中发生后30天内未观察到死亡病例。
与洛卡塞林相比,开始使用NB-ER的患者发生MACE或其组成部分的风险未增加。本研究的结论必须在与PS方法及使用洛卡塞林作为活性对照相关的某些假设背景下进行解读。NB-ER心血管安全性的因果解释应在前瞻性、随机、双盲、对照临床试验中进一步评估。