Taillandier Apolline, Stephens Neil, Vanderslott Samantha
Apolline Taillandier (corresponding author), Leverhulme Centre for the Future of Intelligence, Department of Politics and International Studies, Newnham College, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom. E-mail:
Neil Stephens, School of Social Policy and Society, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom. E-mail:
Econ Soc. 2025 Feb 7;54(1):1-25. doi: 10.1080/03085147.2024.2439715. eCollection 2025.
A recent philanthropic movement with advocates among high-profile tech entrepreneurs and philosophers, effective altruism (EA) has been widely disparaged for its flawed moral philosophy and conservative political implications. As philanthropic practice, however, it has been seldom studied. In this paper, we argue that claims to technoscientific expertise are central to how EA actors understand, legitimize, and take part in the production of philanthropic value. We analyze their practices of categorization, ranking and measurement as well as underlying technoscientific imaginaries and moral views through comparing three areas of EA intervention: neglected tropical diseases, cultured meat, and AI safety. We show how EA involves various and contested ambitions to direct knowledge production and redraw the boundaries of expert communities, shedding light on the centrality of technoscience in philanthropists' worldmaking ambitions.
最近,有效利他主义(EA)在知名科技企业家和哲学家中得到了倡导者的支持,成为一场慈善运动。然而,由于其存在缺陷的道德哲学和保守的政治影响,它受到了广泛的诋毁。作为一种慈善实践,它却很少受到研究。在本文中,我们认为,对技术科学专业知识的主张是有效利他主义行动者理解、合法化并参与慈善价值创造的核心。通过比较有效利他主义干预的三个领域:被忽视的热带病、 cultured meat(此处原文有误,推测可能是“人造肉”cultured meat )和人工智能安全,我们分析了他们的分类、排名和衡量实践,以及潜在的技术科学想象和道德观点。我们展示了有效利他主义如何涉及各种有争议的目标,以引导知识生产并重新划定专家群体的界限,揭示了技术科学在慈善家构建世界的目标中的核心地位。