Takasu Shojiro, Matsumoto Sari, Sakamoto Kana
Department of Forensic Medicine, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, JPN.
Cureus. 2025 Feb 16;17(2):e79089. doi: 10.7759/cureus.79089. eCollection 2025 Feb.
The accuracy of total bilirubin (T-Bil) measurement in postmortem specimens is unclear because most forensic autopsy cases lack recent antemortem biochemical data to serve as references.
This study compared T-Bil concentrations between antemortem serum values, postmortem serum, and pericardial fluid values in 37 forensic autopsy cases (postmortem interval within 67 hours) and evaluated their efficacy. Moreover, these values were compared between cases with and without liver cirrhosis (LC).
No significant difference was observed between antemortem and postmortem serum T-Bil levels. Although postmortem pericardial fluid T-Bil concentrations correlated with antemortem values, the pericardial fluid concentrations were significantly lower. The median postmortem pericardial fluid to antemortem serum T-Bil ratio was 0.41 ± 0.27. Although antemortem and postmortem serum T-Bil concentrations were significantly higher in the LC group than in the control group, no significant difference was observed in postmortem pericardial fluid T-Bil values.
This article highlights the utility of measuring serum and pericardial fluid T-Bil levels postmortem. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to evaluate the postmortem pericardial fluid to antemortem serum T-Bil ratio. Our results showed that this ratio was close to that reported in living patients. Therefore, postmortem pericardial fluid may serve as a significant alternative sampling source in cases where serum is unavailable. However, further evaluation of its diagnostic efficacy in LC is warranted.
由于大多数法医尸检病例缺乏近期生前生化数据作为参考,死后标本中总胆红素(T-Bil)测量的准确性尚不清楚。
本研究比较了37例法医尸检病例(死后间隔在67小时内)生前血清值、死后血清和心包液中T-Bil的浓度,并评估了它们的有效性。此外,还比较了有和没有肝硬化(LC)的病例之间的这些值。
生前和死后血清T-Bil水平之间未观察到显著差异。虽然死后心包液T-Bil浓度与生前值相关,但心包液浓度明显较低。死后心包液与生前血清T-Bil的中位数比值为0.41±0.27。虽然LC组生前和死后血清T-Bil浓度显著高于对照组,但死后心包液T-Bil值未观察到显著差异。
本文强调了死后测量血清和心包液T-Bil水平的实用性。据我们所知,本研究是首次评估死后心包液与生前血清T-Bil比值。我们的结果表明,该比值与活体患者报道的比值相近。因此,在心包液无法获得的情况下,死后心包液可能是一个重要的替代采样来源。然而,有必要进一步评估其在LC中的诊断效力。