Senapati Jayastu, Kadia Tapan M, Daver Naval G, DiNardo Courtney D, Borthakur Gautam, Ravandi Farhad, Kantarjian Hagop M
Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Cancer. 2025 Apr 1;131(7):e35806. doi: 10.1002/cncr.35806.
Focused research in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) biology and treatment has led to the identification of new therapeutic targets and several new drug approvals over the last decade. Progressive improvements in response and survival have mirrored these improvements in treatment options. Traditionally adverse subtypes such as FLT3-internal tandem duplication-positive AML now have better outcomes with potent FLT3 inhibitors, and menin inhibitors in KMT2A-rearranged and other MEIS/HOX-dependent leukemias hold promise toward improving outcomes. More patients with AML are now able to undergo a consolidative allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), and the rates of nonrelapse mortality with or without HSCT have also decreased. Comprehensive genomic interrogation of AML has elucidated mechanisms of response and resistance to treatments, which has enabled more precise decision algorithms and better prognostication. Deep levels of measurable residual disease assessment in some AML subsets hold the potential to dynamically modify treatment on the basis of these responses. Improving frontline intensive and low-intensity therapies, by incorporating venetoclax and other targeted agents, is the most important intervention to improve AML outcomes. Despite these developments, a sizeable percentage of AML, such as AML with TP53 or MECOM aberrations, postmyeloproliferative neoplasm AML, and so forth, remains as subsets without significant improvement in outcomes and no targeted options. Evolving strategies with natural killer cell-based approaches, novel antibody-drug conjugates, bispecific T-cell engagers, and engineered chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapies are being evaluated, and may fill the therapeutic vacuum for some of the high-risk AML subtypes.
在过去十年中,针对急性髓系白血病(AML)生物学和治疗的重点研究已促成了新治疗靶点的发现以及多项新药获批。缓解率和生存率的逐步提高反映了治疗选择的这些改善。传统上预后较差的亚型,如FLT3内部串联重复阳性AML,现在使用强效FLT3抑制剂有了更好的治疗结果,而KMT2A重排及其他MEIS/HOX依赖型白血病中的Menin抑制剂有望改善预后。现在更多AML患者能够接受巩固性异基因造血干细胞移植(HSCT),并且无论是否进行HSCT,非复发死亡率也有所下降。对AML进行全面的基因组分析已经阐明了对治疗的反应和耐药机制,这使得决策算法更加精确,预后判断也更准确。在某些AML亚组中进行深度可测量残留病评估有可能根据这些反应动态调整治疗方案。通过纳入维奈克拉和其他靶向药物来改进一线强化和低强度治疗,是改善AML预后的最重要干预措施。尽管有这些进展,但相当一部分AML,如伴有TP53或MECOM畸变的AML、骨髓增殖性肿瘤后AML等,仍然是预后没有显著改善且没有靶向治疗选择的亚组。基于自然杀伤细胞的方法、新型抗体药物偶联物、双特异性T细胞衔接器和工程化嵌合抗原受体T细胞疗法等不断发展的策略正在进行评估,可能会填补一些高危AML亚型的治疗空白。