• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
[Hospital service groups and quality indicators - A cross-comparison for pneumonia, ischemic stroke, and colorectal resection for carcinoma].[医院服务组与质量指标——肺炎、缺血性中风及结肠癌结肠切除术的交叉比较]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2025 Apr;150(9):e18-e27. doi: 10.1055/a-2530-3973. Epub 2025 Mar 19.
2
[Disease-specific patterns of hospital care in Germany analyzed via the German Inpatient Quality Indicators (G-IQI)].通过德国住院患者质量指标(G-IQI)分析德国医院护理的疾病特异性模式
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2012 Jul;137(28-29):1449-57. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1305086. Epub 2012 Jul 3.
3
Association Between Adherence to Quality Indicators and 7-Day In-Hospital Mortality After Acute Ischemic Stroke.急性缺血性脑卒中后,质量指标依从性与 7 天院内死亡率的相关性。
Stroke. 2020 Dec;51(12):3664-3672. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.029968. Epub 2020 Oct 12.
4
[Opportunities and limitations of risk adjustment of quality indicators based on inpatient administrative health data - a workshop report].[基于住院管理健康数据的质量指标风险调整的机遇与局限——一份研讨会报告]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2021 Jun;163:1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2021.04.003. Epub 2021 May 20.
5
[Impact of quality measurement, transparency and peer review on in-hospital mortality - retrospective before-after study with 63 hospitals].[质量评估、透明度及同行评审对住院死亡率的影响——对63家医院进行的回顾性前后对照研究]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2016 Oct;115-116:10-23. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2016.05.007. Epub 2016 Jul 2.
6
[Quality evaluation in colorectal surgery in dependence on health-care categories of hospitals - minor differences in outcome with room for improvement in process quality].[结直肠手术的质量评估取决于医院的医疗保健类别——结果差异不大,但过程质量仍有改进空间]
Gesundheitswesen. 2011 Mar;73(3):134-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1246214. Epub 2010 Mar 3.
7
Quality of care in large Chinese hospitals: an observational study.大型中国医院的医疗质量:一项观察性研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2019 Dec;28(12):963-970. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2018-008938. Epub 2019 May 20.
8
Reperfusion Therapy Frequency and Outcomes in Mild Ischemic Stroke in the United States.美国轻度缺血性卒中的再灌注治疗频率和结局。
Stroke. 2020 Nov;51(11):3241-3249. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.030898. Epub 2020 Oct 21.
9
Incorporating Present-on-Admission Indicators in Medicare Claims to Inform Hospital Quality Measure Risk Adjustment Models.将入院时指标纳入医疗保险索赔中,以告知医院质量衡量风险调整模型。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 May 3;4(5):e218512. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.8512.
10
[Rehabilitation in geriatric patients after ischemic stroke--a comparison of 2 organisational systems in Germany using claims data of a statutory health insurance fund].[老年缺血性脑卒中患者的康复——利用法定健康保险基金的理赔数据对德国两种组织系统的比较]
Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 2013 Dec;52(6):375-82. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1334914. Epub 2013 Jul 3.

本文引用的文献

1
Initial Cancer Treatment in Certified Versus Non-Certified Hospitals.认证医院与非认证医院的癌症初始治疗。
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2023 Sep 29;120(39):647-654. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.m2023.0169.
2
COVID-19 and Severe Acute Respiratory Infections: Monitoring Trends in 421 German Hospitals During the First Four Pandemic Waves.新冠病毒肺炎与严重急性呼吸道感染:德国421家医院在疫情前四波期间的监测趋势
Infect Drug Resist. 2023 May 8;16:2775-2781. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S402313. eCollection 2023.
3
Evidence-based quality standards improve prognosis in colon cancer care.循证质量标准可改善结肠癌治疗预后。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2018 Sep;44(9):1324-1330. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.05.013. Epub 2018 May 17.
4
[Good Practice of Secondary Data Analysis (GPS): guidelines and recommendations].[二次数据分析的良好实践(GPS):指南与建议]
Gesundheitswesen. 2015 Feb;77(2):120-6. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1396815. Epub 2015 Jan 26.

[医院服务组与质量指标——肺炎、缺血性中风及结肠癌结肠切除术的交叉比较]

[Hospital service groups and quality indicators - A cross-comparison for pneumonia, ischemic stroke, and colorectal resection for carcinoma].

作者信息

Nimptsch Ulrike, Schmithausen Daniel, Winklmair Claudia, Busse Reinhard, Augurzky Boris, Kuhlen Ralf

机构信息

Technische Universität Berlin, Fachgebiet Management im Gesundheitswesen.

Solventum Germany GmbH.

出版信息

Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2025 Apr;150(9):e18-e27. doi: 10.1055/a-2530-3973. Epub 2025 Mar 19.

DOI:10.1055/a-2530-3973
PMID:40107288
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12020711/
Abstract

In Germany, the Hospital Care Improvement Act (Krankenhausversorgungsverbesserungsgesetz) will introduce service groups for hospital reserve financing. The hospital planning of the federal states is also intended to allocate care contracts to hospitals based on service groups in conjunction with structural quality criteria. This paper analyzes service group-specific differences in treatment case characteristics as well as differences in process and outcome quality indicators.The study used the frequent treatment causes of pneumonia, cerebral infarction and colorectal resection for carcinoma as examples. Administrative data for the year 2023 from 422 hospitals were analyzed. Treatment cases were assigned to NRW hospital service groups and, in a cross comparison, to figures of the German Inpatient Quality Indicators (G-IQI).For the treatment causes of pneumonia (N=129666), cerebral infarction (N=95762) and colorectal resection for carcinoma (N=16578), more than 60% of cases were assigned to one dominant service group, while the remaining cases were distributed across different service groups. Care characteristics differed according to the service group assignment. For example, intracranial thrombectomy was documented in 10.3% of cases with cerebral infarction overall (9856 of 95762 cases). In the "Stroke Unit" service group, this proportion was 11.3% (6790 of 60246 cases), in the "General Neurology" service group it was 5.7% (836 of 14692 cases).The assignment of cases to service groups primarily reflects the type of care. To promote the intended control effect with the aim of increasing the hospital's specialization, the classification of service groups might be more strongly oriented towards the clinical care requirements of relevant treatment causes.

摘要

在德国,《医院护理改善法案》(Krankenhausversorgungsverbesserungsgesetz)将引入用于医院储备资金的服务组。联邦州的医院规划还打算根据服务组并结合结构质量标准将护理合同分配给医院。本文分析了特定服务组在治疗病例特征方面的差异以及过程和结果质量指标方面的差异。该研究以肺炎、脑梗死和结肠癌大肠切除术等常见治疗病因为例。分析了2023年来自422家医院的行政数据。将治疗病例分配到北莱茵 - 威斯特法伦州(NRW)医院服务组,并通过交叉比较,与德国住院患者质量指标(G - IQI)的数据进行对比。对于肺炎(N = 129666)、脑梗死(N = 95762)和结肠癌大肠切除术(N = 16578)的治疗病因,超过60%的病例被分配到一个主要服务组,而其余病例则分布在不同服务组。护理特征因服务组分配而异。例如,总体上10.3%的脑梗死病例(95762例中的9856例)记录了颅内血栓切除术。在“卒中单元”服务组中,这一比例为11.3%(60246例中的6790例),在“普通神经科”服务组中为5.7%(14692例中的836例)。病例分配到服务组主要反映了护理类型。为了以提高医院专业化为目标促进预期的控制效果,服务组的分类可能更强烈地以相关治疗病因的临床护理要求为导向。