Abdulrabba Sadiya, Facchini Jessica, Manson Gerome Aleandro
School of Kinesiology and Health Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario K7L 3N6, Canada.
School of Kinesiology and Health Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario K7L 3N6, Canada
eNeuro. 2025 Apr 10;12(4). doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0548-24.2025. Print 2025 Apr.
Humans can adapt their movements in response to expected and unexpected perturbations. The speed and accuracy of these movement corrections may depend on the type of sensory information driving the perception of these perturbations. While previous research has indicated that corrections based on somatosensory information, comprised of proprioceptive and tactile inputs, are faster than corrections based on visual information, other studies have found comparable correction speeds in response to visual and tactile inputs. The purpose of this study was to systematically investigate the latencies (how fast) and magnitudes (how large) of movement corrections in response to perturbations of external visual targets, as well as somatosensory (proprioceptive and tactile) and tactile targets on the non-reaching limb. Participants performed reaching movements to a light-emitting diode (i.e., visual target), the felt position of a brush touching the index finger of the non-reaching hand (i.e., a tactile target), and the index finger of their non-reaching hand (somatosensory target). During some trials, the target was displaced 3 cm away or toward the participant either before or after the movement onset. Participants demonstrated faster and larger corrections to somatosensory target perturbations than to visual or tactile target perturbations. However, corrections to visual targets were more accurate than corrections to tactile targets. These findings support the hypothesis that distinct sensorimotor processes may underlie the adjustments made in response to somatosensory information versus those made in response to visual and tactile information.
人类能够根据预期和意外的干扰来调整自身动作。这些动作校正的速度和准确性可能取决于驱动对这些干扰感知的感觉信息类型。虽然先前的研究表明,基于包含本体感觉和触觉输入的体感信息进行的校正比基于视觉信息的校正更快,但其他研究发现,对视觉和触觉输入的校正速度相当。本研究的目的是系统地调查对外部视觉目标、非伸手肢体上的体感(本体感觉和触觉)和触觉目标的干扰做出反应时,动作校正的延迟(速度有多快)和幅度(程度有多大)。参与者向发光二极管(即视觉目标)、触摸非伸手手食指的刷子的感觉位置(即触觉目标)以及非伸手手的食指(体感目标)进行伸手动作。在一些试验中,目标在动作开始之前或之后向参与者移开或移近3厘米。与视觉或触觉目标干扰相比,参与者对体感目标干扰的校正更快、幅度更大。然而,对视觉目标的校正比对触觉目标的校正更准确。这些发现支持了这样一种假设,即不同的感觉运动过程可能是对体感信息做出的调整与对视觉和触觉信息做出的调整的基础。