Spence Samantha, O'Leary Catherine, Goode Tyric, Tripathi Rohan, Gutierrez Alexxis, Naidu Aniketh, Mehrez Maysam, Fleetwood Vidyaratna, Varma Chintalapati, Randall Henry, Nazzal Mustafa
Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Transplant Proc. 2025 May;57(4):569-574. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2025.02.033. Epub 2025 Mar 18.
This study aims to determine whether intraoperative analysis of arterial and portal venous flow using transit time flow measurement (TTFM) data is associated with a reduced incidence of vascular complications after orthotopic liver transplantation.
This is a retrospective chart review of all adult orthotopic liver transplant recipients at Saint Louis University Hospital from 2015-2020 (n = 188). We reviewed intraoperative flow probe use, as well as documentation of abnormal flow patterns detected during surgery. Normal graft flow measurements were defined as hepatic artery flow >100 ml/min and portal vein flow >0.5 ml/min/gram-liver. Postoperative imaging and ultrasonographic data were then reviewed for reports of vascular complications requiring intervention between the time of transplant and December 31, 2020. The incidence of VCs was compared between those who received intraoperative TTFM and those who did not. We then compared the demographic composition of these 2 groups to ensure similarity and screen for potential confounding factors.
188 liver transplant operative reports met the criteria for inclusion and were reviewed. TTFM use was documented in 78 (41.5%) cases and abnormal flow was detected in 8 (10.3%) of these cases, prompting intraoperative correction. Subsequently, no patients who received intraoperative TTFM developed vascular complications during the postoperative course. Conversely, of the 110 (58.5%) cases with no reported intraoperative flow data, 6 (5.5%, P = .042) patients later developed vascular complications. Reported vascular complications included hepatic artery stenosis, hepatic artery thrombosis, portal vein thrombosis, hepatic vein thrombosis, and IVC thrombosis. There was no significant difference in patient population between patients who received intraoperative TTFM and those who did not, apart from the type of liver implantation. There was a significantly higher prevalence of bicaval liver implantations in the group of patients who did not receive TTFM than those who did (P = .002).
Transit time flow measurement may be a useful tool for the detection of vascular flow abnormalities intraoperatively, allowing for early correction and prevention of vascular complications during the postoperative course. This could potentially result in enhanced graft survival and reduced recipient mortality following orthotopic liver transplantation.
本研究旨在确定使用渡越时间血流测量(TTFM)数据对肝动脉和门静脉血流进行术中分析是否与原位肝移植后血管并发症发生率降低相关。
这是一项对2015年至2020年圣路易斯大学医院所有成年原位肝移植受者的回顾性病历审查(n = 188)。我们审查了术中血流探头的使用情况,以及手术期间检测到的异常血流模式的记录。正常移植物血流测量定义为肝动脉血流>100 ml/分钟和门静脉血流>0.5 ml/分钟/克肝脏。然后回顾术后影像学和超声数据,以获取移植后至2020年12月31日期间需要干预的血管并发症报告。比较接受术中TTFM的患者和未接受术中TTFM的患者的血管并发症发生率。然后我们比较了这两组患者的人口统计学组成,以确保相似性并筛查潜在的混杂因素。
188份肝移植手术报告符合纳入标准并进行了审查。78例(41.5%)记录了TTFM的使用情况,其中8例(10.3%)检测到异常血流,促使术中进行纠正。随后,接受术中TTFM的患者在术后过程中均未发生血管并发症。相反,在110例(58.5%)未报告术中血流数据的病例中,有6例(5.5%,P = 0.042)患者后来发生了血管并发症。报告的血管并发症包括肝动脉狭窄、肝动脉血栓形成、门静脉血栓形成、肝静脉血栓形成和下腔静脉血栓形成。接受术中TTFM的患者和未接受术中TTFM的患者在患者人群方面没有显著差异,除了肝植入类型。未接受TTFM的患者组中双腔肝植入的患病率显著高于接受TTFM的患者组(P = 0.002)。
渡越时间血流测量可能是术中检测血管血流异常的有用工具,可在术后过程中进行早期纠正并预防血管并发症。这可能会提高原位肝移植后的移植物存活率并降低受者死亡率。