Schwendler Teresa R, Keller Kathleen L, Jensen Leif, Na Muzi, Fofana Mohamed L, Daffé Mamady, Sankhon Hermine, Kodish Stephen R
Department of Nutritional Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, State College, Pennsylvania, USA.
Department of Food Science, The Pennsylvania State University, State College, Pennsylvania, USA.
Matern Child Nutr. 2025 Jul;21(3):e70017. doi: 10.1111/mcn.70017. Epub 2025 Mar 19.
The aim of this study was to assess the extent to which specific feeding styles may be associated with the diets of infants aged 6-9 months in Guinea. This study was designed to have multiple, iterative phases with methodological triangulation. During Phase 1 of data collection, direct observations (n = 10) were used to develop a tailored tool for Phase 2, during which 72 meal observations were conducted among infants aged 6-9 months to define caregiver feeding styles. Specific behaviours underlying established feeding styles were recorded at the level of the intended bite. Following each observation, infant diet diversity scores (DDS), or the number of food groups consumed in the previous 24 h, were collected. During Phase 3, we interviewed 34 caregivers to understand the drivers of their feeding styles. Caregiver feeding styles were determined using cluster analysis of observed behaviours and a linear regression was used to explore the relationship between feeding style and infant DDS. Textual data from interviews were thematically analysed to explain the drivers of feeding style. Caregivers were characterized as those using forceful (n = 12), responsive (n = 52) or uninvolved (n = 8) feeding styles. Our study found that responsive feeding was not associated with a higher DDS when controlling for child age in months. The most salient factors shaping feeding style in this setting included perception around infant and young child developmental stage, food refusals and trust in infant cues. Overall, food insecurity may need to be addressed in addition to feeding styles to improve DDS.
本研究的目的是评估特定喂养方式与几内亚6至9个月婴儿饮食之间的关联程度。本研究设计了多个迭代阶段,并采用了方法学三角互证法。在数据收集的第一阶段,通过直接观察(n = 10)来开发适用于第二阶段的定制工具,在此期间,对6至9个月的婴儿进行了72次进餐观察,以确定照顾者的喂养方式。在预期咬食层面记录既定喂养方式背后的具体行为。每次观察后,收集婴儿饮食多样性得分(DDS),即前24小时内摄入的食物种类数量。在第三阶段,我们采访了34名照顾者,以了解他们喂养方式的驱动因素。通过对观察到的行为进行聚类分析来确定照顾者的喂养方式,并使用线性回归来探索喂养方式与婴儿DDS之间的关系。对访谈的文本数据进行主题分析,以解释喂养方式的驱动因素。照顾者被分为采用强制喂养方式(n = 12)、响应式喂养方式(n = 52)或不参与喂养方式(n = 8)的人群。我们的研究发现,在控制婴儿月龄的情况下,响应式喂养与较高的DDS无关。在这种情况下,塑造喂养方式的最显著因素包括对婴幼儿发育阶段的认知、食物拒绝以及对婴儿暗示的信任。总体而言,除了喂养方式外,可能还需要解决粮食不安全问题,以改善DDS。