• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Questioning the classification of "high blood flow" versus "low blood flow" ECCO₂R in ultra-low tidal volume ventilation studies: a call for functional classification.对超低潮气量通气研究中“高血流量”与“低血流量”体外二氧化碳清除（ECCO₂R）分类的质疑：呼吁进行功能分类。
Crit Care. 2025 Mar 19;29(1):121. doi: 10.1186/s13054-025-05352-4.
2
Feasibility and safety of ultra-low volume ventilation (≤ 3 ml/kg) combined with extra corporeal carbon dioxide removal (ECCOR) in acute respiratory failure patients.超低容量通气（≤3毫升/千克）联合体外二氧化碳清除（ECCOR）用于急性呼吸衰竭患者的可行性和安全性。
Crit Care. 2024 Dec 27;28(1):433. doi: 10.1186/s13054-024-05168-8.
3
Extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal for the treatment of acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure: the REST RCT.体外二氧化碳清除治疗急性低氧性呼吸衰竭：REST随机对照试验
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Jul;29(33):1-16. doi: 10.3310/GJDM0320.
4
Extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal for patients with acute respiratory failure secondary to the acute respiratory distress syndrome: a systematic review.体外二氧化碳清除治疗急性呼吸窘迫综合征继发急性呼吸衰竭患者：一项系统评价
Crit Care. 2014 May 15;18(3):222. doi: 10.1186/cc13875.
5
Feasibility and safety of low-flow extracorporeal CO removal managed with a renal replacement platform to enhance lung-protective ventilation of patients with mild-to-moderate ARDS.应用肾脏替代平台管理低流量体外 CO 去除对轻中度 ARDS 患者实施肺保护性通气的可行性和安全性。
Crit Care. 2018 May 10;22(1):122. doi: 10.1186/s13054-018-2038-5.
6
Feasibility and safety of low-flow extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal to facilitate ultra-protective ventilation in patients with moderate acute respiratory distress sindrome.低流量体外二氧化碳清除促进中度急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者超保护性通气的可行性和安全性。
Crit Care. 2016 Feb 10;20:36. doi: 10.1186/s13054-016-1211-y.
7
Venovenous extracorporeal CO removal to support ultraprotective ventilation in moderate-severe acute respiratory distress syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature.静脉-静脉体外 CO 去除以支持中重度急性呼吸窘迫综合征的超保护性通气：文献的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Perfusion. 2023 Jul;38(5):1062-1079. doi: 10.1177/02676591221096225. Epub 2022 Jun 2.
8
Extracorporeal CO removal in severe respiratory acidotic intubated patients: A seven year experience observational study.重度呼吸性酸中毒插管患者的体外二氧化碳清除：一项七年的观察性研究。
Respir Med. 2025 Apr-May;240:108011. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2025.108011. Epub 2025 Feb 23.
9
Lung protective ventilation strategy for the acute respiratory distress syndrome.急性呼吸窘迫综合征的肺保护性通气策略
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Feb 28;2013(2):CD003844. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003844.pub4.
10
Ventilation with lower tidal volumes versus traditional tidal volumes in adults for acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome.成人急性肺损伤和急性呼吸窘迫综合征中低潮气量通气与传统潮气量通气的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004(2):CD003844. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003844.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
"High blood flow" versus "low blood flow" ECCOR: how to classify-author's reply.“高血流量”与“低血流量”体外循环心脏复苏（ECCOR）：如何分类——作者回复
Crit Care. 2025 Apr 18;29(1):156. doi: 10.1186/s13054-025-05386-8.

本文引用的文献

1
Feasibility and safety of ultra-low volume ventilation (≤ 3 ml/kg) combined with extra corporeal carbon dioxide removal (ECCOR) in acute respiratory failure patients.超低容量通气（≤3毫升/千克）联合体外二氧化碳清除（ECCOR）用于急性呼吸衰竭患者的可行性和安全性。
Crit Care. 2024 Dec 27;28(1):433. doi: 10.1186/s13054-024-05168-8.
2
In vitro characterization of PrismaLung+: a novel ECCOR device.PrismaLung+体外特性：一种新型体外心肺复苏设备
Intensive Care Med Exp. 2020 May 13;8(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s40635-020-00301-7.
3
Low-flow assessment of current ECMO/ECCOR rotary blood pumps and the potential effect on hemocompatibility.当前 ECMO/ECCOR 旋转血泵的低流量评估及其对血液相容性的潜在影响。
Crit Care. 2019 Nov 6;23(1):348. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2622-3.
4
Efficacy and safety of lower versus higher CO extraction devices to allow ultraprotective ventilation: secondary analysis of the SUPERNOVA study.低 CO 提取装置与高 CO 提取装置在允许超保护性通气中的疗效和安全性比较：SUPERNOVA 研究的二次分析。
Thorax. 2019 Dec;74(12):1179-1181. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2019-213591. Epub 2019 Aug 13.

Questioning the classification of "high blood flow" versus "low blood flow" ECCO₂R in ultra-low tidal volume ventilation studies: a call for functional classification.

作者信息

Wang Minmin, Yao Qiang, Zhu Mingli

机构信息

Medical Affairs, Vantive Health LLC, Shanghai, China.

Department of Critical Care Medicine, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Crit Care. 2025 Mar 19;29(1):121. doi: 10.1186/s13054-025-05352-4.

DOI:10.1186/s13054-025-05352-4
PMID:40108676
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11921688/
Abstract
摘要