Gamboa Denisse Alejandra, Flynn Peter J, Horna-Lowell Eva Sofia, Pinter-Wollman Noa
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.
Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, 02138, USA.
Anim Microbiome. 2025 Mar 19;7(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s42523-025-00390-3.
All animals harbor microbiomes, which are obtained from the surrounding environment and are impacted by host behavior and life stage. To determine how two non-mutually exclusive drivers - physical environment and social organization - affect an organism's microbiome, we examined the bacterial communities within and around nests of harvester ants (Veromessor andrei). We collected soil and nest content samples from five different ant nests. We used 16S rRNA gene sequencing and calculated alpha and beta diversity to compare bacterial diversity and community composition across samples. To test the hypotheses that physical environment and/or social organization impact ant colonies' community of microbes we compared our samples across (i) sample types (ants, brood, seeds and reproductives (winged alates), and soil), (ii) soil inside and outside the nest, and (iii) soil from different chamber types. Interestingly, we found that both the environment and social organization impact the bacterial communities of the microbiome of V. andrei colonies. Soil from the five nests differed from one another in a way that mapped onto their geographical distance. Furthermore, soil from inside the nests resembled the surrounding soil, supporting the physical environment hypothesis. However, the bacterial communities associated with the contents within the nest chambers, i.e., ants, brood, seeds, and reproductives, differed from one another and from the surrounding soil, supporting the social organization hypotheses. This study highlights the importance of considering environmental and social factors in understanding microbiome dynamics.
所有动物都有微生物群落,这些微生物群落来自周围环境,并受到宿主行为和生命阶段的影响。为了确定两个并非相互排斥的驱动因素——物理环境和社会组织——如何影响生物体的微生物群落,我们研究了收获蚁(Veromessor andrei)巢穴内部和周围的细菌群落。我们从五个不同的蚁巢中采集了土壤和巢穴内容物样本。我们使用16S rRNA基因测序,并计算了α和β多样性,以比较样本间的细菌多样性和群落组成。为了检验物理环境和/或社会组织影响蚁群微生物群落的假设,我们对样本进行了以下比较:(i)样本类型(蚂蚁、幼虫、种子和繁殖蚁(有翅蚁)以及土壤),(ii)巢内和巢外的土壤,以及(iii)不同类型巢室的土壤。有趣的是,我们发现环境和社会组织都会影响收获蚁群落的微生物细菌群落。五个蚁巢的土壤彼此不同,这种差异与它们的地理距离相关。此外,巢内土壤与周围土壤相似,这支持了物理环境假设。然而,与巢室内的内容物(即蚂蚁、幼虫、种子和繁殖蚁)相关的细菌群落彼此不同,且与周围土壤也不同,这支持了社会组织假设。这项研究强调了在理解微生物群落动态时考虑环境和社会因素的重要性。