Wong Jennifer S, Neilsen Kia, Gushue Kelsey, Lee Chelsey
Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada.
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2025 Sep;69(12):1781-1804. doi: 10.1177/0306624X251327574. Epub 2025 Mar 20.
Halfway houses operate as a form of community supervision, offering a unique opportunity for individuals who have offended to receive housing, support, and other resources to aid in navigating the challenges of re-entry from closed custody. Despite being controversial in the eyes of the public, they have long been viewed by stakeholders as a worthwhile intervention. However, existing literature presents mixed findings on their utility. The current study provides a systematic review and meta-analysis of nine studies providing 17 effect sizes on the effects of halfway houses on recidivism. Findings indicate that halfway houses do not result in any differences for treatment versus comparison group participants with respect to outcomes of arrest ( = 6), conviction ( = 5), or incarceration ( = 6). Additional research is needed to inform best practices for structure and services, and how best to respond to differing participant needs.
中途之家作为一种社区监督形式运作,为有犯罪记录的个人提供了一个独特的机会,使他们能够获得住房、支持和其他资源,以帮助应对从封闭式拘留重新融入社会的挑战。尽管在公众眼中存在争议,但利益相关者长期以来一直认为这是一种值得的干预措施。然而,现有文献对其效用的研究结果不一。本研究对九项研究进行了系统综述和荟萃分析,这些研究提供了17个关于中途之家对累犯影响的效应量。研究结果表明,在逮捕(n = 6)、定罪(n = 5)或监禁(n = 6)结果方面,中途之家对治疗组和对照组参与者没有产生任何差异。需要进一步的研究来为中途之家的结构和服务的最佳实践提供信息,以及如何最好地满足不同参与者的需求。