Marella Prashanti, Ramanan Mahesh, Tabah Alexis, Litton Ed, Edwards Felicity, Laupland Kevin B
Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Caboolture Hospital, Metro North Hospital and Health Services, Brisbane, Australia.
Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Crit Care Resusc. 2025 Feb 28;27(1):100096. doi: 10.1016/j.ccrj.2024.12.002. eCollection 2025 Mar.
It is unknown whether a volume-outcome relationship exists for patients who receive tracheostomy in the intensive care unit (ICU) as has been observed in other healthcare settings. This study aimed to determine the average number of tracheostomies performed per intensivist per ICU in Australia and New Zealand and associations with case fatality.
A retrospective cohort study of adult ICU admissions was conducted.
Data from the Australia and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Adult Patient Database and Critical care resources registry were linked and analysed over the time period extending from 01 January 2018 to 31 March 2023.
The study population included adults (aged ≥18 years) admitted to Australia and New Zealand ICUs who received tracheostomy.
No intervention was reported.
The primary exposure variable was tracheostomies per intensivist (TPIs), which was calculated as (the number of patients who had tracheostomy inserted during their ICU admission)/(the total number of intensivists), for each site for each financial year.
There were 9318 patients from 172 ICUs over a 5-year period, from January 2018 to March 2023, who received tracheostomies and were included in this analysis. The median TPI value was 3.1 (interquartile range: 1.9-4.3). Raw case fatality in the total cohort was 13.7% (1280/9318). The lowest adjusted risk of death (8.5%, 95% confidence interval: 3.63%-13.36%) was observed when the TPI value was equal to 10.3, with higher risk of death observed at lower values of TPI.
A volume-outcome relationship was observed between TPI value and hospital case fatality, with lower case fatality at higher TPI values across the entire range of TPI.
在重症监护病房(ICU)接受气管切开术的患者中,是否存在与其他医疗环境中观察到的类似的手术量-预后关系尚不清楚。本研究旨在确定澳大利亚和新西兰每个ICU每位重症监护医生实施气管切开术的平均数量,以及与病死率的关联。
对成人ICU入院患者进行回顾性队列研究。
将澳大利亚和新西兰重症监护学会成人患者数据库和重症监护资源登记处的数据在2018年1月1日至2023年3月31日期间进行关联和分析。
研究人群包括在澳大利亚和新西兰ICU接受气管切开术的成年人(年龄≥18岁)。
未报告干预措施。
主要暴露变量是每位重症监护医生气管切开术数量(TPIs),计算方法为(在ICU住院期间接受气管切开术的患者数量)/(重症监护医生总数),每个财政年度每个地点均如此计算。
在2018年1月至2023年3月的5年期间,来自172个ICU的9318例患者接受了气管切开术并纳入本分析。TPIs的中位数为3.1(四分位间距:1.9 - 4.3)。整个队列的原始病死率为13.7%(1280/9318)。当TPIs值等于10.3时,观察到最低的校正死亡风险(8.5%,95%置信区间:3.63% - 13.36%),TPIs值较低时死亡风险较高。
观察到TPIs值与医院病死率之间存在手术量-预后关系 在TPIs的整个范围内,TPIs值越高,病死率越低。