文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

一项培训干预措施对随时间推移的上消化道内镜检查质量的影响:多中心比较队列研究。

Impact of a training intervention on upper gastrointestinal endoscopy quality over time: Multicenter comparative cohort study.

作者信息

Koggel Lieke Maria, van Berlo Jole P E, Indemans Fleur A, Schrauwen Ruud W M, Lantinga Marten A, Siersema Peter D

机构信息

Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, Netherlands.

Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Maasziekenhuis Pantein, Boxmeer, Netherlands.

出版信息

Endosc Int Open. 2025 Mar 14;13:a25260240. doi: 10.1055/a-2526-0240. eCollection 2025.


DOI:10.1055/a-2526-0240
PMID:40109322
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11922177/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) formulated performance measures to improve the detection rate for upper gastrointestinal (UGI) endoscopy. We aimed to assess adherence to and impact of training on adherence to performance measures for UGI endoscopy. METHODS: In this multicenter, prospective, cohort study, endoscopists at three centers underwent 1-hour face-to-face training based on ESGE and BSG procedure performance measures (≥ 7-minute inspection time; photodocumentation of ≥ 10 anatomical landmarks + abnormalities; standardized terminology; biopsy protocols). A self-developed quality assessment score was used to assess diagnostic UGI endoscopies before (control group) and after (intervention group) training. The primary endpoint was improvement in overall quality score (percentage of the maximum score). RESULTS: Of 1,733 consecutive UGI endoscopies, 570 were eligible for inclusion (mean patient age 60 years [standard deviation 15]; male 47%): 285 in the control group and 285 in the intervention group. Overall quality score increased from 60% before to 67% after the training intervention (difference 7%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 5-10, < 0.001). Male patients (3.2%, 95% CI 0.7-5.7), alarming features (-3.1%, 95% CI -5.6 to -0.5), and endoscopist age (-0.4% increment per year, 95% CI -0.8 to -0.1) were associated with higher quality scores. CONCLUSIONS: Adherence to the ESGE and BSG procedure performance measures for UGI endoscopy persistently increased after a 1-hour face-to-face training intervention, suggesting that a simple training intervention tool can improve the quality of UGI endoscopy and potentially could prevent missed lesions.

摘要

背景与研究目的:欧洲胃肠内镜学会(ESGE)和英国胃肠病学会(BSG)制定了性能指标,以提高上消化道(UGI)内镜检查的检出率。我们旨在评估对UGI内镜检查性能指标的依从性以及培训对依从性的影响。 方法:在这项多中心、前瞻性队列研究中,三个中心的内镜医师接受了基于ESGE和BSG操作性能指标(检查时间≥7分钟;拍摄≥10个解剖标志+异常的照片记录;标准化术语;活检方案)的1小时面对面培训。使用自行开发的质量评估分数来评估培训前(对照组)和培训后(干预组)的诊断性UGI内镜检查。主要终点是总体质量分数的提高(最高分数的百分比)。 结果:在1733例连续的UGI内镜检查中,570例符合纳入标准(患者平均年龄60岁[标准差15];男性占47%):对照组285例,干预组285例。培训干预后,总体质量分数从之前的60%提高到67%(差异7%,95%置信区间[CI]5-10,<0.001)。男性患者(3.2%,95%CI 0.7-5.7)、警示特征(-3.1%,95%CI -5.6至-0.5)和内镜医师年龄(每年增加-0.4%,95%CI -0.8至-0.1)与更高的质量分数相关。 结论:在1小时的面对面培训干预后,对ESGE和BSG的UGI内镜检查操作性能指标的依从性持续提高,这表明一个简单的培训干预工具可以提高UGI内镜检查的质量,并有可能预防漏诊病变。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c0c0/11922177/73bfa868287c/10-1055-a-2526-0240_25294028.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c0c0/11922177/727e40083ebc/10-1055-a-2526-0240_25294065.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c0c0/11922177/d5fffb482c4d/10-1055-a-2526-0240_25294026.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c0c0/11922177/d8102335c1bc/10-1055-a-2526-0240_25294027.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c0c0/11922177/73bfa868287c/10-1055-a-2526-0240_25294028.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c0c0/11922177/727e40083ebc/10-1055-a-2526-0240_25294065.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c0c0/11922177/d5fffb482c4d/10-1055-a-2526-0240_25294026.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c0c0/11922177/d8102335c1bc/10-1055-a-2526-0240_25294027.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c0c0/11922177/73bfa868287c/10-1055-a-2526-0240_25294028.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Impact of a training intervention on upper gastrointestinal endoscopy quality over time: Multicenter comparative cohort study.

Endosc Int Open. 2025-3-14

[2]
Quality of upper GI endoscopy: a prospective cohort study on impact of endoscopist education.

Gastrointest Endosc. 2022-9

[3]
Curriculum for optical diagnosis training in Europe: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Position Statement.

Endoscopy. 2020-10

[4]
Adherence to European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Quality Performance Measures for Upper and Lower Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: A Nationwide Survey From the Italian Society of Digestive Endoscopy.

Front Med (Lausanne). 2022-4-6

[5]
Training in basic gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures: a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and European Society of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Nurses and Associates (ESGENA) Position Statement.

Endoscopy. 2024-2

[6]
Quality of Reporting in Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: Effect of a Simple Audit Intervention.

GE Port J Gastroenterol. 2018-12

[7]
Diagnosis and management of nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline.

Endoscopy. 2015-9-29

[8]
Umbrella systematic review of potential quality indicators for the detection of dysplasia and cancer at upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Endosc Int Open. 2023-9-15

[9]
Diagnosis and management of Barrett esophagus: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline.

Endoscopy. 2023-12

[10]
Reducing the environmental footprint of gastrointestinal endoscopy: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and European Society of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Nurses and Associates (ESGENA) Position Statement.

Endoscopy. 2022-8

本文引用的文献

[1]
What is the Prevalence of Clinically Significant Endoscopic Findings in Subjects With Dyspepsia? Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023-7

[2]
Quality of upper GI endoscopy: a prospective cohort study on impact of endoscopist education.

Gastrointest Endosc. 2022-9

[3]
Endoscopic tissue sampling - Part 1: Upper gastrointestinal and hepatopancreatobiliary tracts. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline.

Endoscopy. 2021-11

[4]
Epidemiology of gastric cancer: global trends, risk factors and prevention.

Prz Gastroenterol. 2019

[5]
Quality of Reporting in Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: Effect of a Simple Audit Intervention.

GE Port J Gastroenterol. 2018-12

[6]
An Asian consensus on standards of diagnostic upper endoscopy for neoplasia.

Gut. 2018-11-12

[7]
Appropriateness of Indications of Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy and its Association With Positive Finding.

JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc. 2018

[8]
Quality standards in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a position statement of the British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) and Association of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland (AUGIS).

Gut. 2017-11

[9]
Quality indicators for esophagogastroduodenoscopy: A comparative study of outcomes after an improvement programme in a tertiary hospital.

Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017-11

[10]
Performance measures for lower gastrointestinal endoscopy: a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Quality Improvement Initiative.

Endoscopy. 2017-4

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索