Suppr超能文献

制定健康方法学习社区评分标准的多学科参与式过程。

The multidisciplinary and participatory process to develop the Rubric for Learning Communities about Health Approaches.

作者信息

Ter Bogt Maud J J, Tobi Hilde, van Straten Christine G J I, Molleman Gerard R M, van den Muijsenbergh Maria E T C, Bevelander Kirsten E, Fransen Gerdine A J

机构信息

Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands.

AMPHI Academic Collaborative Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2025 Mar 5;13:1453197. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1453197. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Many Dutch municipalities implement a systems approach to promote health behavior among citizens. Learning communities (LCs) in these approaches enable stakeholders to collaborate and learn from one another. To optimize LCs, insights are needed into how LCs create knowledge and put it into action. This study aimed to describe the multidisciplinary and participatory process to develop a rubric for multidisciplinary Learning communities about health approaches.

METHODS

The rubric development took the form of a questionnaire, and was centred on a municipal healthy weight approach. The development consisted of three steps: (1) an iterative process involving literature and input from members and experts, (2) an expert session, and (3) qualitative and quantitative rubric reliability and usability tests.

RESULTS

Five rubric versions were developed, resulting in a final version with eight constructs to assess LC partnership experiences, learning, and action. The rubric demonstrated a relatively high reliability. The rubric's adequate usability performance was evidenced by its high response rate, which enabled researchers to gain insights into notable findings. These findings then facilitated discussions among LC members and formulated LC adjustments.

DISCUSSION

The participative process played a crucial role in developing the rubric. LC facilitators are encouraged to apply the rubric. Future research is needed regarding the reliability and usability of the rubric in other settings.

摘要

引言

许多荷兰市政当局采用系统方法来促进公民的健康行为。在这些方法中,学习社区(LCs)使利益相关者能够相互协作并相互学习。为了优化学习社区,需要深入了解学习社区如何创造知识并将其付诸行动。本研究旨在描述为多学科健康方法学习社区制定评分标准的多学科参与过程。

方法

评分标准的制定采用问卷调查的形式,以市政健康体重方法为中心。制定过程包括三个步骤:(1)一个涉及文献以及成员和专家意见的迭代过程,(2)一次专家会议,以及(3)评分标准的定性和定量可靠性及可用性测试。

结果

共制定了五个评分标准版本,最终版本包含八个构建要素,用于评估学习社区的伙伴关系经验、学习情况和行动。该评分标准显示出相对较高的可靠性。其高回复率证明了评分标准具有足够的可用性,这使研究人员能够深入了解显著发现。这些发现随后促进了学习社区成员之间的讨论并制定了学习社区的调整措施。

讨论

参与过程在评分标准的制定中发挥了关键作用。鼓励学习社区促进者应用该评分标准。未来需要针对该评分标准在其他环境中的可靠性和可用性进行研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ee6/11919888/ac1e73747693/fpubh-13-1453197-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验