Suppr超能文献

前房与瞳孔后虹膜爪型人工晶状体固定术临床结果比较:一项系统评价

Anterior chamber and retropupillary iris-claw intar ocular lens fixation comparison of clinical outcomes: a systematic review.

作者信息

Moghib Khaled, Salomon Izere, Abdelglel Yasmeen, Amer Samr A, Salah Ammar, Batarseh Suhel F, Abbas Nagham Bushara, Hassan Amr K

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.

Medical research group of Egypt, Negida Academy, Arlington, Massachusetts.

出版信息

Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2025 Jan 9;87(1):299-308. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000002856. eCollection 2025 Jan.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In cataract surgery, optimal intraocular lens (IOL) placement is typically within the capsular bag. However, in the absence of sufficient capsular support, alternative techniques such as scleral-sutured IOLs, anterior chamber IOLs, and iris-fixated IOLs either in the anterior chamber or retropupillary are employed. The choice between these methods depends on factors like surgeon expertise, patient-specific anatomy, and clinical circumstances, with anterior chamber iris-claw IOLs offering a more straightforward approach and retropupillary techniques potentially providing additional benefits requiring advanced skills.

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review aims to evaluate the clinical outcomes of anterior chamber versus retropupillary iris-claw IOLs fixation.

METHODS

Adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis guidelines, a comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed, Cochrane Central, Scopus, and Web of Science databases until May 2024. These searches focused on specific terms related to the methods, and data were extracted using a standardized online sheet.

RESULTS

The review encompassed nine studies, including two randomized control trials (RCTs) and seven observational studies (Cohort and case controls). A total of 714 patients were evaluated, comprising 295 females (41.3%) and 419 males (58.7%), with a mean age of 60.11 years (SD = 10.22).

CONCLUSION

The studies underscore the ongoing debate regarding the optimal surgical approach for IOL implantation in cases of insufficient capsular support. Both anterior chamber and retropupillary techniques demonstrates efficacy, with the latter offering potential advantages through retropupillary iris-claw IOL implantation via scleral approach. However, larger-scale studies with longer follow-up periods are still needed to definitively establish the relative merits of the different procedures.

摘要

背景

在白内障手术中,人工晶状体(IOL)的最佳放置位置通常是在囊袋内。然而,在缺乏足够囊膜支撑的情况下,会采用其他技术,如巩膜缝合人工晶状体、前房人工晶状体以及前房或瞳孔后虹膜固定人工晶状体。这些方法之间的选择取决于外科医生的专业技能、患者的特定解剖结构和临床情况等因素,前房虹膜爪形人工晶状体提供了一种更直接的方法,而瞳孔后技术可能需要先进技能才能带来额外益处。

目的

本系统评价旨在评估前房与瞳孔后虹膜爪形人工晶状体固定术的临床效果。

方法

按照系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目指南,使用PubMed、Cochrane Central、Scopus和Web of Science数据库进行全面的文献检索,直至2024年5月。这些检索集中在与方法相关的特定术语上,并使用标准化的在线表格提取数据。

结果

该评价纳入了9项研究,包括2项随机对照试验(RCT)和7项观察性研究(队列研究和病例对照研究)。共评估了714例患者,其中女性295例(41.3%),男性419例(58.7%),平均年龄60.11岁(标准差 = 10.22)。

结论

这些研究强调了在囊膜支撑不足的情况下,关于人工晶状体植入最佳手术方法的持续争论。前房和瞳孔后技术均显示出疗效,后者通过巩膜途径植入瞳孔后虹膜爪形人工晶状体可能具有潜在优势。然而,仍需要进行更大规模、更长随访期的研究,以明确确定不同手术方法的相对优点。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1443/11918784/419404d502b2/ms9-87-299-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验