Child Stella A, Mulligan Christina, Pavlov Ivan, Bryan Simone, Li Leah, Knowles Rachel Louise
Medical Research Council, Swindon, UK.
Population, Policy and Practice Research and Teaching Department, UCL Great Ormond St Institute of Child Health, London, UK.
R Soc Open Sci. 2025 Mar 19;12(3):241380. doi: 10.1098/rsos.241380. eCollection 2025 Mar.
Considering diversity when designing and conducting research is fundamental to the responsible conduct of research and ensures that outputs from scientific research are reproducible, minimize bias and enable everyone within society the opportunity to benefit. Therefore, health and biomedical research should include consideration of diversity and inclusion in the way studies are designed and conducted. An evaluation of health researchers' approaches to diversity was undertaken to generate evidence to inform research policy development by the UK Medical Research Council (MRC). Seven hundred and seventy-two researchers responded to an anonymized public survey about diversity and inclusion in research design and 590 applications for research funding were evaluated. Fifty per cent of survey respondents undertaking human participant research reported taking diversity, usually age and sex, into account. Although 43% of animal researchers reported using females and males, only 28% of grant applications demonstrated this. Our findings demonstrate that many researchers do not routinely consider diversity when designing research. Furthermore, we identified a gap between what animal researchers reported doing and what was evident in funding applications. Informed by this analysis, MRC implemented a new policy requiring researchers to demonstrate how they embed diversity and inclusion in research design. This survey provides a benchmark for evaluating policy impact.
在设计和开展研究时考虑多样性是负责任的研究行为的基础,可确保科研成果具有可重复性,最大限度减少偏差,并让社会中的每个人都有机会受益。因此,健康和生物医学研究应在研究的设计和开展方式中纳入对多样性和包容性的考量。对健康研究人员处理多样性问题的方法进行了评估,以生成证据,为英国医学研究理事会(MRC)制定研究政策提供参考。772名研究人员回应了一项关于研究设计中的多样性和包容性的匿名公众调查,并对590份研究经费申请进行了评估。开展涉及人类参与者研究的调查受访者中有50%报告称在研究中考虑了多样性,通常是年龄和性别。尽管43%的动物研究人员报告称使用了雌性和雄性动物,但只有28%的经费申请体现了这一点。我们的研究结果表明,许多研究人员在设计研究时并未常规性地考虑多样性。此外,我们发现动物研究人员报告的做法与经费申请中体现的情况之间存在差距。基于这一分析,医学研究理事会实施了一项新政策,要求研究人员说明他们如何在研究设计中融入多样性和包容性。这项调查为评估政策影响提供了一个基准。