Gupta Rukshana, Stiehl Emily, Wator Caroline, Pratap Preethi Lakshmi, Sherman Bruce W
School of Public Health, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
School of Public Health, Department of Health Policy and Administration, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Am J Health Promot. 2025 Jul;39(6):936-950. doi: 10.1177/08901171251326316. Epub 2025 Mar 20.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the evidence base regarding employer-sponsored health and wellbeing (HWB) programs in relation to addressing workforce health inequities.Data SourceMultiple databases were systematically searched to identify research studies published between 2013 and 2022 regarding employer-sponsored HWB programs.Study Inclusion and Exclusion CriteriaResearchers included studies based on the following criteria: (1) described an employer-sponsored initiative to improve employee HWB; (2) included employees as the population of interest; (3) provided detail regarding participant demographics, and (4) included outcomes measures.Data ExtractionFour researchers screened the identified studies with abstraction conducted by a primary and secondary reviewer. Of the 3420 articles identified, 98 studies were eligible and abstracted.Data SynthesisData synthesis focused on research approach and design, as well as work setting, HWB program characteristics, and approach to inclusion of historically underrepresented or low-wage subpopulations.ResultsThe majority of studies highlighted programs focused on improving employee physical health (54) and/or mental health (24) or the workplace environment (27). Fourteen studies incorporated a randomized experimental design. Though nine studies intentionally recruited historically underrepresented populations and ten studies involved low-wage workers, none included race or ethnicity as independent variables. Various facilitators and barriers to employee participation were explored.ConclusionsDespite increasing employer focus on workforce HWB, few studies explored the program implications on historically underrepresented or low-wage populations or subpopulations.
目的
评估关于雇主赞助的健康与福祉(HWB)计划在解决劳动力健康不平等问题方面的证据基础。
数据来源
系统检索了多个数据库,以识别2013年至2022年期间发表的关于雇主赞助的HWB计划的研究。
研究纳入和排除标准
(1)描述了雇主发起的旨在改善员工HWB的举措;(2)将员工作为感兴趣的人群;(3)提供了参与者人口统计学的详细信息,以及(4)包括结果指标。
数据提取
四位研究人员筛选了已识别的研究,由一位主要和一位次要评审员进行摘要提取。在识别出的3420篇文章中,98项研究符合条件并进行了摘要提取。
数据综合
数据综合侧重于研究方法和设计,以及工作环境、HWB计划特征,以及纳入历史上代表性不足或低薪亚人群体的方法。
结果
大多数研究强调了侧重于改善员工身体健康(54项)和/或心理健康(24项)或工作场所环境(27项)的计划。十四项研究采用了随机实验设计。尽管有九项研究有意招募历史上代表性不足的人群,十项研究涉及低薪工人,但没有一项将种族或族裔作为自变量。探讨了员工参与的各种促进因素和障碍。
结论
尽管雇主越来越关注劳动力的HWB,但很少有研究探讨这些计划对历史上代表性不足或低薪人群或亚人群体的影响。