Sheena-Peer Leeav, Rafaeli Eshkol, Berenson Kathy R, Downey Geraldine, Kivity Yogev
Department of Psychology, Bar Ilan University.
Department of Psychology, Gonda Multidisciplinary Brain Research Center, Bar-Ilan University.
Personal Disord. 2025 Mar 20. doi: 10.1037/per0000721.
Emptiness is central to borderline personality disorder (BPD), significantly impacts quality of life, and is associated with increased impulsivity. Nevertheless, studies of emptiness in daily life are scarce and little is known about factors that may mitigate the emptiness-impulsivity association in BPD, such as mentalizing (Mz), the capacity to understand mental states. The current study examined whether emptiness predicts impulsive behaviors in daily life and whether this association is moderated by disorder or by Mz. The study utilized data from an existing data set (Berenson et al., 2011) of 153 participants (57 with a BPD diagnosis, 43 with avoidant personality disorder [APD], and 53 serving as healthy controls [HC]). Following a baseline lab assessment of Mz (Baron-Cohen et al., 2001), participants completed 3 weeks of ecological momentary assessment (EMA) with five daily prompts, including self-reported measures of emptiness and impulsivity. EMA data were analyzed using multilevel modeling. Both the BPD and APD groups reported higher levels of momentary emptiness compared to the HC group. The BPD group exhibited higher levels of impulsivity in daily life compared to the HC and APD groups. There were no group differences in Mz. Interestingly, emptiness significantly predicted impulsivity and was positively associated with impulsivity in both the BPD and HC groups but not in the APD group. Finally, Mz did not moderate the emptiness-impulsivity association. Emptiness seems central to impulsivity in daily life. More ecological and emptiness-specific measures of Mz may have better potential to mitigate the negative consequences of emptiness. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
空虚是边缘性人格障碍(BPD)的核心特征,对生活质量有显著影响,并与冲动性增加有关。然而,关于日常生活中空虚的研究很少,对于可能减轻BPD中空虚与冲动性关联的因素,如心理化(Mz),即理解心理状态的能力,我们所知甚少。本研究考察了空虚是否能预测日常生活中的冲动行为,以及这种关联是否受到障碍类型或Mz的调节。该研究使用了来自现有数据集(贝伦森等人,2011年)的153名参与者的数据(57名被诊断为BPD,43名患有回避型人格障碍[APD],53名作为健康对照[HC])。在对Mz进行基线实验室评估(巴伦 - 科恩等人,2001年)之后,参与者完成了为期3周的生态瞬时评估(EMA),每天有五个提示,包括自我报告的空虚和冲动性测量。EMA数据使用多层次建模进行分析。与HC组相比,BPD组和APD组报告的瞬时空虚水平更高。与HC组和APD组相比,BPD组在日常生活中表现出更高的冲动性水平。Mz在各组之间没有差异。有趣的是,空虚显著预测了冲动性,并且在BPD组和HC组中与冲动性呈正相关,但在APD组中并非如此。最后,Mz并没有调节空虚与冲动性之间的关联。空虚似乎是日常生活中冲动性的核心。更具生态性和针对空虚的Mz测量可能更有潜力减轻空虚的负面影响。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2025美国心理学会,保留所有权利)