Olazagasti Coral, Celi Claudia Villa, Mahtani Arun, Velazquez Ana I, Kiel Lauren, Sridhar Arthi, Horiguchi Miki, Gonzalez Mariana, Bernabe Carolina, Abioye Oyepeju, Dizman Nazli, Florez Narjust
University of Miami Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, FL.
Capital Health, Trenton, NJ.
JCO Glob Oncol. 2025 Mar;11:e2400513. doi: 10.1200/GO-24-00513. Epub 2025 Mar 20.
Although international medical graduates (IMGs) and Puerto Rican Medical Graduates (PRMGs) comprise an integral part of the health care workforce, these individuals, particularly women, frequently face numerous types of discrimination throughout medical training and independent practice. To our knowledge, we conducted the first cross-sectional study to understand the journeys and consequences of migration faced by IMGs and PRMGs in the US oncology workforce.
We developed a cross-sectional, online survey consisting of 51 multiple choice and open-ended questions that captured demographic information, professional status, period of migration to the United States, location within the United States that participants migrated to, reasons for migration, cultural adaptation, experiences of discrimination during training, and overall professional experiences in the United States.
The majority of participants cited better education, professional gains, and a lack of opportunities in participants' home country as primary reasons for migration to the United States. However, most participants, particularly women, experienced staunch assimilation to fit the mold of professional American standards; women were also particularly likely to report experiences of racial/ethnic, language, and gender discrimination during oncology training in the United States, which only marginally improved during independent practice. Despite such discrimination, most participants reported excellent professional satisfaction during training and independent practice, although only moderate personal satisfaction. Most participants decided to stay in the United States, citing reasons pertaining to enhanced professional opportunities, whereas those that returned home valued reasons relating to family and quality of life.
Our sobering findings underscore the need for institutional enforcement of an inclusive environment encompassing cultural humility, enactment of programs addressing barriers to socialization, immigration laws, and financial support, creation of IMG-specific support networks, and the sponsorship and promoting of minority women physicians.
尽管国际医学毕业生(IMGs)和波多黎各医学毕业生(PRMGs)是医疗保健劳动力的重要组成部分,但这些人,尤其是女性,在整个医学培训和独立执业过程中经常面临多种形式的歧视。据我们所知,我们开展了第一项横断面研究,以了解在美国肿瘤学劳动力队伍中的IMGs和PRMGs所面临的移民历程及后果。
我们设计了一项横断面在线调查,包含51个选择题和开放式问题,涵盖人口统计学信息、职业状况、移民到美国的时间、移民到美国的地点、移民原因、文化适应、培训期间的歧视经历以及在美国的总体职业经历。
大多数参与者将更好的教育、职业收获以及母国缺乏机会作为移民到美国的主要原因。然而,大多数参与者,尤其是女性,经历了坚定的同化以符合美国专业标准模式;女性在接受美国肿瘤学培训期间也特别容易报告种族/民族、语言和性别歧视经历,而在独立执业期间这种情况仅有轻微改善。尽管存在这种歧视,但大多数参与者在培训和独立执业期间报告了极高的职业满意度,不过个人满意度仅为中等。大多数参与者决定留在美国,理由是职业机会增加,而回国的人则看重与家庭和生活质量相关的原因。
我们令人警醒的研究结果强调,需要通过机构强制营造一个包容的环境,包括文化谦逊、制定解决社交障碍、移民法和经济支持的项目、创建针对IMGs的支持网络,以及赞助和推广少数族裔女医生。