• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

有或无急性脑损伤患者撤用或停用维持生命治疗的决策:两项前瞻性队列研究的二次分析

Decisions to withdraw or withhold life-sustaining therapies in patients with and without acute brain injury: a secondary analysis of two prospective cohort studies.

作者信息

Taran Shaurya, Liu Kuan, McCredie Victoria A, Penuelas Oscar, Burns Karen E A, Frutos-Vivar Fernando, Scales Damon C, Ferguson Niall D, Singh Jeffrey M, Malhotra Armaan K, Adhikari Neill K J

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada; Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Lancet Respir Med. 2025 Apr;13(4):338-347. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(24)00404-1. Epub 2025 Mar 17.

DOI:10.1016/S2213-2600(24)00404-1
PMID:40112845
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Many deaths in the intensive care unit (ICU) occur after a decision to withdraw or withhold life-sustaining therapies (WLSTs). We aimed to explore the differences in the incidence and timing of WLST between patients with and without acute brain injuries (ABIs).

METHODS

We did a secondary analysis of two prospective, international studies that recruited patients who were invasively or non-invasively ventilated between 2004 and 2016 from 40 countries. ABI was defined as brain trauma, ischaemic stroke, intracranial haemorrhage, seizures, or meningitis-encephalitis. The comparator group included non-ABI conditions. Time to WLST was evaluated by use of cumulative incidence curves. Differences in WLST were analysed by use of multilevel logistic regression.

FINDINGS

Between March 11, 2004, and Dec 17, 2016, we recruited 21 970 patients (16 791 in the WLST analysis), of whom 13 526 (61·6%) were male and 8444 (38·4%) were female and 2896 (13·2%) had ABI. WLST occurred in 2056 (12·2%) of 16 791 patients) and was more common in patients with ABI versus without (372 [17·0%] of 2191 vs 1684 [11·5%] of 14 600; risk difference 5·5%; 95% CI 3·8-7·1; odds ratio [OR] 2·42; 1·89-3·12). WLST decisions occurred earlier in patients with ABI versus patients without ABI (median, 4 days [IQR 2-9] versus 6 days [2-13] after ICU admission; absolute difference, 2 days; 95% CI 1-3). Findings were similar across different ABI subgroups, world regions, and cohort years. Variability among ICUs in WLST decisions for patients with ABI and patients without ABI was high (respectively, median OR, 3·04; 95% CI 2·54-3·67, and median OR 2·59; 2·38-2·78).

INTERPRETATION

Our findings suggest that WLST decisions are significantly more common in patients with ABI versus patients without ABI and occur earlier in this group. The rationale for early WLST following ABI warrants further exploration, accounting for additional neurological factors that were not available in the present analysis.

FUNDING

Canadian Institutes of Health Research.

摘要

背景

重症监护病房(ICU)中的许多死亡发生在决定撤除或 withhold 维持生命治疗(WLST)之后。我们旨在探讨有和没有急性脑损伤(ABI)的患者在 WLST 的发生率和时机上的差异。

方法

我们对两项前瞻性国际研究进行了二次分析,这两项研究招募了 来自 40 个国家在 2004 年至 2016 年间接受有创或无创通气的患者。ABI 被定义为脑外伤、缺血性中风、颅内出血、癫痫发作或脑膜炎 - 脑炎。比较组包括非 ABI 情况。通过累积发病率曲线评估至 WLST 的时间。使用多水平逻辑回归分析 WLST 的差异。

结果

在 2004 年 3 月 11 日至 2016 年 12 月 17 日期间,我们招募了 21970 名患者(WLST 分析中有 16791 名),其中 13526 名(61.6%)为男性,8444 名(38.4%)为女性,2896 名(13.2%)有 ABI。16791 名患者中有 2056 名(12.2%)发生了 WLST,在有 ABI 的患者中比没有 ABI 的患者更常见(2191 名中有 372 名[17.0%] vs 14600 名中有 1684 名[11.5%];风险差异 5.5%;95%CI 3.8 - 7.1;比值比[OR]2.42;1.89 - 3.12)。与没有 ABI 的患者相比,有 ABI 的患者做出 WLST 决定更早(中位数,ICU 入院后 4 天[IQR 2 - 9] 对 6 天[2 - 13];绝对差异,2 天;95%CI 1 - 3)。在不同的 ABI 亚组、世界区域和队列年份中结果相似。ICU 对有 ABI 和没有 ABI 的患者做出 WLST 决定的变异性很高(分别为,中位数 OR,3.04;95%CI 2.54 - 3.67,以及中位数 OR 2.59;2.38 - 2.78)。

解读

我们的研究结果表明,与没有 ABI 的患者相比,有 ABI 的患者做出 WLST 决定明显更常见,且在该组中发生得更早。ABI 后早期 WLST 的基本原理值得进一步探索,同时考虑本分析中未有的其他神经学因素。

资金来源

加拿大卫生研究院。

相似文献

1
Decisions to withdraw or withhold life-sustaining therapies in patients with and without acute brain injury: a secondary analysis of two prospective cohort studies.有或无急性脑损伤患者撤用或停用维持生命治疗的决策:两项前瞻性队列研究的二次分析
Lancet Respir Med. 2025 Apr;13(4):338-347. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(24)00404-1. Epub 2025 Mar 17.
2
Decision-Making on Withholding or Withdrawing Life Support in the ICU: A Worldwide Perspective.重症监护病房中关于停止或撤销生命支持的决策:全球视角
Chest. 2017 Aug;152(2):321-329. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2017.04.176. Epub 2017 May 5.
3
Prevalence, reasons, and timing of decisions to withhold/withdraw life-sustaining therapy for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients with extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation.体外心肺复苏治疗院外心脏骤停患者时,决定 withholding/withdraw 生命支持治疗的流行率、原因和时机。
Crit Care. 2023 Jun 27;27(1):252. doi: 10.1186/s13054-023-04534-2.
4
Withholding and withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy in 8569 trauma patients: A multicentre, analytical registry study.8569例创伤患者生命维持治疗的 withhold 与撤除:一项多中心分析注册研究
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2022 May 1;39(5):418-426. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001671. Epub 2022 Feb 14.
5
Impact of a Devastating Brain Injury Pathway on Outcomes, Resources, and Organ Donation: 3 Years' Experience in a Regional Neurosciences ICU.严重脑损伤治疗路径对治疗结果、资源及器官捐献的影响:地区神经科学重症监护病房的3年经验
Neurocrit Care. 2020 Aug;33(1):165-172. doi: 10.1007/s12028-019-00879-1.
6
Influence of health insurance on withdrawal of life sustaining treatment for patients with isolated traumatic brain injury: a retrospective multi-center observational cohort study.医疗保险对单纯性创伤性脑损伤患者停止生命维持治疗的影响:一项回顾性多中心观察性队列研究。
Crit Care. 2024 Jul 18;28(1):251. doi: 10.1186/s13054-024-05027-6.
7
Variation in timing of decisions to withdraw life-sustaining treatment in adult ICU patients from three centres in different geographies: Do clinical factors explain the difference?来自不同地区三个中心的成年重症监护病房患者放弃维持生命治疗决策时机的差异:临床因素能解释这种差异吗?
South Afr J Crit Care. 2020 Jul 30;36(1). doi: 10.7196/SAJCC.2020.v36i1.393. eCollection 2020.
8
Withdrawal of Life-Sustaining Therapies in Children With Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.儿童严重创伤性脑损伤患者的生命支持治疗撤停。
J Neurotrauma. 2023 Jul;40(13-14):1388-1401. doi: 10.1089/neu.2022.0321. Epub 2023 Feb 27.
9
Insurance Type and Withdrawal of Life-Sustaining Therapy in Critically Injured Trauma Patients.保险类型与创伤危重症患者生命支持治疗的撤停
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jul 1;7(7):e2421711. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.21711.
10
Withdrawal of Life-supporting Treatment in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.严重创伤性脑损伤患者的生命支持治疗的撤离。
JAMA Surg. 2020 Aug 1;155(8):723-731. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.1790.

引用本文的文献

1
Estimating bias from withdrawal of life sustaining treatment in clinical trials.评估临床试验中撤除维持生命治疗导致的偏倚。
Crit Care. 2025 Jul 8;29(1):288. doi: 10.1186/s13054-025-05538-w.