Bagandanshwa Kenneth, Mchome Bariki, Kibona Upendo, Salum Ibrahim, Mangi Glory, Masenga Gileard, Kavishe Adelaida, Mushi Cecilia, Egenberg Signe, Eggebø Torbjørn Moe
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kilimanjaro Christian Medical University College, Moshi, Tanzania.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre, Moshi, Tanzania.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2025 Dec;38(1):2480186. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2025.2480186. Epub 2025 Mar 20.
Accurate determination of fetal head position is essential for managing labor, particularly in cases of slow progress or before operative vaginal interventions. Several studies have shown that ultrasound examinations are more accurate than clinical examinations, but few ultrasound studies are done in sub-Saharan Africa. Clinical vaginal assessment of fetal position remains the standard in most African settings, but its accuracy is limited by examiner skills and labor conditions. This study aimed to compare clinical and ultrasound assessments of fetal position during active labor, to identify factors contributing to clinical misdiagnosis, and to evaluate the impact of misdiagnosis on delivery mode.
An observational cohort study was conducted at Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre in Moshi, Tanzania, from 19 November 2023 to 13 April 2024. Fetal position was categorized as a clock; 10 to 2 o'clock as occiput anterior (OA) position, 3 o'clock as left occiput transverse (LOT) position, 4 to 8 o'clock as occiput posterior (OP) position, and 9 o'clock as right occiput transverse (ROT) position. Three trained doctors conducted ultrasound examinations, while midwives performed clinical assessments recording position, station, cervical dilatation, caput succedaneum, and molding. Fetal station ranged from -5 to +5. Caput succedaneum was first graded as 0, +1, +2, or +3 and recategorized as none (0), slight (grade +1), and huge (grade +2 and +3). Molding was categorized as absent or present. Clinical misdiagnosis of position was defined as any discrepancy between clinical and ultrasound assessments using ultrasound examinations as the gold standard. Misdiagnosis included cases where the fetal head position could not be determined clinically, as well as those that were incorrectly assessed through vaginal examination. Blinded comparisons evaluated agreement and clinical misdiagnosis. Factors contributing to clinical misdiagnosis were assessed using logistic regression and potential confounders included maternal age, gestational age, body mass index (BMI), station during the second stage, caput succedaneum, and molding.
The final study population comprised 215 women, 204 were examined in the active first labor stage and 210 in the second stage. Fetal position could not be determined clinically in 40/204 (19.6%) women in the active first stage, but ultrasound successfully determined position in all cases. The overall agreement rate in the active first stage was 101/164 (61.6%), with 60/76 (78.9%) agreement in OA position and 41/88 (46.6%) agreement in non-OA positions. Agreement in classifying position into four categories (OA, LOT, OP, and ROT) was moderate (Cohen's kappa, = 0.41, 95% CI 0.31-0.52). In the second stage, clinical assessment failed in 11/210 (5.2%) cases, while ultrasound failed in 5/210 (2.4%). The overall agreement rate was 155/194 (79.9%), with 133/152 (87.5%) agreement in OA position and 22/42 (52.4%) agreement in non-OA positions. Cohen's kappa in classifying position into four categories showed moderate agreement ( = 0.46, 95% CI 0.32-0.59). Presence of molding showed a strong association with clinical misdiagnosis, adjusted OR 5.81 (95% CI 1.95-17.30). Slight caput succedaneum was not associated; however, a huge caput succedaneum was significantly associated with clinical misdiagnosis, adjusted OR 5.95 (95% CI 1.85-19.13). Fetal station showed a significant inverse association in unadjusted analysis, where a lower fetal station reduced the likelihood of clinical misdiagnosis, unadjusted OR 0.63 (95% CI 0.41-0.96), but this association was not significant in the adjusted analysis, OR 0.64 (95% CI 0.39-1.06). Maternal age, gestational age, and BMI were not associated with clinical misdiagnosis in either model. The cesarean section (CS) rate among parturients with misdiagnosed positions was 19/50 (38.0%), compared to 14/155 (9.0%) in women with correctly assessed positions ( < .001).
Clinical and ultrasound assessments showed moderate agreement. Caput succedaneum and molding influenced clinical misdiagnosis, and misdiagnosed positions were associated with higher CS rates.
准确确定胎儿头部位置对于产程管理至关重要,尤其是在产程进展缓慢或进行阴道手术干预之前。多项研究表明,超声检查比临床检查更准确,但撒哈拉以南非洲地区很少进行超声研究。在大多数非洲地区,临床阴道评估胎儿位置仍是标准方法,但其准确性受检查者技能和产程条件限制。本研究旨在比较活跃产程中临床和超声对胎儿位置的评估,确定导致临床误诊的因素,并评估误诊对分娩方式的影响。
2023年11月19日至2024年4月13日,在坦桑尼亚莫希的乞力马扎罗基督教医疗中心进行了一项观察性队列研究。胎儿位置按钟表划分;10点至2点为枕前位(OA),3点为左枕横位(LOT),4点至8点为枕后位(OP),9点为右枕横位(ROT)。三名经过培训的医生进行超声检查,同时助产士进行临床评估,记录位置、胎先露、宫颈扩张、头皮水肿和颅骨重叠情况。胎先露范围为-5至+5。头皮水肿首先分为0、+1、+2或+3级,然后重新分类为无(0)、轻度(+1级)和重度(+2级和+3级)。颅骨重叠分为存在或不存在。以超声检查为金标准,临床对位置的误诊定义为临床评估与超声评估之间的任何差异。误诊包括临床无法确定胎儿头部位置的情况,以及通过阴道检查错误评估的情况。采用盲法比较评估一致性和临床误诊情况。使用逻辑回归评估导致临床误诊的因素,潜在混杂因素包括产妇年龄、孕周、体重指数(BMI)、第二产程时的胎先露、头皮水肿和颅骨重叠情况。
最终研究人群包括215名女性,其中204名在第一产程活跃期接受检查,210名在第二产程接受检查。在第一产程活跃期,40/204(19.6%)的女性临床无法确定胎儿位置,但超声在所有病例中均成功确定了位置。第一产程活跃期的总体一致性率为101/164(61.6%),枕前位的一致性为60/76(78.9%),非枕前位的一致性为41/88(46.6%)。将位置分为四类(枕前位、左枕横位、枕后位和右枕横位)的一致性为中等(Cohen's kappa = 0.41,95%CI 0.31 - 0.52)。在第二产程,11/210(5.2%)的病例临床评估失败,而超声检查失败的有5/210(2.4%)。总体一致性率为155/194(79.9%),枕前位的一致性为133/152(87.5%),非枕前位的一致性为22/42(52.4%)。将位置分为四类的Cohen's kappa显示中等一致性(= 0.46,95%CI 0.32 - 0.59)。颅骨重叠与临床误诊有很强的关联,调整后的OR为5.81(95%CI 1.95 - 17.30)。轻度头皮水肿无关联;然而,重度头皮水肿与临床误诊显著相关,调整后的OR为5.95(95%CI 1.85 - 19.13)。在未调整分析中,胎先露显示出显著的负相关,较低的胎先露降低了临床误诊的可能性,未调整的OR为0.63(95%CI 0.41 - 0.96),但在调整分析中该关联不显著,OR为0.64(95%CI 0.39 - 1.06)。在两个模型中,产妇年龄、孕周和BMI与临床误诊均无关联。位置误诊的产妇剖宫产(CS)率为19/50(38.0%),而位置评估正确的女性为14/155(9.0%)(P <.001)。
临床和超声评估显示中等一致性;头皮水肿和颅骨重叠影响临床误诊,误诊与较高的剖宫产率相关。