Malekian Abdollah, Mudgal Shiv Kumar, Kalal Nipin, Zaghi Shima, Hosseini Marznaki Zohreh, Hoseini Seyyed Hamid, Keshavarzi Fatemeh, Hosseininejad Seyed Mohammad
Faculty of Medicine, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.
College of Nursing, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Deoghar, Jharkhand, India.
Int J Emerg Med. 2025 Mar 20;18(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s12245-025-00852-0.
This study aimed to examine patients' attitude and information-seeking behaviour related to intra-venous (IV) fluid use for the common cold visited in emergency department.
A cross-sectional analytical study was conducted from January to May 2024. A total of 365 patients aged 18 years and older presenting with cold symptoms were surveyed using a validated questionnaire. The survey assessed demographic information, attitudes towards IV fluid therapy, and the sources of information patients used. Descriptive statistics, and one-sample t-tests were performed to compare mean perceptions against a neutral score (e.g., 3 on a 5-point Likert scale) using SPSS version 21.
The mean age of participants was 39.35 ± 15.48 years, with 48.5% women and 51.5% men. Nearly two-third (62.19%) of participants were agree or strongly agree that patient with cold must receive IV Fluid to get well. While the majority of participants disagreed that IV fluid therapy strengthens the body (mean = 2.08 ± 1.02) or boosts immunity (mean = 2.03 ± 0.98), many perceived it as effective in infection elimination (mean = 3.81 ± 1.24) and disease prevention (mean = 3.18 ± 1.09). The majority of participants-81.92%, 88.49%, and 89.04%-agreed that sneezing, runny nose, and mild fever, respectively, required IV fluids. Key information sources were specialists (mean = 4.17 ± 1.17) and medical journals (mean = 3.83 ± 1.18), while general practitioners (mean = 2.43 ± 1.21) and social networks (mean = 2.6 ± 1.33) were less utilized.
The findings highlight the need for public health education on the natural course of the common cold and the appropriate use of ED services to reduce unnecessary IV fluid administration.
本研究旨在调查急诊科就诊的普通感冒患者对静脉输液的态度及信息寻求行为。
于2024年1月至5月进行一项横断面分析研究。使用经过验证的问卷对365名18岁及以上出现感冒症状的患者进行了调查。该调查评估了人口统计学信息、对静脉输液治疗的态度以及患者使用的信息来源。使用SPSS 21版进行描述性统计和单样本t检验,以将平均认知与中性评分(例如,5分制李克特量表上的3分)进行比较。
参与者的平均年龄为39.35±15.48岁,其中女性占48.5%,男性占51.5%。近三分之二(62.19%)的参与者同意或强烈同意感冒患者必须接受静脉输液才能康复。虽然大多数参与者不同意静脉输液治疗能增强体质(平均=2.08±1.02)或提高免疫力(平均=2.03±0.98),但许多人认为它在消除感染(平均=3.81±1.24)和预防疾病(平均=3.18±1.09)方面有效。大多数参与者——分别为81.92%、88.49%和89.04%——同意打喷嚏、流鼻涕和轻度发烧分别需要静脉输液。主要信息来源是专科医生(平均=4.17±1.17)和医学期刊(平均=3.83±1.18),而全科医生(平均=2.43±1.21)和社交网络(平均=2.6±1.33)的利用率较低。
研究结果凸显了开展关于普通感冒自然病程以及合理使用急诊科服务的公共健康教育的必要性,以减少不必要的静脉输液。