Suppr超能文献

扳机指经皮手术与开放手术的比较结果:一项倾向评分分析。

Comparative results of percutaneous and open surgery for trigger fingers: a propensity score analysis.

作者信息

Chanthanapodi Praphan, Aodsup Sasithorn

机构信息

Orthopaedic Department, Somdejphrajaotaksin Maharaj Hospital, Tak, Thailand.

出版信息

Front Surg. 2025 Mar 6;12:1509292. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1509292. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Trigger finger is a common hand condition characterized by the locking of a digit, often requiring surgical intervention when conservative treatments fail. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of a modified percutaneous release technique with those of traditional open release surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 245 patients (287 digits), of which 161 digits underwent open release and 126 underwent percutaneous release. A modified technique for percutaneous release was described. Propensity score matching was used to balance the data. Cox regression and Laplace regression were applied to analyze the hazard ratio and median survival time for pain relief and time to return to work. Adverse events were also reported.

RESULTS

The duration of pain relief in the percutaneous release group was shorter than that in the open release group (hazard ratio = 1.73, 95% CI: 0.98-3.06;  = 0.057). Fifty percent of patients in the percutaneous release group experienced pain relief within two days, compared to seven days in the open release group ( = 0.003). Time to return to work was significantly shorter in the percutaneous release group than in the open release group (hazard ratio = 2.93, 95% CI: 2.08-4.13;  < 0.001). Fifty percent of patients in the percutaneous release group returned to work within three days, compared to 15 days in the open release group ( < 0.001). Three digits (2.4%) required conversion to open release due to the failure of percutaneous release. No nerve injuries or recurrences were observed at a follow-up of 42.2 ± 2.2 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Percutaneous release resulted in an earlier return to work and a high success rate (97.6%) with no nerve injuries or recurrences over 42 months. Despite a 2.4% failure rate, careful technique minimized complications. Further randomized trials are needed to confirm these findings and optimize patient selection.

摘要

背景与目的

扳机指是一种常见的手部疾病,其特征为手指卡顿,保守治疗失败时通常需要手术干预。本研究旨在比较改良经皮松解技术与传统开放性松解手术的效果。

材料与方法

对245例患者(287个手指)进行回顾性队列研究,其中161个手指接受了开放性松解,126个手指接受了经皮松解。描述了一种改良的经皮松解技术。采用倾向评分匹配法平衡数据。应用Cox回归和拉普拉斯回归分析疼痛缓解的风险比和中位生存时间以及恢复工作的时间。还报告了不良事件。

结果

经皮松解组的疼痛缓解持续时间短于开放性松解组(风险比=1.73,95%置信区间:0.98-3.06;P=0.057)。经皮松解组50%的患者在两天内疼痛缓解,而开放性松解组为七天(P=0.003)。经皮松解组恢复工作的时间显著短于开放性松解组(风险比=2.93,9%置信区间:2.08-4.13;P<0.001)。经皮松解组50%的患者在三天内恢复工作,而开放性松解组为15天(P<0.001)。由于经皮松解失败,有三个手指(2.4%)需要转为开放性松解。在42.2±2.2个月的随访中,未观察到神经损伤或复发。

结论

经皮松解导致恢复工作更早,成功率高(97.6%),在42个月内无神经损伤或复发。尽管失败率为2.4%,但仔细的技术操作将并发症降至最低。需要进一步的随机试验来证实这些发现并优化患者选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e559/11922895/4b867bf59440/fsurg-12-1509292-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验