• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[口服激素避孕药使用情况工具的构建与验证。口服避孕药使用情况工具的构建与验证]

[Construcción y Validación de un Instrumento Sobre el Uso de Anticonceptivos Hormonales OralesConstruction and Validation of Instrument on the use of Oral Contraceptive].

作者信息

Viana-Dos-Santos Francisco de Assis, de Sousa-Ventura Alice, Bastos-de-Castro Amanda, Monteiro-Furtado Angelina, de Menezes-Nogueira Jéssica, Corrêa-da-Penha Jardeliny

机构信息

. Universidade Federal do Piauí, Floriano, Piauí, Brasil. E-mail:

出版信息

Rev Cuid. 2021 Sep 10;12(3):e1970. doi: 10.15649/cuidarte.1970. eCollection 2021 Sep-Dec.

DOI:10.15649/cuidarte.1970
PMID:40115224
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11297412/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Oral hormonal contraceptives are among the contraceptive methods most used by wom- en, when used correctly, it is highly effective, but for proper use, it is essential that they have adequate knowledge and attitudes about them.

OBJECTIVE

To build and validate an inquiry to assess knowledge, attitudes and practice on or use of oral hormonal contraceptive.

METHODS

Methodological study, which took place in two stages: construction of the survey and validation by expert judges. The content validity analysis was performed using the Content Validity Index (CVI). The judges evaluated each item individ- ually, with respect to language clarity, practical relevance and theoretical relevance. The Research Ethics Committee approved the research.

RESULTS

In the integrative literature review, 34 publications were selected and their analysis allowed the identification of the three categories: knowledge, attitudes and practice regarding the use of oral hormonal contraceptives, which led to the construction of the survey with 34 questions. As for the CVI, most of the questions had a value greater than 0.8 (80.0%), which was used as a parameter. Regarding the total CVI per judge, 10 (83.3%) of them also had a value higher than 0.8. The total CVI of the survey was 0.86.

CONCLUSIONS

The constructed survey proved to be a valid instrument for obtaining a situational diagnosis of the levels of knowledge, attitudes and practice of a given population that uses oral contraceptives.

摘要

引言

口服激素避孕药是女性最常用的避孕方法之一,正确使用时非常有效,但要正确使用,她们必须对其有足够的了解和正确的态度。

目的

构建并验证一项用于评估口服激素避孕药的知识、态度和使用情况的调查问卷。

方法

进行了一项分两个阶段的方法学研究:调查问卷的构建和由专家评委进行验证。使用内容效度指数(CVI)进行内容效度分析。评委们分别从语言清晰度、实际相关性和理论相关性方面对每个项目进行评估。研究获得了伦理委员会的批准。

结果

在综合文献综述中,筛选出34篇出版物,通过对它们的分析确定了三个类别:口服激素避孕药使用方面的知识、态度和实践,这促成了一份包含34个问题的调查问卷的构建。至于CVI,大多数问题的值大于0.8(80.0%),这被用作一个参数。关于每位评委的CVI总值,其中10位(83.3%)的值也高于0.8。该调查问卷的总CVI为0.86。

结论

所构建的调查问卷被证明是一种有效的工具,可用于对使用口服避孕药的特定人群的知识、态度和实践水平进行情境诊断。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7575/11297412/f9ae22f14c06/2346-3414-cuid-12-03-e1970-gch4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7575/11297412/5400e6f80791/2346-3414-cuid-12-03-e1970-gch1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7575/11297412/c9792a92fd10/2346-3414-cuid-12-03-e1970-gch2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7575/11297412/f9ae22f14c06/2346-3414-cuid-12-03-e1970-gch4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7575/11297412/5400e6f80791/2346-3414-cuid-12-03-e1970-gch1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7575/11297412/c9792a92fd10/2346-3414-cuid-12-03-e1970-gch2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7575/11297412/f9ae22f14c06/2346-3414-cuid-12-03-e1970-gch4.jpg

相似文献

1
[Construcción y Validación de un Instrumento Sobre el Uso de Anticonceptivos Hormonales OralesConstruction and Validation of Instrument on the use of Oral Contraceptive].[口服激素避孕药使用情况工具的构建与验证。口服避孕药使用情况工具的构建与验证]
Rev Cuid. 2021 Sep 10;12(3):e1970. doi: 10.15649/cuidarte.1970. eCollection 2021 Sep-Dec.
2
The construction and validation of an instrument for the assessment of graduates of undergraduate nursing courses.本科护理课程毕业生评估工具的构建与验证
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2016 Jun 14;24. doi: 10.1590/1518-8345.0834.2710.
3
Oral health in childhood: construction and validation of an instrument on knowledge, attitude, and practice of caregivers.儿童口腔健康: caregiver 知识、态度和实践的工具的构建和验证。
Cien Saude Colet. 2023 Aug;28(8):2203-2214. doi: 10.1590/1413-81232023288.07042023.
4
[Knowledge, attitudes and practices regarding diagnosis and management of delirium at the Cayetano Heredia Hospital].[关于卡耶塔诺·埃雷迪亚医院谵妄诊断与管理的知识、态度和实践]
Vertex. 2025 Jan 10;35(166, oct.-dic.):29-37. doi: 10.53680/vertex.v35i166.722.
5
Measurement and evaluation of national family planning programs.国家计划生育方案的测量和评估。
Demography. 1967 Mar;4(1):71-80. doi: 10.2307/2060351.
6
Bowel Function After J-Pouch May Be More Complex Than Previously Appreciated: A Comprehensive Analysis to Highlight Existing Knowledge Gaps.J 袋手术后的肠道功能可能比之前预期的更为复杂:全面分析以突出现有知识差距。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2020 Feb;63(2):207-216. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001543.
7
The Nursing Diagnosis of risk for pressure ulcer: content validation.压疮风险的护理诊断:内容效度
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2016 Jun 14;24. doi: 10.1590/1518-8345.0782.2693.
8
Validation of an educative manual for patients with head and neck cancer submitted to radiation therapy.对头颈部癌症放疗患者教育手册的验证
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2016 Jun 14;24. doi: 10.1590/1518-8345.0949.2706.
9
Accidental Bowel Leakage Evaluation: A New Patient-Centered Validated Measure of Accidental Bowel Leakage Symptoms in Women.意外性肠漏评估:一种新的以患者为中心的女性意外性肠漏症状的验证性测量方法。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2020 May;63(5):668-677. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001596.
10
Identifying Current Barriers in Patient Educational Content Surrounding Rectal Prolapse and Rectocele: Using Animation to Bridge the Gaps.识别围绕直肠前突和直肠膨出的患者教育内容中的当前障碍:使用动画来弥合差距。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2024 Aug 1;67(8):1077-1084. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000003345. Epub 2024 May 7.

本文引用的文献

1
Contraceptive Knowledge Assessment: validity and reliability of a novel contraceptive research tool.避孕知识评估:一种新型避孕研究工具的有效性和可靠性
Contraception. 2017 Feb;95(2):190-197. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2016.09.002. Epub 2016 Sep 9.
2
50 years of hormonal contraception-time to find out, what it does to our brain.50 年的激素避孕-是时候了解一下,它对我们的大脑有什么影响了。
Front Neurosci. 2014 Aug 21;8:256. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2014.00256. eCollection 2014.
3
[Content validity in the development and adaptation processes of measurement instruments].
[测量工具开发与改编过程中的内容效度]
Cien Saude Colet. 2011 Jul;16(7):3061-8. doi: 10.1590/s1413-81232011000800006.
4
[Knowledge, attitude and practice about the use of pill and preservative among adolescents university students].[大学生对避孕药和防腐剂使用的知识、态度及行为]
Rev Bras Enferm. 2008 Jan-Feb;61(1):11-7. doi: 10.1590/s0034-71672008000100002.
5
[Perioperative prevention of skin injury: an integrative literature review].围手术期皮肤损伤的预防:一项整合文献综述
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2006 Jan-Feb;14(1):124-31. doi: 10.1590/s0104-11692006000100017. Epub 2006 Mar 8.
6
[The development of handbooks of health care guidelines].[医疗保健指南手册的发展]
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2005 Sep-Oct;13(5):754-7. doi: 10.1590/s0104-11692005000500022. Epub 2005 Nov 22.
7
The integrative review: updated methodology.整合性综述:更新后的方法
J Adv Nurs. 2005 Dec;52(5):546-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03621.x.
8
Two quantitative approaches for estimating content validity.两种用于估计内容效度的定量方法。
West J Nurs Res. 2003 Aug;25(5):508-18. doi: 10.1177/0193945903252998.
9
Validating an instrument for clinical supervision using an expert panel.使用专家小组验证临床监督工具。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2003 Aug;40(6):619-25. doi: 10.1016/s0020-7489(03)00036-1.
10
Selection and use of content experts for instrument development.为工具开发选择和使用内容专家。
Res Nurs Health. 1997 Jun;20(3):269-74. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1098-240x(199706)20:3<269::aid-nur9>3.0.co;2-g.